(Three Lessons from Plato’s Dialogue, The Apology)
The trial of Socrates in the year 399 B.C. is a very important piece of history that teaches many lessons. Socrates was accused of being an atheist as well as corrupting the young men in his community. He was tried in a court and found guilty; then consequently required to propose his own penalty, as an alternative to Meletos’ penalty. The court ultimately voted against Socrates’ judgement, and gave him the death penalty. Socrates took it in stride, however, because he was willing to die for something that he believed in. Before he is led to jail, Socrates gives a speech to his accusers and those who voted for his death. He tells of his misfortune in being outrun by death, but tells those who were against him to be fearful of wickedness outrunning them. He knows that he might have been able to die naturally, at his old age of seventy; but he also knows that these men will get what they have coming. Socrates is very firm in his beliefs throughout his apology, and Plato’s explanations show many lessons that Socrates taught with his speeches.
As explained by Plato’s Apology, Socrates seems mostly apathetic toward others’ opinions, which displays a sense of courage. Socrates is not afraid to state what he believes, and stick up for that belief in whatever form possible. This is tremendously proven throughout his entire trial, and finally executed when he dies for what he believes in. It is well-known that the word ‘apology’ has evolved into a different meaning from the times of Plato and Socrates. In their day, the term apology was seen as a way to defend yourself, or an explanation of why you performed certain actions. In today’s times, we know that ...
... middle of paper ...
...ives just as Socrates did. As long as you have faith in whatever or whomever you believe in, you can be as courageous as Socrates was in his death.
Socrates was a true teacher, and left many lessons for us. Plato’s Apology gave just a few examples of the great teachings of Socrates. Although we may not take each of his lessons literally, we can take them and manipulate into something that fits our own beliefs and goals in life. He was a true teacher in his time, and in modern times as well. He was willing to die what he believed in, and worked with many different techniques in order to pass on what he believed to others. Although he taught his beliefs, he did it in a way that was not invasive to others. His willingness to die for what he believed in is something that everyone can look at and be inspired by. All in all, Socrates was a man of many lessons and trades.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Plato is one of the most famous Greek philosophers who has many published works that contributes to the field of ethics. In many of his philosophical debates, Plato claims that the soul never perishes after death and only the body dies. One of Plato 's famous works that argues for the immortality of the soul is the Socratic dialogue, The Phaedo. In this dialogue, Phaedo is telling the story of Socrates ' death, who appears as the main character in the dialogue. Socrates was executed by drinking poison hemlock after the state of Athens accused him of corrupting the youth.... [tags: Soul, Plato, Socrates, Logic]
1162 words (3.3 pages)
- Is Meno a pompous jerk or is he actually willing to learn. That is the question on my mind at the start of Plato’s dialogue Meno. The truth of it, as it seems, appears to be both. In the dialogue, Meno could be described as rude and abrasive but then later described as inquisitive--searching himself for an answer or answers to the biggest question of his time. Socrates tries his best with his art of conversational thinking and inquiry to push Meno in the direction of self learning. He, in my opinion, falls just short of that place.... [tags: Plato, Virtue, Meno, Question]
706 words (2 pages)
- Socrates could easily be viewed as suicidal due the portrayal put forth in Plato’s Five Dialogues. First, there is the Apology. Numerous times Socrates was given the opportunity to defend himself in a manner that would be persuading to the jury, but he seemed to have sullied each and every chance. A compelling argument for why his actions were not the crimes he was accused of committing was given, yet he did so with harsh logic and never with an appeal to emotions. He believes such appeals, for instance, bringing his family to court, would be beneath him while acknowledging it would have aided his case with, “you will more readily convict a man who preforms these pitiful dramatics in court…... [tags: Suicide, Death, Kamikaze, Plato]
1471 words (4.2 pages)
- Mid-Length Research Paper As evidenced in four of Plato’s early Socratic dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, and Meno, Plato believes that although people are capable of having right opinions regarding virtue, which are acquired by divine intervention, people are incapable of having right knowledge of virtue. Although Plato often relates virtue to knowledge or wisdom, unlike knowledge virtue is unteachable as evidenced by its lack of teachers or moral experts capable of forming a proper definition of virtue.... [tags: Plato, Socrates, Virtue, Platonism]
1825 words (5.2 pages)
- Plato’s Phaedrus deifies traditions and customs of ancient Greek writing. Plato’s narrative uses dialogue to teach the reader about rhetoric and love. Rhetoric as defined by Plato “is the art of moving the soul with words (speeches)”. Plato begins Phaedrus by introducing two characters; Phaedrus, a young man who is interested in becoming a great speaker, and Socrates, an older resident and philosopher of Athens. Plato provides the reader with three speeches each presenting a separate view on the three kinds of lovers.... [tags: Plato, Philosophy, Rhetoric, Dialogue]
709 words (2 pages)
- hen we look throughout the world and its history one can surmise that in any civilized nation there must be a system of justice in order to prevent chaos and anarchy to rule over the land. However, people and society’s construction of what justice is and what constitutes a just act can differ. The historical writing of Aeschylus in the Oresteia and the 3 dialogues by plato Euthyrpo,apology and crito are two works of literature that clearly exemplify different concepts of justice. When we compare both readings we are allowed to draw on some social and political implications of what justice is and what it should be.... [tags: Plato, Socrates, Crito, KILL]
1957 words (5.6 pages)
- Without the slightest of hesitation, many choose to change who they are in order to fit in. A person may change to fit in with a certain group of friends or so they are able to live as the government wants. No matter the situation, the process of change appears to be a daily event. The fact that many speak out so they do not have to change the person they are is a daily event as well, though. This very theme, the importance of individuality, is dominant not only in today's world but in Ray Bradbury's “Fahrenheit 451”, John Knowles’ “A Separate Peace”, and Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet”, also.... [tags: Comparing Life with Literature]
900 words (2.6 pages)
- Persons & Scenery The involved characters are Socrates (the narrator); Glaucon (Plato’s brother); Adeimantus (another brother of Plato’s); Polemarchus; Cephalus; Thrasymachus; Cleitophon; And others who were mute auditors. The scenery is the house of Polemarchus and his father Cephalus at the Piraeus. The dialogue is narrated by Socates the day after it took place to: Timaeus, Hemocates, Critias, and a nameless person. Structure Of The Dialogue Book I of The Republic focus on a passion Socrates had, that is not defining justice in its word meaning, but rather finding out the very nature of justice.... [tags: Philosophy ]
1680 words (4.8 pages)
- The Importance of Thrasymachus in Plato’s Republic Dr. Malters’s comments: This student does two things quite remarkable for an undergraduate student. In his compact essay, not only does he display an in-depth understanding of complex perspectives on justice put forth by the protagonist Socrates, he deftly explains how Plato has artfully made rude objections by a seemingly minor character early in the dialogue function as a structuring device for nearly all the important ideas examined thereafter.... [tags: Plato Republic Essays]
932 words (2.7 pages)
- Plato's Dialogue Dialogue: to exchange and discuss ideas in a frank and open manner to reach a mutually agreed understanding. Dialogue on difficult issues is important to man. People can learn from others by exchanging ideas and expressing how a philosophy or a stand on an issue affects them. Comprehending the needs, feelings, problems and views of others can help create a better future for all. Can we in a society that proclaims the right to free speech participate in a free and open dialogue.... [tags: Papers]
475 words (1.4 pages)