Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
history of personal hygiene
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: history of personal hygiene
Industrial hygiene is not a subject that is new to the workplace. “There has been an awareness of industrial hygiene since antiquity. The environment and its relation to worker health was recognized as early as the fourth century BC when Hippocrates noted lead toxicity in the mining industry (OSHA 3143 - Industrial Hygiene)”. Earlier scientists and scholars, long before modern society like, the German scholar, Agricola, who invented the idea of wearing a protective mask for workers and introduced the concept of mine ventilation to protect the miners, Bernardo Ramazzini “the father of industrial hygiene”, Ulrich Ellenborg and many others begin to take notice of how the environment was having an effect on the worker’s health and well-being (OSHA 3143 - Industrial Hygiene). There was a new-found devotion and dedication to finding out the causes of the workplace illnesses of the time. Scientist and scholars set out to discover why workers were developing disease and sickness and what could be done to prevent or control the discomfort they were experiencing. Not only the discomfort of workers but also the families in these mining communities. There is a science and an art to approaching these problems and coming up with solutions. There was …show more content…
The impact on how hazards are recognized and evaluated and how to manage exposure and how exposure is dangerous teaches that anything entering the body has the potential to be harmful at some level that is deemed excessive. IH has great bearing on the control methods used from the design stage of a plant, factory or work area during the engineering phase to the training and administrative stage to the proper wearing of protective equipment all done to create a safe work environment (Plog, 1988) in order of
McGuire, C. (2011, April). Workplace Safety 100 Years Ago. Safety Compliance Letter(2524), 1-6. Retrieved April 22, 2014, from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=60166397&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Workers, tempted by "high wages and short days", tended to disregard the problems the associated with high exposure of copper sulfate and the constant presence of a blue-green stain on clothes and skin in order to support themselves and their families (124). The workers, plagued by the health problems caused by exposure, were further insulted when companies decided to replace them aerial crop dusting (198-199). Now, not only were they chronically ill, but out of work, as well. Worker 's housing and condition was usually subhuman, lacking plumbing and electricity (155), with companies doing the bare minimum to improve. The term "subhuman" may be seen as a bias term, due to my modern upbringing; but electricity and plumbing were readily available in the 1950 's when these reports surfaced. According to Soluri, " a significant number of packing plants lacked basic amenities as late as 1974"
English textile factories were very bad for the health of the working class families. As Dr. Ward stated, “Last summer I visited three cotton factories with Dr. Clough of Preston and Mr. Barker of Manchester, and we could not remain ten minutes in the factory without gasping for breath...¨ This shows that the conditions were so bad that they had trouble breathing because how bad the air was. Dr. Ward also says, ¨Cotton factories are highly unfavourable, both to the health and morals of those employed in them. They are really nurseries of disease and vice. These factories were very unsafe and you could get many diseases and injuries, especially if you were a kid as a lot were. The kids were in many accidents in the factories, as Dr. Ward states,
Western Australian Department of Education. (2010). Occupational Safety and Health. WA: Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.det.wa.edu.au/policies/detcms/policy-planning-and-accountability/policies-framework/policies/occupational-safety-and-health.en?bbp.s=9&bbp.e=select&bbp.v=4&bbp.i=d0.1&bbp.8.policyID=10918572&g11n.enc=UTF-8&bbp.9.pane=0
Work in the mills was hard and dangerous. The men worked from six to six, seven days a week. One week on day shifts and one week on night shifts, at the end of every shift the workers worked twenty-four hours. When the men worked the long shift they where exhausted, this made it fatally easy to be careless. Accidents were frequent and the employers did little or nothing to improve the conditions that the workers h...
Four body fluids that would be considered biohazardous waste are blood, semen, vaginal secretions, and cerebral spinal fluid.
...lothing and equipments in the industry. These will greatly ensure the safety of the employees and hence minimize the injuries. Use of the administrative control and work practices will also lead to the production of quality products safe for consumption (OSHA Quick take, 2010).
P1 Describe the key features of relevant regulations on health and safety as applied to a working environment in two selected or a given engineering organization
Working on a farm or in a factory has both similarities and differences, but moving from a rural to a city job could be quite difficult. Farm and factory jobs are similar because they are dangerous and require intense physical labor. Both the farm and factory jobs have daily hazards. In 2009, farming continues to be the most dangerous job in the United States, due to the constant risk of animal stampedes or agricultural machinery accidents. In factories, like Grede Foundries, ear and eye protection against deafening crashes and flying sparks is required, as well as having all skin covered to prevent from hot metal burns. However, the most noticeable similarity is the amount of physical labor needed in both Wauwatosa and Elkhorn workplaces to produce the goods sold. One example of this in history is five year old Salvin from Brown’s Mills, New Jersey. In 1910, this young boy labored in the fields, becoming weak from lugging two pecks of cranberries at a time in extreme heat. Similar physical labor is demanded of factory workers in United States history, causing numerous health problem...
The working conditions in factories were so bad during this time that it often led to sickness, injuries and death. People who worked in mines had to face many dangerous disadvantages every day. The working conditions in mines were very unsafe, with top rock falling on top of workers, often crushing them to death. The powder, smoke, and bad air caused miners to suffer from lung diseases such as “black lung”. Children also began to work in mines and lost their education at young ages. These children often developed health issues such as “miners’ asthma” due to the bad air in the mine. Not only was the work laborious and dangerous, but miners also received low pay. The majority of profits went to those who owned the mine (Doc 1).
...onishing that her employer did not provide the necessary equipment to protect herself, even though her work was in a noisy environment. Moreover, despite being a weaver, she was forced to stand during her job, which could be done sitting, due to the circumstances controlled by her employer. However, Susan was not the only one subjected to this; Cobbett, in his political register, describes the awful condition general factory workers was faced with [10]. He writes that factories were "cramped", the temperature "hovered around eighty degrees" and workers were not allowed to take breaks. These working conditions would result in transfer of diseases, hyperthermia and possibly death by exhaustion. Hence, it is apparent that the workers did not have a good environment to work in, rather, the conditions adversely affected their health in both the short and the long run.
In the past, the poor conditions and mistreatments had a negative impact on English textile factory workers, because they got sick, injured, and weren’t fed and cared for correctly. In the factories, the children worked long hours, the air wasn’t clean, the machines were dangerous, and it was filthy. In many of these, the workers worked for about ten to fifteen hours everyday; hours that no kid should ever have to work. The air inside the factories was highly contaminated and it was hot in there, so much that you had to gasp for air every couple of minutes in order to bear staying inside (Ward, 1819). The air affected the health by damaging the lungs, causing asthma, damaging other respiratory system parts, and could’ve caused cancer. In fact,
A hazard is defined as an activity or object that has the potential to cause harm if contact is made with the person, object or activity (MHS, 1996; Harmse, 2007; HSE, 2006). These hazards in a work place need to be identified and dealt with accordingly to prevent any harm to employees or any individual acquainted to a certain activity or establishment. The key roles and principles of occupational hygiene are Anticipation, Identification, Evaluation and Control (Schoeman and van den Heever, 2014; Harmse, 2008; SAMTRAC, 2012). To practise in accordance to the above principle; a hazard identification and risk assessment needs to be conducted. Anticipation is the foreseeing of the activity
Chemical and fire hazards in the workplace cause serious injuries that in most cases are fatal.
Nowadays, most of the people were suffer ill-health caused by the workplace rather than suffer to