Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
characteristics of self disclosure
review of attribution theory
importance of computer mediated communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: characteristics of self disclosure
The article that I am doing my research analysis on is titled The Disclosure– Intimacy Link in Computer-Mediated Communication: An Attributional Extension of the Hyperpersonal Model. It focuses on the differences that attributions of self-disclosure on computer mediated communication (CMC) and face to face (FtF) interaction. In regards to communication, the article utilizes the social penetration theory, a theory which states that intimacy and self-disclosure are the main factors in developing interpersonal relationships(Altman & Taylor, 1973). With the social penetration theory in mind, research sought out to compare the result of self-disclosure on relationship intimacy in CMC as opposed to FtF interaction. The hyperpersonal model which explains that people communicating via CMC edit the way they present themselves, sculpting an ideal image in regards to the way they present attributions in development of interpersonal relationships. The hyperpersonal model is influential in this article and is the basis for the author’s theory on attribution. The authors hypothesize that: (H1) Relative to low self-disclosure, high self-disclosure leads to more intimacy in CMC than FtF interactions, (H2) Interpersonal attributions mediate the proposed intensification effect of medium on the disclosure–intimacy link, and (H3) the effect of self-disclosure on interpersonal attributions is greater in CMC than FtF interactions (Jiang, Bazarova, & Hancock, 2011).
To study these hypotheses the authors developed an experiment based on a 2 x 2 design which placed the communication medium (FtF vs. text-based CMC) and self-disclosure level (high vs. low) as between subject variables. In the experiment the authors accepted the level high/low self-disclo...
... middle of paper ...
...f-disclose information equally. Anyone with half a brain knows that females and males think very differently despite their physical similarities. That aspect was the one major weakness I noticed but other than that I would say this was a fantastic article.
Works Cited
Jiang, L., Bazarova, N. N., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). The disclosure-intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37(1), 58-77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research, 21, 460–487.
The Social Penetration model demonstrated two way in which communication can be more or less disclosing. The model is like an onion with layers. The first dimension is known as breadth, which is the range of the subjects being discussed, which with an onion as demonstration would be the outer layers. Second is depth, the depth level is significant and more central to ourselves, In the onion this would be the inner and core. The inner and core layers are the things with most private and significant to us. Thus, sharing information from our depth may require greater risk taking. The information from this dimension of self is typically known by and held in confidence by only a few people. Due to the fact
In “I’m So Totally, Digitally, Close to You: The Brave New World of Digital Intimacy,” an article first appeared in Wired and New York Times Magazine in 2008, Clive Thompson, a Canadian journalist, writer, and blogger, writes about the connection between society and the impact of social media. He points out the main topics, first explaining about the users’ attraction of Facebook and other forms of “incessant online contact” (585), then the benefits and disadvantages of social networking sites, and the rise of online awareness. Undoubtedly, social media has definitely expanded our social circle allowing for more relationships and making our close ones stronger. In addition, it has also rapidly changed our traditional understanding of relationships
Getting to know you: Face-to-face versus online interactions was a longitudinal study conducted by Okdie, et. al in the year 2011. Results of the study rendered that computer-mediated communication reduces unity among or between the communicators. A huge number of interactions in this form involved animosity due to the convenience of identity-clouding if one opted to. Moreover, the people involved in online interaction are more self-conscious on how they present themselves and are more cautious with their choice of words. A probable reason beneath these ideas is that people tend to present themselves in a positive note on social networking sites as they have the power to control over the information to share, data to post, and messa...
The context of communication in these studies is interpersonal communication with a specific focus on intimacy in romantic relationships and in computer mediated communication, respectively.
....N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 191-204.
The Social Penetration Theory (SPT) by Irwin Altman and Dalmas Taylor (1973) provides a framework for describing the development of interpersonal relationships between individuals. During the development, SPT explains the way of two individuals communicate and how the relationship evolve from superficial to intimate and vice versa. Onion analogy is commonly used in explaining SPT in depth that people personalities are much like onions, made up of many layers. The theory of social penetration works when people gradually peel off one layer of their personality at a time until the core of the personality is reached. During the interpersonal development along two related dimensions which are breadth (number of topics used to discuss) and depth
The social penetration theory is a theory composed by Altman and Taylor in which people are compared to onions. This may seem like an absurd comparison, but when explored more deeply it makes quite a bit of sense. The social penetration theory is a description of the multi-layered nature of people's personalities. As the outer skin of an onion is peeled away another layer is found beneath it, and if you remove that layer you will expose another layer, and so forth. The same holds true for people; as we get to know someone better we expose more layers of their personality and hence become closer to the core of the individual, or the private self The outer layers of our personality is the public self, or characteristics that are apparent to people we do not know very well. Some of these characteristics include a person's world view, studies, and tastes (Griffin, 1997, p. 145). Altman and Taylor proceed to say that in order for people to develop close and meaningful relationships penetration must occur; this process requires self-disclosure and vulnerability in order to be achieved. People are able to choose who they want to become closer to and to decide how much of their private self they want to expose.
Mediated communication, a form of communication carried out by the use of technology, is becoming increasingly popular in today’s society. Used carefully and in the right way, it can provide improvements in our daily lives, whether it be for work or downtime. According to Alder, Rolls, and Proctor II, some benefits include creating a “glocalized” world, meaning connecting people from all over the world, encouraging offline interactions, and minimizing the perception of differences (Alder, Rolls, & Proctor II, 2015, pp. 13-15). However, there are also cons to using this form of communication such as there being no body language to decipher how the person feels or what they are communicating, disinhibition, and lack of true privacy (Alder, Rolls, & Proctor II, 2015, pp. 15-16). What you put on the internet will stay there forever and the documentary Facebook Follies shows us just that.
Shih, D., Hsu, S., Yen, D. C., & Lin, C. (2012). Exploring the Individual's Behavior on Self-Disclosure Online. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(10), 627-645.
As we get older our, views, and perspectives on relationships may change. An explanation for this is that we encounter different situations in different relationships. Some relationships may affect us more than others, and can even change the way we think and view things. However, we would have to evaluate our levels of communication with different people. The social penetration theory helps us to categorize the levels of interpersonal communication we have with others. Based on these levels, we are able to categorize the importance and meaning of the relationship. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the effects of social penetration theory and how it applies to our lives.
The social penetration theory states that the closer two people become, the deeper their connection
Irwin Altman and Dalmas Taylor conceptualized Social Penetration Theory (SPT) to better understand relational closeness (West & Turner, 2010). There are four primary assumptions of SPT. The first assumption is “Relationships progress from non-intimate to
Over the last century, information technology, such as the Internet, has brought our society forward and helps us get through life more efficiently and conveniently. In addition, it helps making global communication easier and faster as compared to hand-written mails that may take days if not weeks to reach its intended recipient. However, with such luxury and convenience, there is a debate whether the way we currently interact with fellow human beings with the help of technology is good or bad to our personal relationships. The Internet has increased the amount of communication globally, yet ironically the very technology that helps us increase our communication hinders our ability to socialize effectively in real life and create a healthy interpersonal relationship.
In class, we discussed and later investigated different theories about human relationships. All these theories examined why and how people relate to each other, as well as tried to explain why they choose a particular relationship and not others. I came across with the theory of Social Penetration while reading after one of our classes. Two American sociologists Altman and Taylor developed the theory. They insist, "…relations include various levels of intimacy, exchange or degree of social penetration." That is, there are stages in people’s relationships, which go through a sort of a process of systematic and predictable trajectory. This idea sounds interesting to anybody who is struggling with developing meaningful relationships. Just thinking that relationships follow a trail to proximity, which is organized and predictable development for sure will save me from countless disappointments.
“In order to maintain a positive on-going relationship in any difficult face-to-face circumstance, an individual must learn the appropriate socialization rituals. Knowing these rituals and being able to play a proper front stage role is crucial in order for an individual to get along with others (Brignall and Valey, 2005).” With the relatively recent rise of social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook, the means for maintaining relationships through these platforms rather than speech communication and face-to-face communication are becoming much more apparent and widespread throughout society. However, it is difficult to maintain these relationships without knowing proper social skills especially if these skills are not practiced or introduced to an individual. Although, “Communication frequency and self-disclosure play a role in computer-mediated communication and the formation of online friendships just as they do in face-to-face interactions and offline friendships (Subrahmanyam and Greenfield, 2008).” Yet, in our vast digital world that we reside in today, the ways in which we choose to communicate are becoming hindered by our participation in online communication. “We must have a philosophical understanding of the purpose and importance of communication to individuals and based upon this understanding, shape our attitude and value toward the communication process (McFarlane, 2010).” It is extremely crucial to understand communication’s importance and to not tuck the original beliefs and values regarding the tool underneath the rug, resorting and succumbing to communicating poorly in a fashion that mimics what we have now experienced via our devices. “As with any social change, we also believe there is a need to study and understand the impacts that change might have, regardless of whether such changes are viewed as positive or