Kelsen sees norms as the main starting point within law. The argument is that a legal norm derives from itself and thus finds normality in itself. There has to be a basis in la...
... middle of paper ...
Griffith, J. (1986) What is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24, pp. 1-55.
Hart, H.L.A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon.
Kelsen, H. (1967) Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Luhmann, N. (1985) A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge.
Miller, R., and Sarat, A. (1981) Grievances, Claims and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture, Law and Society Review, 15(3-4), pp. 52-62.
Nobles, R., Schiff, D. (2006) A Sociology of Jurisprudence. Oxford: Hart
Raz, J. (1986) The Purity of the Pure Theory. In Tur, R., and Twining, W. Essays on Kelsen. Oxford: Clarendon.
Teubner, G. (1983). Law & Society Review, 17(2). United States: Wiley.
Teubner, G. (1997) Global Bukowina. Legal Pluralism in the World Society. In: Teubner, G., ed. Global Law Without a State. Aldershot: Ashgate/Dartmouth Publishers.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The importance of legal positivism for legal practitioners is undoubted. The legal system, originating from two version being both English and Continental-European, has indeed undergone a process of evolution. Today, the existence of a separate legal view in society with its legal norms and a strict separation of law and morality is witnessed. An autonomous order has emerged in our modern society and law is now seen to be separate and self-sustaining with a normative function. There was no longer an external view of the legal system, as all law is man-made by the Parliament and thus a new theory was needed to understand and replace natural law.... [tags: legal positivism, judges, rule bound]
2130 words (6.1 pages)
- Introduction This submission will discuss the problems created by the Doctrine of Judicial Precedent and will attempt to find solutions to them. Whereas, English Law has formed over some 900 years it was not until the middle of the 19th Century that the modern Doctrine was ‘reaffirmed’. London Tramways Co. Ltd V London County Council (1898). Law is open to interpretation, all decisions made since the birth of the English Legal System, have had some form of impact whether it is beneficial or not The term ‘Judicial Precedent’ has at least two meanings, one of which is the process where Judges will follow the decisions of previously decided cases, the other is wh... [tags: Judicial Precedent]
1530 words (4.4 pages)
- Influences on Judicial Power Under Article III of the Constitution the judicial branch was established, but rather implicit in proportion to the other two branches of government. This ambiguity allocates various opportunities for interpretation of judicial power. In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton addresses the role of the judiciary branch within the federal government in regards to political immunity of judges through life tenure and contribution to checks and balances through power or judicial review.... [tags: Political Science Judicial Review Essays]
1468 words (4.2 pages)
- ... Symptomatically the legislation goes into detail surrounding the definition of a “vicious lawless associate,” which includes a person who: “commits a declared offence,” and, “at the time the offence is committed, or during the course of the commission of the offence, is a participant in the affairs of an association,” and, “did or omitted to do the act that constitutes the declared offence for the purposes of, or in the course of participating in the affairs of, the relevant association,”. Although there is a counter measure within the legislation that states, “a person is not a vicious lawless associate if the person proves that the relevant association is not an association that has, a... [tags: Law, Separation of powers]
1556 words (4.4 pages)
- How are the powers of the judicial branch unique among the three branches of government. The Judicial Branch was written to have very little power, it originally had a federal court and then had to be divided into lower. The President is in charge of appointing the justices, and all of the decision from congress and the executive branch have to go through the judicial branch in order for them to decide if it constitutional or unconstitutional. How does the principle of federalism work in the judicial branch.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
1213 words (3.5 pages)
- Justices must by necessity implicitly or explicitly consider questions of wisdom, justice, social harm and morality when deciding if a statute is unconstitutional. They should ensure that all these considerations are rooted in constitutional principles and constitutional questions. Society should not imagine these considerations are not present in judicial reasoning, nor should justices be ruled by them. The questions justices properly ask when deciding if a statute is unconstitutional are shaped by a moral vision of the proper role of the judiciary in representative democracy.... [tags: Ethics]
2255 words (6.4 pages)
- Judicial review was enacted as a checks and balance step when concerning the government and the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Judicial review gives the court the power to review and change laws and government acts that violate the Constitution (Huq, n.d.). Allowing the court system this power helps prevent government officials from using the Constitution to illegally use their position in making laws and regulations in the United States. The judicial review was first used in an unusual way and under unusual circumstances.... [tags: Justice System ]
977 words (2.8 pages)
- The Difference between Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint Our American judiciary branch of the federal government has contributed and molded our American beliefs in this great nation. This branch of government is respected because of the code of conduct that the judges, no matter how conservative or liberal. The language of the court as well as the uniform of the cloaks that judges wear has most probably contributed towards this widespread respect. Throughout the history of the United States, I noticed a pattern of "cause and effect" that our judiciary branch had practiced.... [tags: Papers]
641 words (1.8 pages)
- Judicial Precedent Setting a precedent is providing an example for others to follow. Legal precedent is however slightly more complicated. It is the term given to a previous decision, a particular stance or view, judge's Statement, or the effect of certain fact(s) present within a past case; which dictates or influences the adjudication or verdict of a later case. Or put simply 'a reason for deciding a particular issue as established by a judge in a previous case'. Judicial Precedent is separated into the three Latin named sectors which define a judgement:- Stare Decisis, (the literal interpretation 'let the decision stand').... [tags: Papers]
1418 words (4.1 pages)
- Judicial Activism: A Necessary Action Judicial activism is rarely needed, but when it is employed, it is only in the most dire of circumstances. It is the broad interpretation of the constitution of the United States by the Supreme Court. Some argue that this should not be done, but if it had not been, slavery would still exist in America. It is obvious that in some cases, it is necessary to expand civil rights beyond what the constitution explicitly states. This was the case in Brown v.... [tags: essays research papers]
1048 words (3 pages)