Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why is leadership important
1. Compare and contrast the transactional and transformational leadership
A critique of transformational leadership and transactional leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why is leadership important
Situation:
Brian’s employment lead to a massive change in how things operated in the workplace which could lead to issues in the changeover from styles from staff.
Brian 's inability to stick to a decision and constantly changing his mind and methods.
Brian also does not clearly state what he wants when he asks staff to complete a task which leads to it being performed in a way that does not satisfy him.
Brian also does not motivate staff and congratulate staff when the complete tasks for him.
Brian has not been listing to the feedback he has been receiving from co-workers by denying the request made by senior staff
Putting down his staff to senior management making assumptions about co-workers.
Brains lack of professionalism in his meeting
…show more content…
Leadership in management theory is someone who can use their own ideas and convince others to carry out those ideas effectively. (Robbins,S., Decenzo ,D.,Mary,C.,& Woods,.2016,pg 304) . Many leader carry these types such as transactional leaders which are leaders who use a series of social interactions, which are used to motivate fellow workers to complete goals and transformational leaders , inspire and motivate though big ideas that captivate people and bring them on board to motivate staff and to complete goals (Robbins,S.,Decenzo,D.,Mary,C.,& Woods,.2016,pg 314.) Control is another theory that is the backbone of the many successes and failures of this case study .Control in management is important because it is used to survey activity in the workplace to ensure goals and objectives are met or exceeded (Robbins, S., Decenzo, D., Mary, C., & Woods, .2016, pg 362).Jim utilizes Leadership and control thought his time a manager of this business. Jim was a manager who was viewed positively by his workers and was able to accomplish goals with ease because he had good leadership as transactional leader who got to know his staff and creating good relationships with them. Brian’s leadership stance he takes which does not suit the company is the hands off approach to leadership using his position as a leveraging point to …show more content…
The result of some of Brian’s early decisions from setting impossible tasks to the constant change of mind lead to staff requesting transfers from the department this could have been avoided by listening to the complaints left by the team and adjusting the requirements and methods taken by Brian. During the meeting with upper management the inability to compromise and work out a solution lead to a fight and even a punch, a more civilised approach during the meeting with breaks could help foster more professional discussion and lead to a real solution to the problems happening. The inability for a conclusion to come from the meeting this lead to Brian to stick to the ways of leadership he had been demonstrating which lead to the team splitting up and becoming induvial again which lead to little work done . If a decision was reached in the meeting or even if upper management came down to help monitor and come up with a solution this could have been turned around before some serious damage had been done to the teams trust and motivation which stem from brains poor leadership and
Harold could have also attended the meetings and taken an initiative to ensure that all employees were happy. Roberts should have focused on his own strengths as a leader and could have identified his areas where he was better than Rankle. This way he would have never thought of changing the job. Roberts could have communicated his concerns regarding Rankle with his supervisor and teammates. Rankle should have taken permission and discuss with others about his new ideas. Base on this case study, it is very clear that effective communication is the key factor in the success of any
In a firm, management and leadership are important and needed. Leadership and management are similar. Actually, leadership and management are totally different. The leadership would influence the firm. The leader would have difference leadership styles to lead the subordinate.
In order to mold a group of people into a higher performing team, Kathryn had a challenging task ahead of her. Her plan to hold an offsite retreat with the leadership team was a fantastic idea. This was her first real action as the leader of DecisionTech, and it would soon prove to have a positive impact on the future of the company and the leadership team. Kathryn held firm to the agenda she designed for the retreat despite the team trying to give her suggestions on what they thought the agenda should be. When Martin sent Kathryn an email letting her know he and JR would be missing part of the retreat for a business
Poor communication causes chiefs and officers as much grief as anything. In short, the organization needs to remove its own problems before pointing at individual officers and putting all the blame on them creating stress.
According to the text, “Control is defined as any process that directs the activities of individuals toward achievement of organizational goals. It is how effective managers make sure things are going as planned (Bateman, pp 520, 2007).” The combination of these two concepts, leadership and control help formulate an ideology that becomes an integral part of the success or failure of any business entity. This paper will give Team D an opportunity to delve into Sears Holdings’ leadership and control mechanisms. The focal point of this paper will be to identify the current CEO of Sears Holdings, and gain insight on his background, i.e., training, education, and previous employment. To identify his style of leadership, evaluate the effectiveness of this leadership style based on Sears Holdings’ performance, and to explain the various control mechanisms used in the organization to determine the effectiveness.
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Also he does not believe involving the staff to build a strategy that everyone know and works together to achieve. Strategy is in his head and no one know it. He also changes he opinion every often and this make it hard to be consistent in any approach to key stakeholders and himself. The root cause I believe is that he has never been exposed to the ideas, concept and corporate structure for him to full understand how much value this can bring to the company
Leaders have a responsibility to ensure that the organization is running effectively. In addition, the decisions that are made should be in the best interest of the organization, therefore, the leader should ensure that the decisions are moving the organization closer to its vision. According to Manning and Curtis (2015), there are 10 qualities that influence the leadership process: Vision, Ability, Enthusiasm, Stability, Concern for others, Self-confidence, Persistence, Vitality, Charisma, and Integrity. Leaders have to consider these 10 qualities when making effective decisions about the organization. Conversely, when these qualities do not influence the decision-making process for leaders, the organizational leader is not possessing
The things that made him a “difficult to cope with” leader is that he enforce his employees with his own Eight Commandments, that his employees have to follow. If they don’t follow these commandments he will fire them. An example of his Commandments is “I will tell you only one time”. It’s a very strict commandment and you can expect many employees to follow some unreasonable statements.
They claimed that “he doesn’t listen” and that “he means well, but he has lost touch with the type of leadership his job requires.” Lane’s leadership is where a majority of the problems originate from. Lane likes to control virtually all aspects of the day-to-day operations. Because of this, his employees do not have the opportunity to contribute more to their work than what is minimally required. With the complete control, he also gives his staff little autonomy. When they try to make suggestions, Lane either doesn’t listen, or when a suggestion is implemented, the employees is rarely rewarded, even when the implementation is successful. On the other hand, when a suggestion or other action leads to failure, employees are often criticized instead of given help or other suggestions for improvement. A specific problem occurred when a team was sent to Singapore to participate in a trade fair. But when they returned unsuccessful in gaining new contacts, they were publically criticized for the failure instead of acknowledged for the international exposure that was gained. All of these issues stem from once source – a style of leadership. This is not to say that Lane himself is the problem, but the way he chooses to lead has negative effects on the
Leadership has been defined in different ways, a definitaion of leadership that would be most commonly accepted would be “the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organization…”(House et al., 1999, p. 184 as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 19). After a comprehensive review of different leadership literature, Stogdill (1974, p. 259, as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 18) concluded that “There are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept." Leadership can be viewed from two different angles one is shared influence process and other as a specialized role. Researcher who view leadership as a specialized role consider attributes as a factor in selecting a designated leader. On the contrast, theorist who emphasises on influence process considers “Leadership” as a social process or a pattern of relationship.
The comments and scores indicate staff is unhappy with office communication. Currently, he communicates any problems he feels need to change. Also he does not like e-communication or meetings.
David Fletcher was not experienced in human resource management or the fundamentals of running an effective team. He had not be...
Paul Evans should not have been allowed to report information to Gable before reporting to Gary because Gary was the head of the project team while Gable was a management support. This fissure in leadership contributed to communication breakdown. Evans knew from experience that Gable was increasingly manipulative and he needed to manipulate results prior ...
After meeting with the president and listening to the issues and concerns regarding, Jack I would highly recommend for a personal improvement plan (PIP) to be developed. I would suggest for the president to have a one-on-one meeting with Jack regarding the negative feedback he has received from the staff. Jack should be fully aware of the expectations that are being sought as a result of this improvement plan. When laying out the areas of improvement, the first concern would be the negative attitude he has toward his staff. Next, would be to address the several complaints on company surveys from his department as well as outside of his department. These situations take time so I would recommend a 90-day plan with a follow up with the employees immediately after the plan has exhausted. The purpose of the PIP would be to improve employee morale, create a healthier work environment, and assure that the employees are receiving adequate support and resources needed to perform productively. Jack would also be informed of the consequences he could face if he is not compliant and open to this PIP. I would suggest for an outside,