City Courier Case Study

816 Words2 Pages

The City Couriers case study will be examined in regards to the company’s overall performance. The internal and external environments of City Couriers will be analysed in regards to the key performance requirements and key success factors. Issues with performance measurement, feedback, development and remuneration will be identified. Furthermore, the issues relating to validity, reliability, fairness and cost-effectiveness in the management of both performance and remuneration will be explored. This assessment aims to highlight the current situation and areas of improvement at City Couriers. A strategic analysis provides an examination of both the internal and external factors impacting on the organisation (Papulova & Gazova, 2016). City …show more content…

These include the company 's traditional management style, limited flexibility and adaptability within management and their poor performance assessments process. City Couriers should also assess their external environment regarding their economic position, political or legal changes, social implications, technological transformations as well as any variation in regards to competitors, customers and suppliers (Aguinis, 2014; Stone, 2013). The most significant external factor currently affecting the firm is the threat of legal action due to the current appraisal form which is only used for non-managerial staff. Therefore, the company would need to consider how they can thoroughly address the complaints to reduce the occurrence of legal action regarding their appraisal …show more content…

The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,

Open Document