Kelsen sees norms as the main starting point within law. The argument is that a legal norm derives from itself and thus finds normality in itself. There has to be a basis in la...
... middle of paper ...
Griffith, J. (1986) What is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24, pp. 1-55.
Hart, H.L.A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon.
Kelsen, H. (1967) Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Luhmann, N. (1985) A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge.
Miller, R., and Sarat, A. (1981) Grievances, Claims and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture, Law and Society Review, 15(3-4), pp. 52-62.
Nobles, R., Schiff, D. (2006) A Sociology of Jurisprudence. Oxford: Hart
Raz, J. (1986) The Purity of the Pure Theory. In Tur, R., and Twining, W. Essays on Kelsen. Oxford: Clarendon.
Teubner, G. (1983). Law & Society Review, 17(2). United States: Wiley.
Teubner, G. (1997) Global Bukowina. Legal Pluralism in the World Society. In: Teubner, G., ed. Global Law Without a State. Aldershot: Ashgate/Dartmouth Publishers.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The importance of legal positivism for legal practitioners is undoubted. The legal system, originating from two version being both English and Continental-European, has indeed undergone a process of evolution. Today, the existence of a separate legal view in society with its legal norms and a strict separation of law and morality is witnessed. An autonomous order has emerged in our modern society and law is now seen to be separate and self-sustaining with a normative function. There was no longer an external view of the legal system, as all law is man-made by the Parliament and thus a new theory was needed to understand and replace natural law.... [tags: legal positivism, judges, rule bound]
2130 words (6.1 pages)
- Introduction This submission will discuss the problems created by the Doctrine of Judicial Precedent and will attempt to find solutions to them. Whereas, English Law has formed over some 900 years it was not until the middle of the 19th Century that the modern Doctrine was ‘reaffirmed’. London Tramways Co. Ltd V London County Council (1898). Law is open to interpretation, all decisions made since the birth of the English Legal System, have had some form of impact whether it is beneficial or not The term ‘Judicial Precedent’ has at least two meanings, one of which is the process where Judges will follow the decisions of previously decided cases, the other is wh... [tags: Judicial Precedent]
1530 words (4.4 pages)
- Influences on Judicial Power Under Article III of the Constitution the judicial branch was established, but rather implicit in proportion to the other two branches of government. This ambiguity allocates various opportunities for interpretation of judicial power. In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton addresses the role of the judiciary branch within the federal government in regards to political immunity of judges through life tenure and contribution to checks and balances through power or judicial review.... [tags: Political Science Judicial Review Essays]
1468 words (4.2 pages)
- Justices must by necessity implicitly or explicitly consider questions of wisdom, justice, social harm and morality when deciding if a statute is unconstitutional. They should ensure that all these considerations are rooted in constitutional principles and constitutional questions. Society should not imagine these considerations are not present in judicial reasoning, nor should justices be ruled by them. The questions justices properly ask when deciding if a statute is unconstitutional are shaped by a moral vision of the proper role of the judiciary in representative democracy.... [tags: Ethics]
2255 words (6.4 pages)
- Judicial review was enacted as a checks and balance step when concerning the government and the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Judicial review gives the court the power to review and change laws and government acts that violate the Constitution (Huq, n.d.). Allowing the court system this power helps prevent government officials from using the Constitution to illegally use their position in making laws and regulations in the United States. The judicial review was first used in an unusual way and under unusual circumstances.... [tags: Justice System ]
977 words (2.8 pages)
- Since its first appearance in 1947 in Fortune Magazine, the term Judicial Activism has promoted incandescent debates about the rule of courts in public policy, however to date there is not a consensus of what judicial activism really means. The term may denote a pejorative description of judicial behavior or in other instances the sophisticated elaboration of judicial concepts. (Roosevelt III 2006:1) Since 1947 the term have been used extensively in magazines, newspapers and law reviews, by 1990 was used in average 450 times a year, appeared in 3815 law review articles and several other publications (Kmiec, 2004).... [tags: American Government, Courts, Public Policies]
753 words (2.2 pages)
- Courts frequently turn to a number of different methods and techniques in an effort to adequately rule on cases and controversies. One approach in particular in known as judicial minimalism. Through this approach, judges attempt to provide specific interpretation that simply address the case and issue at hand. Judges who implement judicial minimalism often rule in a “narrow and shallow” manner as noted by Professor Cass Sunstein. This consequentially lessens the likely hood of mistakes and additionally minimizes the ramifications of any errors made.... [tags: court, case, law, controversy]
2200 words (6.3 pages)
- The Difference between Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint Our American judiciary branch of the federal government has contributed and molded our American beliefs in this great nation. This branch of government is respected because of the code of conduct that the judges, no matter how conservative or liberal. The language of the court as well as the uniform of the cloaks that judges wear has most probably contributed towards this widespread respect. Throughout the history of the United States, I noticed a pattern of "cause and effect" that our judiciary branch had practiced.... [tags: Papers]
641 words (1.8 pages)
- Judicial Precedent Setting a precedent is providing an example for others to follow. Legal precedent is however slightly more complicated. It is the term given to a previous decision, a particular stance or view, judge's Statement, or the effect of certain fact(s) present within a past case; which dictates or influences the adjudication or verdict of a later case. Or put simply 'a reason for deciding a particular issue as established by a judge in a previous case'. Judicial Precedent is separated into the three Latin named sectors which define a judgement:- Stare Decisis, (the literal interpretation 'let the decision stand').... [tags: Papers]
1418 words (4.1 pages)
- Judicial Activism: A Necessary Action Judicial activism is rarely needed, but when it is employed, it is only in the most dire of circumstances. It is the broad interpretation of the constitution of the United States by the Supreme Court. Some argue that this should not be done, but if it had not been, slavery would still exist in America. It is obvious that in some cases, it is necessary to expand civil rights beyond what the constitution explicitly states. This was the case in Brown v.... [tags: essays research papers]
1048 words (3 pages)