Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contrast Fayol with contemporary management theories
Contributions to administrative theory
Essay on henri fayol
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contrast Fayol with contemporary management theories
French mining engineer, Henri Fayol graduated in 1860. He later became the director-general of Comambault, a company who was at the verge of bankruptcy. Fayol successfully reformed the company into one of the largest industrial combines of Europe after his retirement. Fayolism or Administrative theory was developed in 1900s with the focus that management should be considered as an essential skill of life and should be separated from any technical knowledge. He believed that everyone perform certain administrative functions in their everyday lives (Lynch and Robert G., 2013). The theory emphasizes that the success of an organization was determined by the administrative ability of its leader as oppose to their technicality.
Henri Fayol’s written work “Administration Industrielle et Générale” (Revised by Gray, 1987) proposed that there are 5 primary functions of management and 14 principles of management. This was his main contribution to management’s thoughts and practice. “Experiences… are expensive teachers” (Fayol, n.d.), through his understandings over the years in Comambault, Fayol believed that the principle of management could be outlined and taught.
5 Functions of management (Peaucelle & Guthrie, 2013)
1. To Plan
“Gouverner c’est prévoir” (Fayol, 1916) it is important to plan the foreseeable future and determine stages and technology necessary to implement it.
2. To Organize
To provide the organization with all its required tools, supplies, personnel etc. to operate.
3. To Coordinate
Work in harmony to achieve and adapt the means of the company’s objectives.
4. To Command
To trigger actions and act as a leader to ensure the work has been met.
5. To Control
To verify that the organization’s rule, given orders an...
... middle of paper ...
...y
Morgen Witzel and Malcom Warner http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585762.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199585762 Kazi Nashid Morsheda (n.d.), Fayolism, Fayol’s principles & Elements, http://www.academia.edu/4067269/Fayolism_Fayols_principle_and_elements Lauren Spatig, (2009), Rediscovering Fayol: Parallels to Behaviorists Management and Transformational Leadership, Fielding Graduate University http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/eds/detail?vid=3&sid=24eb909b-9b63-4a71-9c67-9e02000add69@sessionmgr115&hid=104&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ==#db=bth&AN=48177685 Lynch & Robert G., (January 2013), Fayol Publishes General and Industrial
Management, Salem Press Encyclopedia
Matthew Alanis, (2014), Fayol’s 14 Principles of Management
http://www.alanisbusinessacademy.com/2014/03/12/managementprinciples/
Henir Fayol a French industrialist defined management as consisting of five main activities, planning, organising, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Planning includes defining goals, establishing strategy, and developing plans to coordinate activities. Organising includes determining what tasks are to be done, who is to do them, how the tasks are to be grouped, who reports to whom, and where decisions are to be made. Commanding is telling people what should be done. Coordinating involves determining the timing and sequencing of activities so that they work together properly, allocating the appropriate proportions of resources, times and priority, and adapting means to ends. Controlling is the process of monitoring performance, comparing it with goals, and correcting and significant deviations.
Accordingly, one of his roles is to make all procedures and the required tasks simple as much as he can, so all followers at all and different levels can understand will what is required from them to accomplish it on time and in a professional way.
Carpenter, M., Bauer, T., Erodogan, B., & Short, J. (2013). Principles of management. (2nd ed.).
... succeed and will guide and build their followers to acceptable levels while striving to improve and achieve the highest quality of workers to maximize work productivity.
According to Kantooz and O’ Donnell, the principles of management are the fundamental truth of general validity, in which these truths are the guiding foundations in executing of the management functions and solution to problems that may arise (Gupta, 2009). Management, like every form of social science, has a developed set of principles, as management is also considered a type of social science, therefore has developed a number of principles of management. A famous French industrialist by the name of Henry Foyol, has introduced a set of 14 principles of management back in 1916 that is still widely considered by many authors (Gupta, 2009). This essay will look at comparing two companies which are based in Dubai, which are Virgin
Rodrigues, C. (2001), “Fayol’s 14 Principles of Management then and now: a framework for managing today’s organisations effectively”, Monclair State University, New Jersey.
This research has asked us to look into three different styles of management and find real life examples of companies or individuals who have or are currently using such styles of management. To begin we will take a look into the use of an autocratic style of management versus a participative. In this portion we will look into Leona Helmsley and her chain of hotels. Once this potion is completed, our next section will be looking into a centralized style of management versus a decentralized style. In this section of the research, we will be looking into Apple Inc and how they have built an empire with a centralized style of managing philosophy. Finally, in the final section of the research we will be taking a look at how Google has created an informal environment in which employees have direct access to executives and have the ability to share thoughts and ideas that are taken serious and to the heart.
Nowadays, management has become an important part of the society. The role of management is to assist the organisation to make the best use of its resource to achieve its goal. Base on the aim of management, one of the theorists Henri Fayol proposed the four necessary management functions: planning, organisation, leading, controlling are the tools managers use to achieve these goals. (Jones 2006) This essay is going to describe and discuss these functions.
The essential dimensions of classical management were based on a closed system view of organisation; that is, essential dimensions emphasised on a mechanical structure of control. So the essential dimensions of classical management break down to a set of four rigid and formal guidelines:
The evolution of management though the decades can be divided into two major sections. One of the sections is the classical approach. Under the classical approach efficiency and productivity became a critical concern of the managers at the turn of the 20th century. One of the approaches from the classical time period were systematic management which placed more emphasis on internal operations because managers were concerned with meeting the growth in demand brought on by the Industrial revolution. As a result managers became more concerned with physical things than towards the people therefore systematic management failed to lead to production efficiency. This became apparent to an engineer named Frederick Taylor who was the father of Scientific Management. Scientific Management was identified by four principles for which management should develop the best way to do a job, determine the optimum work pace, train people to do the job properly, and reward successful performance by using an incentive pay system. Scientifi...
However, some influential management authors believe that the classical management functions need to be update. Williams (2005, p. 7) updated the management functions and came out with four functions: making things happen; meeting the competition; organizing people, projects and process; and leading. To make things happen, it is essential to determine goals, planning ways to attain the goals, gathering and managing needed information to make superior decisions and also controlling performance to enable corrective action to take place if performance worsens. This function actually combined Fayol’s idea of planning and controlling. The thought of determining things to accomplish and developing plans to achieve goals is similar to function of planning suggested by Fayol, which is to define goals, establish strategy and develop plans to implement the strategy in order to reach the goals. Besides, Williams mentioned about controlling performance and corrective action, which is corresponding to Fayol’s classical management functions of controlling. Controlling, according to Fayol, involves observing organization performance and take action if necessary to ensure that goals are to be achieved. Nevertheless, the action of gathering and managing needed information to enable good decisions to be made is not stated in classical management functions. Based on the updated functions, organizing people, projects and processes included consideration of people issues and work processes. At the same time, Fayol mentioned organizing, which is the management process of determining best way to arrange organization’s resources and activities. They actually have the same meaning where both are about locating organization’s resources, which are the employees and also the work processes or activities. The Learning Company, a company that develops and markets games and software, was purchased by toy company Mattel. It was experiencing loss after three years of the purchase because each department in the company works independently and do not share resources.
Over 50 years ago, English-speaking managers were directly introduced to Henry Fayol’s theory in management. His treatise, General and Industrial Management (1949), has had a great effect on managers and the practice of management around the world. However, 24 years after the English translation of Fayol, Henri Mintzberg in the Nature of Managerial Work (1973) developed another theory and stated that Fayol’s work was just “folklores”.
may act as arbitrator or mediator. Lastly, if the leader’s management style causes conflict, then
There are three well-established theories of classical management: Taylor?s Theory of Scientific Management, Fayol?s Administrative Theory, Weber?s Theory of Bureaucracy. Although these schools, or theories, developed historical sequence, later ideas have not replaced earlier ones. Instead, each new school has tended to complement or coexist with previous ones.
Sociologist Max Weber undertook the first study of bureaucracy in the early 1900s (Tomkins, 2005). Weber’s theory of bureaucracy holds that administrative rationality is achieved by dividing work into specialized administrative functions, assigning each function to a specific office, placing clear limits on each office’s scope of authority, organizing officials on a career basis, and requiring them to carry out directives with strict discipline and in accordance with clearly defined rules (Tomkins, 2005). According to Weber, today’s government is predicated on the theory of legal-rational authority and its corresponding administrative apparatus – bureaucratic (Tomkins, 2005). Bureaucratic Administration is defined by a set of strictly defined rules that delineate the hierarchy of authority, the rights and duties of every official, and the means by which administrative duties are carried out (Tomkins, 2005). The ideal type bureaucracy, Weber envisioned, would include the following elements: fixed official duties, hierarchy of authority, system of rules, technical expertise, career service, written documentation and a spirit of informal impersonality (Tomkins, 2005). Henri Fayol was the first of the theorists to identify management as a continuing process of evolution and Gulick expanded on Fayol’s...