Introduction
The definition of Internet Governance remains broad and dependent on the context of the situation. It is important to understand that the term is not restricted to the activities of governments, however for purposes of this paper I will primarily be exploring the arguments and issues surrounding legal regulation of the Internet including factors shaping the debate such as the political environment, open information sharing, and the significance of international collaboration on this topic. It is also key to understand how the mechanics of the Internet infrastructure allow for low barriers to entry which in turn makes security and control at the state level difficult. By governance, I’m refering to the processes and institutions, both formal and informal, that guide and restrain the collective activities of a group (Keohane, 2002). Much of Internet Governance (IG) currently is controlled by one global institution The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). The organization operates as a mostly independent nonprofit which derives power from the US Department of Congress. It is easiest to think of them as the phonebook of the internet, or a switchboard connecting point A to point B. Most of the internets 2.8 billion users reside outside of the US and although the American government has never blocked any changes proposed by ICANN, they continue to hold the keys to what could easily considered a digital hegemony (Doing the ICANN, 2014). With such a massive network of stakeholders such as states, special interest groups, NGOs and powerful private industry players intermingled into the debate on IG, the status quo is sure to change. This topic represents one more example of a growing number of issue...
... middle of paper ...
...hallenges-us-hegemony-global-news-532137
Henry H. Perritt, Jr. (1998). The Internet as a Threat to Sovereignty? Thoughts on the
Internet's Role in Strengthening National and Global Governance. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Spring 1998), pp. 423-442. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25691114
Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. (2002) Power and interdependence in the information age, in
E.C. Kamarck and J.S. Nye (eds.) Governance.com- Democracy in the Information Age. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2001c) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: Norton.
Toyama, K. (2013, October 2). How Internet Censorship Actually Works in China. The
Atlantic. Retrieved May 5, 2014, from http://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/10/how-internet-censorship-actually-works-in-china/280188/
Schiller, W. J., Geer, J. G., & Segal, J. A. (2013). Gateways to democracy: introduction to American government, the essentials. (2nd ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth ;.
The author is this article is Kalev Leetaru, he is known as an American internet entrepreneur and academic. He is also a contributor to Foreign Policy, where he discusses current political events worldwide. He was appointed adjunct assistant professor at Georgetown university which is ranked #6 internationally and is an extremely well respected university in Washington DC.
Janda, Kenneth. Berry, Jeffrey. Goldman, Jerry (2008). The Challenge of Democracy (9th ed.). Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Janda, K., Berry, J., Golman, J., & Hula, K. (2009). The Challenge of Democracy: American
As domestic economies globalize, the line has blurred from where an item is built, where it is sold and where it is serviced. It provides opportunities for individuals in many communities to expand their knowledge and learn about other cultures. Outsourcing has flourished in China and it has enabled its citizens to hone their skills by broadening their education to learn new trades and has created new wealth in a rather lifeless economy. The internet and email has been the main force, for it provides people from all over the world the ability to communicate and learn about each other. The Internet is expanding people’s minds; it facilitates media reform, and to a certain degree may provide legal reform.
The Internet, originally arising from the American military, has grown to a main source of communication for millions around the world and has helped in creating a global village. The Internet started gaining fast acceptance in the 1990's especially in North America. Countries such as China however, still have limited access and control over the contents on the internet allowed ...
Landy, Marc and Sidney M. Milkis. American Government: Balancing Democracy and Rights. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 35-
Internet is a powerful tool that allows users to collaborate and interact with others all over the world conveniently and relatively safely. It has allowed education and trade to be accessed easily and quickly, but all these benefits do not come without very taxing costs. This is especially true when dealing with the likes of the Internet. Countries in the European Union and Asia have realized this and have taken action against the threat of net neutrality to protect their citizens, even at the cost of online privacy. Internet censorship is required to protect us from our opinions and vices. Every country should adopt Internet censorship and regulation since it improves society by reducing pornography, racism/prejudice, and online identity theft.
With an entity as vast as the Internet, it is not surprising that a variety of unanswered questions will arise. I’m positive that the Internet will continue to confound scholars as it continues to quickly evolve. By analyzing the views of the celebrants and skeptics, I have been able to understand the potential that the internet has. By using the PEC, I have been able to understand how democracy and capitalism relate to the issues of the Internet. In the future, I hope that society can develop a further understanding of the Internet and move toward the Internet that the celebrants had hoped for.
Landy, Marc and Sidney M. Milkis. American Government: Balancing Democracy and Rights. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
The internet has been one of the most influential technological advancements of the twenty-first century. It is in millions of homes, schools, and workplaces. The internet offers not only a way of communicating with people around the world, but also a link to information, shopping, chatting, searching, and maps. This freedom to be anyone and to "go" anywhere right from the comfort of home has become a cherished item. However, there is always a down side to every up. Because of the freedom to post anything and access anything on the internet, the issue of regulation has arisen; for example, what should and should not be allowed on the internet? Who has the right to regulate this space that we cherish for its freedom?
...s: Not now .. not likely?. Information Polity: The International Journal Of Government & Democracy In The Information Age, 18(3), 201-216. doi:10.3233/IP-130312
Internet regulation is basically restricting or controlling access to certain aspects or information. Internet regulation consists of mainly two categories: Censorship of data, and controlling aspects of the Internet.
Economist Intelligence Unit. "Democracy Index 2010." Information Policy. Economist Intelligence Unit, 2010. Web. 12 Nov. 2011. .