History Of Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway

828 Words2 Pages

The Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway is a large body of water that is used by commercial and private shallow draft vessels. The waterways is maintains by the US Army Corps of Engineers for 1,088 miles between places like Norfolk, Virginia and Miami Florida. The AIWW is authorized to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide through land cuts and 150 feet in open water areas (capca).
The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Albert Gallatin, submitted a comprehensive plan to bring the new nation together with roads and canals system sponsored by the government in 1808 (capca). He came up with this ideal of creating an inland waterway along the Atlantic coast from Boston, Massachusetts, to St. Mary’s, Georgia. The ideal would mainly need the construction of four canals, which was estimated to cost $3 million. He thought that his whole program could be completed in ten years (capca).
From 1907 to 1947 the Atlantic Deeper Waterways Association was organized in Philadelphia to lobby for the construction of an inland waterway from Boston to Key West (capca). In 1947 The entire Intracoastal Waterway continued a series of variously named projects until 1947, when all but the last two of the southern reaches were collectively chosen the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Virginia and St. Johns River, Florida (capca). The ship canals comprising the waterway in the north and the sections between the St. Johns River and Key West continue to stay separate projects. The Deeper Waterways Association was dissolved, its members believing that their work was done.
In 1999 the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Association encouraged the continuation and further development of waterborne market and restoration on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway of places ...

... middle of paper ...

... 4000 jobs alone, without maintenance on the bridge North Carolina lost 1723 jobs (capca).
One of cons of the safety zone is by the coast guard shutting down the movement of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway is that they would put people out of work that depend on the waterway to get there jobs done on the daily bases, like fishermen, cruise ships and shipping companies. This could cause for companies to be faced with economic trouble, which might jeopardizes the companies’ future. With people jobs on the line the safety zone cannot go on for along period of time without causing trouble, this would cause for the people working on the bridge to rush and leave the bridge incomplete or half done. I think the Safety Zone would be the best way to go to complete the bridge project successfully without having any complication or fear of someone tampering with the bridge.

Open Document