The Importance Of Vaccination

1255 Words3 Pages

The individual has the right to refuse vaccination. But how does that effect the society the individual lives in? How does this refusal effect the healthcare provider that is trained to nurture and care for life? Is it right to force vaccination on someone? These are all ethical questions raised by the individuals chose for or against vaccinations. Vaccination is a safeguard for not just the individual, but also the vulnerable members of society. If vaccinations are so important for both the individual and society, why would anyone choose to forego vaccination? Could technology and a diverse population play a role in refusal of vaccination? These are all ethical questions raised by the individuals chose to forego vaccination. What, if anything …show more content…

They include Egoism, Virtue Ethics, Deontology, Consequentialism, and Utilitarianism. People often combined the principles to come to a good decision. In this discussion Utilitarianism is utilized. Utilitarianism is defined as “one should act so as to do the greatest good for the greatest number” (Baillie, et al, 2012, p. 4). From this perspective, the healthcare provider has to weigh the right of the individual’s autonomy, and the right of society to be safe. Utilitarianism would require the doctor to do everything in their power to get the patient to agree to vaccination. To do this the healthcare provider would try and educate the patient about the possible (very rear) side effects associated with vaccination. Then inform the patient of the very real risks associated with forgoing vaccinations. Along with providing the patient with places to find their own reliable information (i.e. CDC, Health department). It is also vital that the healthcare professional understand the many reasons the individual is forgoing vaccination. Once this information is known, the healthcare professional can work with other minds of the field to look for other ways to persuade the individual to be vaccinated. Not just for their good, but for the good of everyone. However, in the end if after the patient has been fully informed of all the facts relating to vaccination, they still choose to forgo vaccination the doctor must comply. However, before they comply they would exhaust all the resources available to persuade the patent to do what is in the best interest of not only the patient, but the entire society. As I said there is no clear-cut answer. The best solution is to get everyone involved taking about the problem. While it is not possible to completely satisfy all parties involved, it is possible to strike a balance between all the interested

Open Document