Discourse Analysis In Discourse

1385 Words3 Pages

1.2- Critical Discourse Analysis

CDA considers language as a social phenomenon. Not only individuals, but also institutions and social groupings have specific meanings and values that are expressed in language in systematic ways. In CDA, texts are seen as the relevant units of language in communications, readers and hearers are not passive recipients in their relationship to texts, and there are similarities between the language of science and the language of institutions, and so on. However, a clearer and more general approach to CDA can be found in the work by Fairclough & Wodak (1997). According to them, CDA regards language as social practice and takes consideration of the context of language use to be crucial.
Language is a social practice means that language is a part of society, language is a social process, and language is a socially conditioned process. In Fairclough’s point of view (2001), firstly, language is a part of society in the sense that linguistic phenomena are social phenomena, and vice versa although this relationship is not symmetrical. Whenever people speak …show more content…

According to Teun A.van Dijk in the paper Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity (collected by Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. 2001) considers CDA as a critical perspective, so to speak, discourse analysis with an attitude. It focuses on social problems, and especially on the role of discourse in the production and reproduction of power abuse or domination. Wherever possible, it does so from a perspective that is consistent with the best interests of dominated groups. The term critical in CDA is often associated with studying power relations (Fairclough, 1997). In Language and Power (2001), Fairclough mentions power in discourse and power behind discourse. In terms of power in discourse, discourse is the site of struggle, and in terms of power behind discourse, it is the stake in power struggle – for control over orders of

Open Document