More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between the British and European Union
The relationship between the British and European Union
The relationship between the British and European Union
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Right here in the twenty-first century people all around the world have the opportunity to witness not just local but international problems. One international problem is the British referendum, the referendum has the opportunity to change not only the world economy but also world relations between nations. “A referendum is basically a vote in which everyone (or nearly everyone) of voting age can take part, normally giving a "Yes" or "No" answer to a question. Whichever side gets more than half of all votes cast is considered to have won." The British referendum problem all starts with it first appearing in 1975 after the British had shortly joined the European Union and a referendum was issued with the final vote resulting in the British …show more content…
With so many problems present in this referendum, Britain has made some demand for changes to be made and they came up with a list addresses the areas that the British want to cover. The British demanded that the European Union will maintain its single-market system and not impose policies that would discriminate against Britain for not adopting the euro. A few other demands were a cut in regulations and bureaucracy, exemption from commitment to pursue greater integration among European Union countries, and an increased role for national parliaments in the union’s decision-making. As well as an agreement to let Britain limit welfare benefits for European migrants for four years after they arrive in the country (Castle and Erlanger). After hearing all of those demands, the other countries that are in the European Union did not like that, especially the migrant since the EU views all citizens as equals. With the demands set in place and other countries in the European Union set with their view of the migrant this arises with the problem of a split EU and Britain. Britain right now is a country that is torn by colliding ideas. With those two sides having differing ideas they will also have different outcomes if they get their way, each having different pros and cons to …show more content…
But sadly it has been the only solution proposed between both sides, the European Union has stood their ground and hasn 't tried coming up with a solution. With the set of demands in mind, I think that if they were modified a bit then there could be a potential closing on the demand and referendum. The European Union has stated that the proposal that Prime Minister Cameron came up with is “highly problematic, as they touch upon fundamental freedoms of our internal market,” and says that the migrant presented by the Prime Minister is a “direct discrimination between E.U. citizens clearly falls into this last category,” (Castle and Erlanger). The way I see it is that if the European Union and British Prime Minister were to sit down properly in a some meetings that are spread out across in a course of a few days, then they could potentially work out a deal and find out what they both disagree and agree on. At the current progress rate, the two sides are taking they will get little done. But if the two sides were to meet in person with each other they could talk out the problems and try coming up with a middle ground that will work both the European Union and Britain. But if the two sides don’t find a middle ground soon or come up with a solution for this problem, then Britain will most likely leave and with the
Should America have compulsory voting? In my opinion, compulsory voting is a good way to increase the voting turnout. People currently don't like to vote because they don't have the time, or are just too lazy. If the government gives them an incentive then they will be happy to take time off to vote. Also, a reason to fear not to vote should be installed, like an annoying fine. When only a few people vote, the voter satisfaction is low. But when everyone puts their idea in, the satisfaction rises because the actual majority will win.
Although Scotland and the Northern Ireland areas returned a majority vote to stay in the EU, the overall population of the UK returned a majority vote in favor of the UK exiting the EU. On March 29, 2017, Prime Minister May invoked Article 50 beginning the two-year period of negotiations with a set exit date of March 29, 2019. Each of the UK and the EU has a team of four key negotiators for detailed negotiations; however, the draft deal will need to receive an approval of at least 20 countries with at least 65% of the EU populations, and it will need to be ratified by the European Parliament. On September 25, 2017, Prime Minister May delivered a speech in Italy that addressed some UK proposals for negotiations. One proposal is to allow for a two-year transitional period post Brexit during which the UK will remain under EU laws, including paying into the EU’s budget, and the UK will remain under all EU treaties. In response to the speech, a few EU members made statements indicating that the UK must provide clarity pertaining to three key topics: Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland’s border, rights of EU nationals residing in the UK post Brexit, financial settlement of exiting terms. The fifth round of negotiations is currently underway with little or no progress being accomplished as of date. Without an agreement a
The United Kingdom, in the next year the people will get a chance to choose their countries’ fate in whether the United Kingdom should leave the European Union. What makes this important is that it would be the first country to leave the European Union in a time when other European countries are either in negotiation or planning to join so it would be a big deal as the United Kingdom is Europe’s third largest economy. As the people are about to vote on their future, there are concern as what would be the economical, social, and political consequences while for some what would be the benefit if the United Kingdom leave. Today In the next paragraphs I would explore the United Kingdom in the European Union and the Political economical and social
I think the author's purpose is showing how it is unfair how britain is leaving the EU when it is in already poor shape. There perspectives shows how they most likely don't like what the EU is doing to countries.
On June 23, 2016, the UK voted to withdraw from the European Union, raising many questions about the future of clinical trials. However, Brexit wasn’t the beginning of the conversation, and it certainly isn’t the end.
Over the years the main parties in Scotland have different position about Scottish devolution, so the success of pro-devolution forces in the 1997 referendum was thank to a cross-party support within the campaigns for Scottish self-government. During the 1997 election Scotland was promised a referendum on devolution by the Labour Party, what was carried out in 1997 four months after the general election. The process of devolution started, leading to a Scottish Parliament based in Edinburgh coming into being in 1999.
Shockingly, we just witnessed one of the biggest political earthquake in 21st century. After the Brexit poll on June 23rd, 2016, 51.9% people voted “leaving the European Union” compared to 48.1% voted to stay, which means UK has no other choices but withdraw from the European Union. This political earthquake may not only affect UK and EU for sure, but also influence the entire world. Although in class after our discussion we all agree on that there are lots of problems resulting from Brexit. It’s really hard to allege Brexit is a terrible decision, otherwise the majority of UK citizens will not vote for exit. So what are the costs or benefits of Brexit? I will analyze these benefits and costs from different perspective including political,
To enable Britain to fulfil its part of the United Kingdom’s responsibilities within the European Union.
The European Union (EU) is fundamentally democratic and is evident through its institutions, however, the current democratic electoral structure is of great concern. The EU is a new type of political system, often referred to as a sui generis, implying its uniqueness as there exists and a non comparable political body. The EU can neither regarded as a ‘state’ nor as an ‘international institution’ as it combines supranational as well as intergovernmental characteristics (Hix, 1999, p7). In this regard it has developed its own understandings of what democracy is. It is evident that the development of and spread of democracy is a central concept and foundation to all politics within the EU, and remains focuses on makings its governing institutions “more transparent and democracy”. The recent Eurozone crisis, it’s associated anti-crisis measures and the recent enlargement of EU have however re-invigorated debate about the EUs democratic legitimacy. At the heart of the debate are discussions not about whether the EU is an all-encompassing democratic institution but rather what are ‘democratic deficits’ or the democratic shortcomings that exist within this powerful economic and political union. Underpinning these divisions as Schmitter argues, are different understandings of what democracy is in the modern context and more specifically in the unique context of the EU. This essay will argue that the EU presents a unique type of political system that is fundamentally democratic, however, there are democratic shortcomings within its procedural and institutional structure.
The Brexit campaign was based on fear of Middle Eastern migrants entering the country due to the EU’s free movement of Europeans and promises to spread refugees amongst European countries. Activists declared “We want our country back’. This sentiment was echoed by various British citizens. One citizen, Clive a taxi driver from seaside Margate saw his country as changing too much. Clive described that foreigners were filling his towns schools and declared that the neighboring town Cliftonville was so filled with migrant gypsies it was like being in Romania. These concerns over changing ethnic identity catapulted the leave campaign to victory. This caused opponent of Brexit Prime Minister David Cameron to resign and be replaced by Theresa May (League of Nationalists 2016, 4-5). May now has the task of leading the United Kingdom after Brexit. May must now decide if she will continue economically beneficial trade agreements at the expense at allowing immigration (Mind Your Step 2016, 1). The situations in the United Kingdom and Hungary have parallels to German nationalism of the 19th
Lelieveldt, H. and Princen, S. 2011The politics of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Europe has a history of war and conflict that predates living memory and the idea of a united Europe is something that appears repeatedly in that history. Hitler, Napoleon, and the many Roman Emperors all sought a united Europe. Their quests although in many ways motivated by a horrifying desire for power sparked the minds of philosophers and other political thinkers to imagine Europe united in harmony and peace despite national differences. Today we have the European Union which is quite unique. After the horrors, bloodshed, and economic disaster of the twentieth century, in a desire for peace and harmony and economic and political prosperity twenty-seven states have limited their national sovereignty.2 With national interests and ambition still in mind these countries see the European Union and supranational governance and the benefits of peace and prosperity therein as something worthwhile. However, in the history of European integration there has been much conflict and Euroskepticism. Some see unity in diversity and diversity in unity as impossible, and the existence of differentiation in the EU as highly problematic. However, differentiation in the European Union’s integration process is not the hindrance it is often defined as, rather it creates further cooperation in Europe bringing the European Union closer to its objectives of peace, and economic and political growth, resulting in a more effective and efficient bureaucracy. Differentiation in the EU’s integration process has created more successful integration as it allows the nations who wish t...
On the one hand, without international relations from the EU, Britain is economically and socially vulnerable. While Britain’s exit from the EU may define Britain’s power according to British citizens, the type of power that matters is relative power, which is the power when it is being compared to other states. If the other states do not recognize Britain as a force of power, then its exit from the EU is pointless. On the other hand, by discontinuing the benefits granted by the EU, Britain declines the assistance that could have helped the country to become more powerful. In other words, Brexit decreases a source of gathering power for Britain, since the EU not only offers economic opportunities, but it also provides useful information so that the member states can behave accordingly. Overall, realism suggests that while Brexit increases Britain’s confidence in being powerful, it also decreases the country’s power in a way.
The United Kingdom was a member of the European Union. The European Union is an example of the second most integrated arrangement, the economic union. Therefore, voting to leave is a direct effort to reverse regional economic integration.
would decline all its influence in EU rules, and it will stop following them, also the financial services passport will remain, but over time it values remain. Also Britain will contributes to EU budget, but will pay less, than countries in EU. But this scenario have few problems, first in that case Britain will have to get concessions not only in pro- migration Ester Europe, but also from France and Netherlands, , which do not want to set a precedent for anti-EU populists. Also, second problem, that it could be not enought for Britain. Because EU thinks, that they can find compromise, just then when it is on carefully limited migration curbs. And also, EU wants that Britain will be a rule-taker on the single market, and listen and follow EU on everything from financial services to digital policy. Also this scenario could be that , relations between Britain and the EU would be strained, but solid enought to agrre on tariff transition, and also agree trade terms. Also it is clear that Eu and Brtiain will not agrred on sovereignty or immigration, because the price is to high, and they will not find solution which will be good for both sides. But it is big chance that agreement on trading, will be successful, because if not both side will have