Kelsen sees norms as the main starting point within law. The argument is that a legal norm derives from itself and thus finds normality in itself. There has to be a basis in la...
... middle of paper ...
Griffith, J. (1986) What is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24, pp. 1-55.
Hart, H.L.A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon.
Kelsen, H. (1967) Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Luhmann, N. (1985) A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge.
Miller, R., and Sarat, A. (1981) Grievances, Claims and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture, Law and Society Review, 15(3-4), pp. 52-62.
Nobles, R., Schiff, D. (2006) A Sociology of Jurisprudence. Oxford: Hart
Raz, J. (1986) The Purity of the Pure Theory. In Tur, R., and Twining, W. Essays on Kelsen. Oxford: Clarendon.
Teubner, G. (1983). Law & Society Review, 17(2). United States: Wiley.
Teubner, G. (1997) Global Bukowina. Legal Pluralism in the World Society. In: Teubner, G., ed. Global Law Without a State. Aldershot: Ashgate/Dartmouth Publishers.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The importance of legal positivism for legal practitioners is undoubted. The legal system, originating from two version being both English and Continental-European, has indeed undergone a process of evolution. Today, the existence of a separate legal view in society with its legal norms and a strict separation of law and morality is witnessed. An autonomous order has emerged in our modern society and law is now seen to be separate and self-sustaining with a normative function. There was no longer an external view of the legal system, as all law is man-made by the Parliament and thus a new theory was needed to understand and replace natural law.... [tags: legal positivism, judges, rule bound]
2130 words (6.1 pages)
- Introduction This submission will discuss the problems created by the Doctrine of Judicial Precedent and will attempt to find solutions to them. Whereas, English Law has formed over some 900 years it was not until the middle of the 19th Century that the modern Doctrine was ‘reaffirmed’. London Tramways Co. Ltd V London County Council (1898). Law is open to interpretation, all decisions made since the birth of the English Legal System, have had some form of impact whether it is beneficial or not The term ‘Judicial Precedent’ has at least two meanings, one of which is the process where Judges will follow the decisions of previously decided cases, the other is wh... [tags: Judicial Precedent]
1530 words (4.4 pages)
- Influences on Judicial Power Under Article III of the Constitution the judicial branch was established, but rather implicit in proportion to the other two branches of government. This ambiguity allocates various opportunities for interpretation of judicial power. In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton addresses the role of the judiciary branch within the federal government in regards to political immunity of judges through life tenure and contribution to checks and balances through power or judicial review.... [tags: Political Science Judicial Review Essays]
1468 words (4.2 pages)
- To first understand Justice Scalia and how he views Judicial Interpretation we must begin to look at how he understands and read the constitution. Justice Scalia has defined himself a textualist, this not to be confused with a constructionist. A textualist is someone who looks at the direct and original meaning of the word, not however what the Framers of the constitution wanted (Scalia, 38). To put it in simple terms the preface states that laws mean what they say not what legislators intend for them to say.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
1229 words (3.5 pages)
- There are issues within the charging of Alan as it is a complex scenario taking into account both cases, legislation as well as natural law; that affects his charge and the subsequent likelihood of conviction. What must be addressed with Alan as a priority, is his charge as a, “vicious lawless associate” which with a judicial activist lense could be considered unethical and in breach of basic human rights. In conjunction with this he has been charged with producing a dangerous drug, although he stated that he only harvested the drug, the definition needs to be investigated further and the validity of the charge must be bought into question under the proper legislation.... [tags: Law, Separation of powers]
1556 words (4.4 pages)
- Introduction What degree of creativity do judges really have and what is the role of a judge in our system. Underpinning the topic is the argument of judicial activism. This is very important because it about obtaining public confidence in our legal system so that we have the rule of law. The topic is significant as it examines the rule of law. The purpose of the system is seeking a fair and justice outcome, rather than being administrative processes. Well it is a nice idea of the knit black and white world but I think in reality actually it is not like that.... [tags: Law, Judge, Separation of powers, Decision making]
939 words (2.7 pages)
- Judicial review was enacted as a checks and balance step when concerning the government and the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Judicial review gives the court the power to review and change laws and government acts that violate the Constitution (Huq, n.d.). Allowing the court system this power helps prevent government officials from using the Constitution to illegally use their position in making laws and regulations in the United States. The judicial review was first used in an unusual way and under unusual circumstances.... [tags: Justice System ]
977 words (2.8 pages)
- The Difference between Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint Our American judiciary branch of the federal government has contributed and molded our American beliefs in this great nation. This branch of government is respected because of the code of conduct that the judges, no matter how conservative or liberal. The language of the court as well as the uniform of the cloaks that judges wear has most probably contributed towards this widespread respect. Throughout the history of the United States, I noticed a pattern of "cause and effect" that our judiciary branch had practiced.... [tags: Papers]
641 words (1.8 pages)
- Judicial Precedent Setting a precedent is providing an example for others to follow. Legal precedent is however slightly more complicated. It is the term given to a previous decision, a particular stance or view, judge's Statement, or the effect of certain fact(s) present within a past case; which dictates or influences the adjudication or verdict of a later case. Or put simply 'a reason for deciding a particular issue as established by a judge in a previous case'. Judicial Precedent is separated into the three Latin named sectors which define a judgement:- Stare Decisis, (the literal interpretation 'let the decision stand').... [tags: Papers]
1418 words (4.1 pages)
- Judicial Activism: A Necessary Action Judicial activism is rarely needed, but when it is employed, it is only in the most dire of circumstances. It is the broad interpretation of the constitution of the United States by the Supreme Court. Some argue that this should not be done, but if it had not been, slavery would still exist in America. It is obvious that in some cases, it is necessary to expand civil rights beyond what the constitution explicitly states. This was the case in Brown v.... [tags: essays research papers]
1048 words (3 pages)