The Importance Of Climate Change

1294 Words3 Pages

It has only been a few years since the world’s population surpassed seven billion people. The demand for power production has also grown, with fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil being the primary sources for the production of energy. The burning fossil fuels are the primary source of carbon dioxide. As a result, climate change has proven to be a very important issue in today’s ever-changing society. There have also been numerous advances in the study of climate change. Ever since it was suggested that carbon dioxide could affect climate change, research has proven that fossil fuel consumption is the biggest human contributor to carbon dioxide emissions into the Earth’s atmosphere.
Significant Discovery in the field of Climate …show more content…

He attended the prestigious Cathedral School, Uppsala University in Uppsala, Sweden, and Stockholm University. Arrhenius was the first to use basic principles of physical chemistry to calculate estimates of the magnitude of the extent to which increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide increase Earth 's surface temperature through the greenhouse effect, leading him to conclude that carbon dioxide emissions caused by humans are large enough to cause global warming. Arrhenius’s main contribution to physical chemistry was his theory that electrolytes separated, or dissociated into ions, even when there is no current flowing through the solution. This is known as the theory of ionic dissociation. Extensions of this work would later earn him the Nobel Prize in chemistry in …show more content…

The wealthy and industrial companies were very influential while the Industrial Revolution was taking place, as businesses of automation soared. The production of fossil fuels also gave a lot of influence to the companies that were responsible for producing fossil fuels. Governments around the world were very authoritarian, as evidenced by France being ruled by a monarchy in the early 1800’s. Despite the amount of respect Fourier and Arrhenius had from commanded from their peers due to their research, they did not possess what one would call influential power. Fourier lived in a time that was ruled by Napoleon Bonaparte. Although Fourier was respected by Napoleon, it would be easy to assume that Fourier’s work could be suppressed if Napoleon so decided. I believe these scientists were well respected during these times and had some influence. As a police officer, I do not believe the same respect, admiration, or influence given to the researchers would have been afforded to a police officer during those. Industrial companies, the wealthy, and governments who had global connections certainly held more power than a police officer who operated on a local

Open Document