Inadequcies of Language in the Gospels

1321 Words3 Pages

The word gospel simply means good news. The purpose of the gospels? To give it’s readers reason after reason to believe in it’s words. Faith is not without reason, just as reality cannot exist without language. Historically, the very existence of the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John merely provide historical evidence of a man of importance that walked this Earth known as Jesus of Nazareth; which is little less historically accurate due to the somewhat differentiating recollections. The four gospels offer varying accounts of Jesus’ short life and even shorter ministry. The gospels dictate the different aspects of Jesus’ life, his supposed miracles, and many parables. However, because of the varying accounts of the language surrounding each purposed act in Jesus’ life the reader is often left more perplexed about his reality than when they started reading. The gospels of Luke and John, primarily, attempt to retell the story of Jesus and make a written account of his acts rather than continue to simply pass it on via oral traditions. Unfortunately, the inadequacies of language and thus the blurred line between language and reality require a closer examination of the gospels in order to determine it’s adherence to reality.

Why are there four Gospels instead of just one? According to the early Catholic Church, the Matthew wrote his account first in Hebrew, the language of the earliest disciples. Then Luke accompanied the Apostle Paul in his ministry to the Gentiles, and wrote his Gospel in a different language, Greek. Later Mark wrote what he REMEMBERED hearing at the Apostle Peter’s feet. And finally the elderly John wrote his account to add another account for the Church. The four Gospels according to Matthew, Mark, Luke...

... middle of paper ...

...r, but also the action of rising out of the water itself. Furthermore, Luke inserts a comment that Jesus was praying almost as a way of downplaying the importance of his baptism.

It is evident by the examination of this one event in both gospels that the language used is entirely inadequate to create an unblemished reality of Jesus’ existence. Instead of providing two accounts of the same event and creating a greater sense of understanding, the language used rather creates more confusion than understanding. It is unfortunate in this regard because the varying accounts should create a more identifiable reality concerning Jesus’ ministry instead of inspiring more uncertainty. The inadequacies of language in the gospels and thus the blurred reality of Jesus’ life require a closer examination of the gospels in order to determine it’s actual adherence to reality.

More about Inadequcies of Language in the Gospels

Open Document