Inspector Goole and the Theme of Socialism in An Inspector Calls

2333 Words5 Pages

JB Priestley’s intent in ‘An Inspector Calls’ was to convey the attitudes of socialism to the minds of the society in the Edwardian Era as he was a passionate believer of the concept. Priestley has attempted this through the employment of ‘Inspector Goole’ in the play. In the play drama is displayed through a variety of methods for the interest of the audience and the communication of personal views from JB Priestley. At the start the playwright creates slight allusions that produce tension; Sheila wondered ‘half seriously what had happened to Gerald previous summer when Gerald never went near Sheila’. Lady Croft and Sir George have not come to the engagement feast and Eric is behaving quite anxiously. Eric’s strange behaviour on the cheerful occasion creates trepidation and foreshadows a rather surprising event which interests the audience. A ‘sharp ring is heard of the front door bell’ interrupting Mr. Birling’s dialogue that explicates “that a man has to make his own way- has to look after himself” as though the ‘sharpness’ of the ring is opposing Birling’s ‘solemnity’ in his words. The stage direction instantly demonstrates juxtaposition between the Birling and the other anonymous individual; this also generates tension because of the fact that the individual is yet to be introduced. Eric felt very ‘uneasy’ after Edna said to Birling that an Inspector has arrived which gives the audience clues of Eric being involved in a crime, Eric’s uneasiness also makes Birling ‘sharply’ stare at Eric- this creates suspense for the audience. The lighting is used as colour symbolism through Priestley’s decision to imitate the emotions in the act, ‘the lighting should be pink and intimate until the Inspector arrives, and then it should... ... middle of paper ... ...ute the ‘responsibility’ for the death as he tells them that “each of them have helped to kill her” though his final words supposed that “there are millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us”, they were clearly implicated to the audience as he is talking about collective ‘responsibility’ and wanted the audience to acknowledge their own faults revealed in the characters (Shelia, Eric Gerald etc.); this is an use of a dramatic monologue to convey the message. He is talking about the society being ‘responsible’ for the women’s death as everyone is part of ‘one body’, as everyone is part of a unity and if this is not put into practice it will result in "fire and blood and anguish”, “Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek”. I think...

Open Document