Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Law 101 obligation and contract
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Law 101 obligation and contract
Section 5 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is perhaps one of the most important sections governing Law of Contractual Obligations in India. It deals with revocation of offer and acceptance. It reads as follows: “A proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards. An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.” An agreement takes place when two parties agree to the same thing in same manner. In other words, meeting of minds is important. But if a person, after making a proposal, feels a need to amend the original proposal or withdraw the proposal, he should be free …show more content…
v. Van Tienhoven & Co. [(1880) 5 CPD 344]. According to J. Lindley, a state of mind which is not ratified cannot be regarded in dealing between man and man and a revocation that has not been communicated bears no force in practical purposes and in the eyes of law. He emphasized that any other conclusion would produce extreme injustice and inconvenience. Offer is not withdrawn merely by acting inconsistently with the subject-matter of it. Notice of revocation must be given and this must reach the offeree, mere posting of the letter will not suffice the purpose. Notice of revocation shall be seemed to have been served when it reaches the offeree’s address. This position was upheld in the case of Tenax Steamship Co. Ltd. V. Owners of the Motor Vessels Brimnes [1974] All ER 88, CA. In this case, a notice for the withdrawal of a shipfrom the charterers’ services was sent by telexand was received by the plaintiff’s telex machine during normal business hours, but the plaintiff read the message the next day. He was, however, held bound by the notice when his machine received it. The situation would have been different in the case if the telex reached the plaintiff’s office after the office hours, then it would have been considered to be communicated on the next working
letter; the court refused, by a vote of 92 to 17, and was dismissed. The
Until the 16th century, Aboriginal people were the only inhabitants of what is now Canada, hence, they were an independent and self-governing people till the Europeans had the capacity to dominate Canada's original inhabitants and possessors (Elias 1). The European Invasion brought about The 1876 Indian Act, which was developed over time through separate pieces of colonial legislation regarding Aboriginal peoples across Canada such as the Gradual Civilization Act of 1857 and the Gradual Enfranchisement Act of 1869. In 1876, these acts were consolidated as the Indian Act (Hanson). This essay aims to explain how the Indian Act tried to destroy the Aboriginal culture through residential schools and unequal recognition of women, successive acts,
(A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had an opportunity to participate;
Court will be announced. I believe that the case should be held at a later date
No, the court granted a petition for review, vacated the order of the FCC, and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The case will be brought to a new trial and the first ruling will be reversed. The case will be compared to prior cases and a ruling made that reflects those of similar cases in order to determine if the policy was well reasoned.
Contractual agreement has always been viewed in terms of offer and acceptance. The universal principle to contract law has always been parties may get into an agreement in whichever way they deem fit and they are subject to certain terms as they choose. As far as legal requirements vital to their formation are binding contracts may be formed. Moreover a binding agreement may be manifested in terms of writing or in verbal form.
It occurs in six ways. Revocation Rejection by the offeree. Lapse of time Occurrence of a terminating condition.
This judgment given set criterion which is still been used in the modern court system and due to this case it was developed that an offer of contract can be unilateral and doesn’t have to be made to a specific party only. Also it was developed to that the acceptance of an offer does not require a notification and that once the concerned party purchases the product the contract is active then and there itself. And it was also established that purchase of an item is a fine example of consideration and therefore makes it a valid contract. (Smith, 2000).
Breach of a contract – failure or refuse to perform than the contract has been breach than the other party has the right to terminate the contract.
LAW: Section 5.077 of property Code, which provides buyers with the amount paid and remaining payments under contract, was broken, allowing The Nguyens to use their statutory right, a right granted under the property code, to end the contract. Subchapter D's cancellation-and-rescission, which states that one has to give the seller a timely notice and offer to tender to the property due to any of the sellers’ benefits derived. Because Morton’s restitution was not considered, he was granted a petition for review.
If they post the rules of acceptance received by mail, the acceptance will be made on the post itself. This rule is an exception to the basic rule that acceptance must be communicated post on time. This rule applies even if the letter is lost in the post or never arrives at anyone. However, the letter should be addressed properly. If not, the reception will only be made when it is received. Postal regulations apply, including the receipt of a telegram or cable.
Ltd. et al. v. Letain in 1963 Supreme Court of Canada. The optionee Conwest Exploration Co. Ltd. was promised an extended deadline for processing internal arrangement for incorporation by the optionor Letain. With the gratuitous promise from the optionor, the optionee carried on their steps towards incorporation. Later on, the optionee was told to revert back to the original date stated in the contract, thus they applied for relief on the grounds of equitability. (Marston, 2008, pp.92-93) As a result, “The court found that that it would inequitable to revert to the strict interpretation of the contract and therefore estopped the optionor from enforcing the date specified in the contract.”(Marston, 2008, pp.92-93). Likewise, the contractor in the second case will be refused to enforce the conditions in the contract and thus will not be able to terminate the contract as
A contract is an agreement between two parties in which one party agrees to perform some actions in return of some consideration. These promises are legally binding. The contract can be for exchange of goods, services, property and so on. A contract can be oral as well as written and also it can be part oral and part written but it is useful to have written contract otherwise issues can be created in future. But both the written as well as oral contract is legally enforceable. Also if there is a breach of contract, there are certain remedies for that which are discussed later in the assignment. There are certain elements which need to be present in a contract. These elements are discussed in the detail in the assignment. (Clarke,
Since Carlill V Carbolic, acceptance has developed and can be achieved in various ways: in writing, oral or it may be inferred by conduct (lisa sturgreon). This requirement of complete performance was emphasised in Daulia V Four Millbank Nominees Ltd [1978] where Goff LJ stated: ‘I think the true view of a unilateral contract must in general be that the offeror is entitled to require full performance of the condition he has imposed and short of that he is not bound’ (see more Paul Richards). Furthermore, there is no need to give advance notice of such acceptance to the
Abrogation literal meaning is removing or transferring of something, but its technical meaning is an abrogation or lifting (raf’) of religious regulation by another religious regulation of a later time, this involving direct commands and preventions or prohibitions. Abrogation can be come through following Islamic sources; it can be come by a Qur’anic statement, Hadith statement and through the Ijma statement, but Ijma cannot abrogate the text and abrogation is not permitted by analogy in addition to that analogy cannot also abrogate by another analogy. The legitimacy of abrogation has been confirmed by the holly Qur’an, Allah (S.W.T) said in Surah Al-Baqarah 106, “We do not abrogate any ayah or verse except that we bring or replace for one better than it or parallel to it”. The abrogating text Qur’an or Hadith, is called Naasikh, whereas the revoked rule called Mansuukh.