Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
negative impacts of drug testing at schools
impact of drug testing in schools
negative impacts of drug testing at schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: negative impacts of drug testing at schools
In an effort to make drug testing for employees of the federal government more accurate, to deter false positives and false negatives it has been suggested to use alternative methods of testing. The Associated Press reported a movement by the federal government to "overhaul its employee drug testing program". (TAP, pg 1) Currently, the government tests its employees during the pre-employment selection and when accidents
occur on the job. Both instances use urine testing and this particular test in not 99.99% guaranteed to show true results; when the drug was consumed or how much is currently in the employees system. The federal government is looking to lower cost and also prevent persons who are tested from being able to use the "cheat" (TAP, pg 1) method. Diluting the sample obtained, refusing the test and other methods are commonly used by employees to deter the true results of the test. They explained "even though employees can be tested at any time the instances of the tests are generated by the severity of the position the employee holds". (TAP, pg 2) Federal employees may be working at a site requiring hard hats and maneuvering heavy machinery or are behind a desk crunching numbers; the decision to test the individual is derived from upper management.
The main focus for the federal governments revamping of drug screening to be able to better determine the timeframe in which the drugs were used and the accuracy of the test. Also, the idea of the new test is to deter workers from finding ways around testing positive and also to stop the inaccuracies of falsely discrediting workers. As they explain with "testing workers' hair, saliva and sweat, testers are able to draw more accurate conclusions which will lessen the false positives" (TAP, pg 2) this will enable the employer to decide if the drug usage did affect or cause the outcome of the negative actions. Hesitation from the federal government to put these tests in place is also derived from the idea that the alternative tests would provide the employers with unnecessary information as to the timeframe of consumption (TAP, pg 1) thus giving them the upper hand in taking and "cheating" the test. At this point, it is under review for how far a company can go with drug testing without infringing on workers privacy. Because testing urine for illegal substances for example can not differentiate between consumption of marijuana for same day usage or five days before an incident occurs.
Job skills and training can even be investigated by the employer. The employee is to perform services and these services must be done in a certain manner. Someone who is incoherent because of drug abuse cannot be a pilot for example. This is why employers can test to see if characteristics or tendencies would affect performance. An employee may not want to give a urine or blood sample. The employee may not want to include all of their references but this is besides the fact that an employer is entitled to them. More and more employers are starting to feel this way. "A 1996 survey by the American Management Association found 81 percent of major U.S. companies had drug-testing programs at that time compared with 78 percent in 1995 and just 22 percent in 1987." (May 2) The employer has a right to only certain information and the line must also be drawn in the procedure to obtain the information.
...ult, and some times it does not give a result at all. It is unfair because it only targets certain workers; mainly low wage employees. It is unjust because people are automatically accused of using drugs, and that is why the drug test is given. Drug testing should not be abolished, but it should be a more controlled issue since it is something everyone in the US must go through.
"States Consider Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients." FoxNews.com - Breaking News | Latest News | Current News. 26 March 2009. Web. 31 January 2011
...nything at all. If this were to happen, then there would be no point in the faculty that is under the influence being be paid when they’re being a bad influence on kids. Many other jobs drug test their employees. It should be like any other job.
In manufacturing industries where huge machinery, heavy equipment are used, employees are told to do drug testing to ensure safety, and legible to work. In some small business where safety concerns are less it is not important to undergo drug testing. There are 5 types of employment drug testing : pre-employment testing, on duty random testing, reasonable suspicion testing, post accident testing, return to work and follow-up testing. Pre-employment testing is done to ensure that the person applying for the job is not using any drugs that may negatively affect the performance of the organization. Different methods of drug testing are : urine drug testing, hair follicle drug testing, saliva drug testing, etc. In On duty random testing an employer tells the employees that they may have to submit to drug testing at any time while on duty. Reasonable suspicion testing is done when an employee shows physical behavior that attributes to use of drugs or alcohol. Post accident testing should be done as soon as possible after an accident, if the employer has reasonable suspicion that the person may be involved in use of drugs or alcohol. Return to work and follow up testing is done to ensure the fitness to return to work.
In today’s world, drug testing in the workplace is a very controversial topic amongst workers and employers. Employers want to have reliable and safe workers, and the employees want to have their privacy and be given trust that they believe to be an essential part of the employer/employee relationship. However, with the economic downfall people will do almost anything to get hired and get paid. With this fact, it makes it more difficult for employers to find good reliable workers who aren’t going to cause trouble while at work or miss work because of bad decisions or lifestyle choices. To create and ensure trust in the work environment, some employers might require drug testing prior to getting the job. Testing the employees and applicants
In my opinion, a company has the right demand or ask new employees to do a drug test before they start working, so they can make sure that everyone is safe. Now the utilitarian opinion considers that drug testing breaks the privacy of a person, but since it helps the company, the employees, the employee him or herself, then it is logical to ask for this kind of examination. For example, if a truck driver is going to work for a trucking company where he has to drive, then, of course, he has to do the required tests to make sure that everyone is protected and no one is in danger when he drives. We know that it is a requirement for all drivers by the state law to do their drug test and to have the results sent to the company and the driver, but
Mandatory drug testing in public schools is a relatively recent practice that stems from rising concerns over the rate of drug addiction among young people. It involves analyzing student urine samples for the presence of various illegal substances, such as amphetamines and marijuana. Mandatory drug testing programs include both "suspicionless" random testing and "for cause" testing, and can be considered an outgrowth of the "drug war" currently taking place in the United States. Mandatory drug testing in schools is less common than comparable testing in the workplace.
employment drug testing is a sensitive matter because of how to balance productivity demands with how to protect privacy and avoid the discrimination
Drug testing was created many years ago mainly in the workplace for new employers getting a job at places like the hospital or in the
Potter, B. A., & Orfali, S. (1998). Drug testing at work: A guide for employers. Berkeley, CA: Ronin Pub.
Numerous individuals think that being drug tested in a workplace is a violation of their rights. In order to work, drug test should be a requisite because the United States has a substantial amount of people who are involved with drugs. If they have committed a felony because of having any kind of substance, they should be test more than once. In 2007, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health reported that 8.4% (10.2 million) employees, at the age of 18 or older, have been using drugs. When drugs are found in one’s system, they should be immediately reported to the police and help prevent someone from working under the influence. If someone goes to work or is at work not sober, they are more likely to cause an accident. They could harm themselves
Illicit drug use is one of the major public health issues in the United States. This research investigation will study if the presence of preservatives in urine samples will affect the accuracy of a urine drug test, specifically as it relates to workplace drug testing. Typically, when a person is asked by an employer to provide a urine sample, no direct supervision is involved during the collection process. Therefore, employment candidates may attempt to cheat the drug test by adulterating the urine specimen. As a result, it is important for laboratories be able to identify any such adulterated specimen, taking into account the presence of preservatives due to extended shipping times. In this research investigation, common preservatives
Random drug testing in schools has been a controversial and heated topic for a long time. Random drug testing involves a school administration spontaneously picking a student or a group of students on any given day, and testing them for the presence of drugs in their system. Schools usually enforce this policy on any student who either participates in a sport or extracurricular activity through the school, or has a parking pass at the school. The test is commonly done by a urinalysis, where a sample of pee is sent off to a drug testing laboratory to be examined for harmful substances. Many schools have enacted random drug testing for students in the past decade, while there is a large number of schools that do not use the tests. Some believe
Have you ever entered your school to see men in uniform processing drug tests to all students of your school, your friends, and even people you might know who do drugs? Have you ever thought about getting caught if you’ve had taken drugs or alcohol recently?