Our world today is filled with awful crimes that interfere with societies happiness and well being each and everyday. Different countries struggle with severe crimes that put their fellow citizens and cities in danger each and everyday. Some people question how to deal with such terrible inhuman acts toward people and societies each and everyday. In order to keep the world in tacked and a safe place against such crimes the International Criminal Court was first talked about in the 1970s, but became ratified to begin pursuing cases in July of 2002. The International Criminal Court is designed to prosecute, and bring to justice those responsible for the worst crimes, including genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, committed anywhere in the world (Hebel, n.d.) The ICC an independent international organization with 122 members, separate from the United Nations system (“Q&A: International criminal court,” 2011). It is the court of last resort, based out of Hague, Netherlands, and is only used when national authorities cannot or will not prosecute. The uniqueness of its purpose, structure, jurisdiction, and significance make its understanding essential to those studying public justice.
On July 17, 1998, a conference of 160 States established the first treaty-based permanent international criminal court (Hebel, n.d.). The treaty adopted is known as the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. It sets out the crimes falling within the jurisdiction of the ICC, the rules of procedure and the mechanisms for states to cooperate with the ICC (Hebel, n.d.). The main court of the ICC is in the Netherlands, but proceedings from the ICC may occur elsewhere in the world. The ICC is funded by 122 countries, and so...
... middle of paper ...
...d., p.
59). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, cengage learning.
Frequently asked questions. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/about
the court/frequently asked questions/pages/faq.aspx
Hebel, H. (n.d.). Understanding the international criminal court. Retrieved from http://www.icc-
cpi.int/iccdocs/PIDS/publications/UICCEng.pdf
Q&a: International criminal court. (March, 2011 11). Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/
news/world-11809908
Schabas, W. Killing the death penalty. TerraViva. Retrieved from http://www.ips.org/icc/
tv010702.htm
Structure of the court. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.icc-cpi.int/EN_MENUS/ICC/
STRUCTURE OF THE COURT/Pages/structure of the court.aspx
Vlavonou, G. (2013, October 17). Does politics win over justice?. Retrieved from http://
www.pambazuka.org/en/category/features/89287/print
...an, Payam. "Are International Criminal Tribunals a Disincentive to Peace?: Reconciling Judicial Romanticism with Political Realism." Human Rights Quarterly 31 (2009): 624-54.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an established court of law meant prosecute individuals accused of significant crimes, where national courts are unable or unwilling to (ICC, 2011). The ICC asserts itself as a court of last resort meant to supplement and strengthen national judiciaries. Being an international orga...
International law can go through substantial changes if the privileged legal subjects, states, share a common will. Whenever the circumstances are such, the actors can convene a conference and after a series of negotiations, they might conclude an international agreement among themselves resulting in a new setup of international law. From a procedural point of view, therefore, it is rather simple to ‘make’ international law. If the substantive elements significantly overlap (i.e. common denominator of state interests), international law can be altered in line with the will of the parties. This essay deals with four such fields which have significantly been modified during the post-1940 period: human rights, environmental law, law of the sea, and space law. The first two are of particular importance as they have overarching effects in relation to other legal fields.
On May 25, 1993, U.N. Security Council Resolution 827 established an international tribunal charged with prosecuting violations of international law arising from the armed conflicts in the former Yugoslavia. Not since the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, following World War II has an international court tried individuals accused of crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide. The International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTFY), which was established at The Hague, Netherlands, is widely seen as an important step toward the deterrence of crimes, the establishment of the firm rule of international law, and the promotion of world peace. Yet, from its inception, the tribunal has generated controversy among supporters and detractors. Among those who believe that the tribunal idea is sound, the principal concerns are that such an institution be established on a sound legal basis, that it adhere to an acceptably high standard of due process, that it administer equal and dispassionate justice, and that it be perceived by nations and individuals to be legitimate, fair and effective. Unfortunately, the Yugoslavia tribunal has not yet met all these standards--and may never be able to meet all of them in the fullest sense. A discussion of some of the realities that face the ICTFY demonstrates why the task of making the tribunal work is so difficult--and why it is vital that it be accomplished.
Criminal justice includes the procedures that are involved in addressing matters of crime. These criminal activities are overseen by maintaining social control and mitigation any criminal activities that may take place. Criminal justice includes making sanctions to those who are found on the wrong and punishing them where necessary. Criminal justice is faced with a scrutiny by both local and international bodies (Peri et al, 2010). There are different opinions on a country’s criminal justice system and these opinions depend on different benchmarks set by the observers. Some of the observers may sometimes be victims of criminal activities that could have had lasting effects on their psychological and physical set up. The question of the
“On November 21, 1947, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted resolution 174 (II), establishing the International Law Commission and approving its statute.”[2] The International Law Commission encourages the development of international law and its codification. The Commission deals primarily with public international law, but also hears private cases as well.[3] International law is applied within an international community, such as the United Nations, and functions to define the proper norms or standards for members to abide by in a collective manner. Examples of such standards could be a ruling on The Universal Declaration of Human Rights or on threats to peace within the International Community.
'The United Nations Declaration on Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power' (UN Basic Principles), premised on recommendations of the Sixth UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and Treatment of Offenders, was passed on November 29, 1985 by the UN General Assembly (UNGA), is worth mentioning here. Recalling that millions of victims of crime and of abuse of power are neither well-protected in CJS nor are their reparatory rights adequately recognised and protected under CJDS and realising that a million of such victims, and their families, are being made to sustain 'injury' or to incur 'loss', the UNGA, through the Basic Principles, not only urged its members to treat 'victims' with 'compassion and respect' but also urged to resort to appropriate measures at the internationnal, regional and national levels to improve their access to justice and fair treatment, restitution, compensation and assistance. Based on the conviction of the international community that victims should be treated with compassion and respect for their dignity and that they are
...th 2001). Roth argues that the concept of international jurisdiction is not a new idea but was exercised by the US government in the 1970 after an aircraft hijacking. Also the war crime courts established after the end of World War II exercised international jurisdiction. In fact the Geneva Convention states that is a person regardless of their nationality should be brought before the court of any state in which that person has committed grave breaches of law and convention. Roth states that the concept of international jurisdiction is not a new one but that only in recent years have states been willing to act on universal jurisdiction and go after criminals of the international community regardless of their stating or power within the international community. Roth believes in the ability and authority of international organizations and institutions (Roth 2001).
According to Sycamnias (1999) international policing is the term used to signify legal interaction and participation on a global scale by a variety of law enforcement bodies, in order to better develop and preserve individual jurisdictional justice systems. International policing operations in effect bestow a new meaning to the phrase the long arm of the law. Under normal conditions, countries only have the power to control activities that occur within their sovereign territorial borders (Sycamnias 1999). International policing enables joint intervention by countries within which crimes have originated or transpired.
Every country has a form of criminal justice system. This system consists in a different series of organizations that work together to defend, sentence and punish those that did not follow the law or have been involved in any type of crime. In most of the countries, the system is similar be-cause is based on law enforcement agencies, attorney generals, judges, courts of law and prisons. All of these organizations work together to contribute towards the better enhancement of the working cooperation within the criminal justice system. However, these procedures won’t al-ways be fully applicable in certain countries.
Von Galhn and Taulbee. 2013. Law Among Nations. An Introduction to Public International Law. Pearson Education.
International law is a body of legally binding rules that are suppose to govern the relations between sovereign states. (Cornell Law School) In order to be a qualified subject, a state has to be sovereign. To be considered sovereign the state needs to have territory, a population, and a government that is recognized or legitimized to most other states. In the more modern explanation of international law now can include the rights and obligation on intergovernmental international organizations and even individuals. Examples of an international organization would be Greenpeace or the United Nations and an example of an individual would be war criminals, a leader of a state that violated human rights during a time of war. When a dispute arise and cannot be solved amongst the two actors involved they can turn to the U.N. to arbitrate and to the International Court of Justice, one of many courts within the U.N. to find a resolution to their problem. The International Court of Justice’s main task is to help settle legal disputes submitted to it by states and...
Many controversies have arisen nowadays as to whether international law is “natural law”, international law now faces considerable criticism as to its effectiveness as law and doubts as to its actual existence, and its power to bind countries .
Public International law International law contains of rules and principles, which preside over the relations and communication of nations with each other. International Law that is in most other countries referred to as Public International Law concerns itself only with questions of rights among more than a few nations or nations and the citizens or subjects of other nations. In dissimilarity, Private International Law deals with controversies among confidential persons, natural or juridical, arising out of situations having important association to further than one nation. In current years the line up connecting public and private international law have became more and more doubtful. Issues of private international law may also associate issues of public international law and numerous matters of private international law nave considerable meaning for the international group of people of nations. International Law consists of the basic, classic concepts of law in nationwide legal systems, status, property, responsibility, and tort. It also includes substantive law, procedure, process and remedies. International Law is rooted in receipt by the nation states, which comprise the system. Customary law and conventional law are primary sources of international law. Customary international law results when states trail convinced practices usually and time after time out of an intelligence of legal responsibility. Lately the customary law was codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Conventional international law derives from international agreements and may obtain any appearance that the constricting parties have the same opinion upon. Agreements may be complete in admiration to any substance except for to the leve...
International Criminal Court Allegations of war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity have undoubtedly received unprecedented press coverage in recent years – more than at any time since Nuremberg. This is not because the incidences of such barbarities have increased, but simply because those crimes are brought to us more rapidly these days by the electronic media. Since the early 1990’s the international community has witnessed of a variety of criminal tribunals that were meant to promote peace-making and political transition in situations of gross violations of human rights and armed conflict among ethnical or religious groups. This tendency led to the establishment by the UN of two ad hoc Tribunals-for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda-and of the International Criminal Court (ICC). There was also a proliferation of 'mixed' judicial bodies-in Cambodia, Sierra Leone, Kosovo and East Timor-composed of both national and international judges and enforcing domestic as well as international criminal law.