Hume starts out by asserting that “All reasons concerning matters of fact seem to be founded on the relation of cause and effect” (p. 337). Thus, he states that none of this knowledge can come from a priori knowledge, or pure reason alone. So, Hume believes that “causes and effects are discoverable, not by reason but by experience” (p. 338). The example he uses is that of a billiard ball moving across a table. I know from my past experiences that the billiard ball moving in a straight line will cause another ball to move in the opposite direction when they strike each other. I can imagine a million other possible ways that the ball would have moved, but underneath it all I understand the concept of motion, which I would have no other way of understanding it unless I have experienced it before. If I was ignorant of ...
... middle of paper ...
... ideas of causality. What does affect Hume's ideas of cause and effect is the problem of induction, in which there seems to be no way of getting around it. Hume possibly stumbled upon a real limitation of human knowledge; the fact that an inductive proof requires further induction to justify it makes the whole way in which we acquire knowledge circular and very sketchy. Hume does not offer a solution to this problem, but one can come up with a pragmatic solution. If we did not believe any inference made via induction, our knowledge of the world would be very (omit) lacking, and it would be almost impossible to know anything at all. Thus it would be rational to trust in inductive inferences and the fact that the future will resemble the past, because if we do not then we are subject to widespread skepticism, which would severely (sp) affect our pursuit of knowledge.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume demonstrates how there is no way to rationally make any claims about future occurrences. According to Hume knowledge of matters of fact come from previous experience. From building on this rationale, Hume goes on to prove how, as humans we can only make inferences on what will happen in the future, based on our experiences of the past. But he points out that we are incorrect to believe that we are justified in using our experience of the past as a means of evidence of what will happen in the future.... [tags: Philosophy Hume Philosophical Essays]
1020 words (2.9 pages)
- Metaphysics as Addressed by Kant and Hume In the Prolegomena, Kant states that reading David Hume, "awakened him from his dogmatic slumber." It was Hume's An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding that made Kant aware of issues and prejudices in his life that he had previously been unaware of. This further prompted Kant to respond to Hume with his own analysis on the theory of metaphysics. Kant did not feel that Hume dealt with these matters adequately and resolved to pick up where Hume had left off, specifically addressing the question of whether metaphysics as a science is possible.... [tags: Papers Kant Hume Philosophy Essays]
1383 words (4 pages)
- David Hume, in An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, discusses how we cannot predict the future. Even though our experiences and our reasoning tell us that objects act in a predictable way, we still cannot prove how objects will act in the future based upon previous interactions. After biting into a piece of pizza we expect an enjoyable taste. This enjoyable taste is expected because our past experiences have proven this to us. Even though we think we can predict that the pizza will act the same as our previous experiences, it may just blow up upon biting.... [tags: Empiricists, Empiricism]
749 words (2.1 pages)
- Comparing Plato’s Symposium and David Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Philosophy, when broken down into the original Greek, is philos, which means love, and logos, which means word. Thus philosophy is the love of words or linguistics. There is not one way of viewing this love of words. Both Plato and David Hume examine philosophy in their texts, Symposium and An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, respectively. I will outline, then compare, these two philosophers’ views of philosophy to show that philosophy is a balance.... [tags: Comparison Compare Contrast Essays]
956 words (2.7 pages)
- The problem of miracles is an ancient one that has persisted for most of human history, but that has been addressed with some depth only in the last few centuries. The great empiricist philosopher David Hume was one of the first to present an analysis of miracles that tried to explain why they are created (by human beings themselves, in Hume’s opinion) and why people are so ready to believe in them. This is an important field of study, as with greater knowledge of the character of physical law, one finds more and more (rather than less) accounts of miracles being touted as exceptions to natural laws.... [tags: Empiricists, Empiricism]
1579 words (4.5 pages)
- In his work An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume outlines the problems inherent to the large body of philosophy he describes as the “accurate and abstract” philosophy, and in particular to metaphysical speculations. Seeing that many of the philosophers who endeavor in this heavy metaphysical speculation (Aristotle, Locke and Malebranche being particular examples) fall into errors that lead to absurd or counter-intuitive conclusions, Hume hopes to limit metaphysical speculation to a realm where it is less prone to such a fate.... [tags: HUme's Model of the Mind]
1552 words (4.4 pages)
- The way in which a concept comes to exist in one’s mind is itself a concept worth examining. Many philosophers have looked for the origin of thought in the human mind, and many different reasons for this origin have been put forth. As a philosopher, it is only fitting that Hume would propose his own framework for human thinking. For Hume, perceptions are developed either as the understanding of the outside world, or as recollections of these events or alterations of these memories within the mind¹.... [tags: Empiricists, Empiricism, 2015]
1294 words (3.7 pages)
- In Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion we are introduced to three characters that serve the purpose to debate God and his nature, more specifically, what can mankind infer about God and his nature. The three characters; Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes all engage in a debate concerning this question and they all serve the purpose of supporting their views on the subject. It is the “argument from design” put forth by Cleanthes that is the focal point of the discussion, and it is Demea and Philo who attempt to discredit it.... [tags: Hume Religious Essays]
1522 words (4.3 pages)
- When giving our presentation on the Inquiry Model to the class, our objectives were to define what the inquiry model is, inform the class about the importance of inquiry, identify the outcomes of inquiry, explain how it differs from other approaches, and explain the benefits. We felt like going over these aspects would give the class a clearer and better understanding of the topic. Our opening statement was giving the class a clear-cut definition of what the Inquiry Model means. It contains many different things in the definition.... [tags: Inquiry-based Learning]
1141 words (3.3 pages)
- Cause and Effect in David Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding In An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume states, “there is not, in any single, particular instance of cause and effect, any thing which can suggest the idea of power or necessary connexion” (Hume, 1993: 41). Hume establishes in section II that all ideas originate from impressions that employ the senses (11). Therefore, in order for there to be an idea of power or “necessary connexion,” there must be impressions of this connection present in single instances of cause and effect; if there are no such impressions, then there cannot be an idea of “necessary connexion” (52).... [tags: Philosophy Religion Essays]
853 words (2.4 pages)