According to Schneier (2015), US government has started spying on American citizens since the 60 's; however, their targets were antiwar activists, civil rights leaders and members of nonviolent dissident political groups. Furthermore, starting from the last decade NSA focused mainly in American Muslims in it 's goal to fight Alqaeda overseas. Also, Schneier (2015) indicated, that instead of focusing only one one citizens category, NSA decided to gather information from all the Americans based on 3 legislation: Executive order 12333 signed by President Reagan (1980), section 213 of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act (2001) which allows NSA to collect and tangible things about anyone not only foreigners and finally section 702 of FISA (Foreigners Intelligence Surveillance Act) Amendments Act (2008).
Regardless of any legislation, governments in general and US government in specific don 't have the right to spy on citizens, especially through social media for three main reasons; first, the freedom of speech right is preserved by the US constitution. Second, any electronic contents are considered as intellectual property of its owners, and finally, people don 't want to feel that they are criminals all the time. In short, under any circumstances, individuals and groups privacy should be protected and governments should not monitor their social networking ...
... middle of paper ...
...speech was and still preserved by the constitution. Also, the right of intellectual property which covers most of the data and information people share on the web is yet a federal law and should not be bypassed. Breaking such laws will create a state of fear; people won 't feel safe anymore if they are monitored all the time for no valid reasons. Even if there are people who think that government are monitoring only those people who are considered as a direct threat to the national security; in some of the cases innocent people go arrested because of the mass gathering or data and misinterpreting their actions. Regardless of any other legislation, NSA, DHS and any other government departments don 't have they right to bypass neither the constitution nor the federal laws; government should not disclose people 's data from social media or not from any electronic medium.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Today, individuals are sacrificing privacy in order to feel safe. These sacrifices have made a significant impact on the current meaning of privacy, but may have greater consequences in the future. According to Debbie Kasper in her journal, “The Evolution (Or Devolution) of Privacy,” privacy is a struggling dilemma in America. Kasper asks, “If it is gone, when did it disappear, and why?”(Kasper 69). Our past generation has experienced the baby boom, and the world today is witnessing a technological boom.... [tags: Costs of NSA Surveillance]
3674 words (10.5 pages)
- Is the American government trustworthy. Edward Joseph Snowden (2013) released to the United States press* selected information about the surveillance of ordinary citizens by the U.S.A.’s National Security Agency (N.S.A.), and its interconnection to phone and social media companies. The motion picture Citizenfour (2014), shows the original taping of those revelations. Snowden said that some people do nothing about this tracking because they have nothing to hide. He claims that this inverts the model of responsibility.... [tags: Communications Surveillance, 2015]
1439 words (4.1 pages)
- In the past few years the National Security Agency has been all over the news, and not in a good way. Former contractor of the National Security Edward Snowden leaked classified documents to several media outlets on such a scale the world took notice. The day the world learned about the Prism program among others was June, 5, 2013 when Ed Snowden gave the specifics of the programs to The Guardian, and the Washington Post. Ed Snowden turned those secrets over as a member of the NSA but fled the country before the leaks so he would not be imprisoned by the authorities.... [tags: Domestic Surveillance]
2540 words (7.3 pages)
- Government Surveillance For The Greater Good With new advances in technology each day it’s becoming easier to communicate with each other. Talking to friends and family around the world has now become easier. Yet with all these new forms of communication there have been unpleasant side effects, since this new advanced technology is not only for harmless interaction it is also used to plot against governments and countries. Governments have found themselves under attack and have had to resort to monitoring their citizen’s online and phone activities.... [tags: Governement, Technology]
1663 words (4.8 pages)
- Imagine a world without privacy. Soon, that will be the world you live in. Did you know that every single webpage you visit on the internet is monitored by the National Security Agency. Every single google search, webpage visited, or even your emails, can be accessed, and you wouldn’t even know. Any benefits of surveillance by the NSA are far outweighed by the harms because it is not only unconstitutional and unethical, it is causing self-censorship among journalists, it is expensive, it damages national relations, it increases racial discrimination, and the impact against terrorism is minimal.... [tags: freedom of speech, terrorism, discrimination]
1050 words (3 pages)
- Although an act of cyberterrorism has yet to occur, officials and scholars continuously study the possibilities of such an attack. As our physical and virtual worlds continue to intertwine the risk of such an event rapidly increases. Everything from our transportation systems to pharmaceutical manufacturing are computer controlled. The closest the world has come to an act of cyberterrorism was in 2000. Known as the Maroochy Shire case in Queensland, Australia was committed by Vitek Boden. Boden was an engineer for Pacific Paradise, a sewage pumping in Australia.... [tags: National Security]
1081 words (3.1 pages)
- Government Surveillance Programs Carlos Velez Alliant International University Since the attack on September 11th the United States has amped up their position on domestic and international security that includes not only traditional security but also video, audio, internet and social media applications that reaches across the globe (Sidhu, D. S. 2007). Since the events of 9/11 many Americans have raised concerns about the breaches of privacy, their safety, and the steps that are needed to insure “proper” protocol is established in order for the government to carry their programs.... [tags: United States Constitution]
1192 words (3.4 pages)
- In times of great terror and panic, the citizens of a nation must decide what they value most: their right to privacy or the lives of the innocent. Government surveillance is criticized, however there are times in a nation’s history where, in order to ensure the safety of their citizens, they must surveill the country for potential hazards that might exist in the world. The government-issued program, COINTELPRO--a series of illegal projects during the twentieth century organized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation--while heavily criticized for its unconstitutional grounds--was justified because it benefitted the nation during a period of upheaval.... [tags: Government Surveillance]
2375 words (6.8 pages)
- The National Security Agency was originated, as a unit to decipher code communications during World War I. It is an old and one of the largest US intelligence organization. It operates under the Department of Defense and reports to the Director of National Intelligence. Its responsibility is to guard the US Government Communication and Information system. It accomplishes its mission by bugging electronic systems, using subversive software for sabotaging and intercepting phone conversations and Internet communications of people.... [tags: world war I, US intelligence]
1278 words (3.7 pages)
- Should the U.S. build a National Missile Defense System. “What if free people could live secure in the knowledge that their security didn’t depend upon the threat of instant U.S. retaliation to deter an enemy attack?” Ronald Reagan; 1983 In his speech of March 23, 1983, President Reagan presented his vision of a future where a Nation’s security did not rest upon the threat of nuclear retaliation, but on the ability to protect and defend against such attacks. The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) research program was designed to tell whether, and how, advanced defense technologies could contribute to the feasibility of this vision.... [tags: essays research papers fc]
3323 words (9.5 pages)