In this paper we will discuss how the Immunity to Change (ITC) and the Constructivism Developmental Theory (CDT) can be used in service of personal and spiritual evolution. We will look at an ITC map and the data generated by it and then reflect upon this information. To do this we start by introducing the terms of ITC and CDT and how we can make use of them to support our developmental growth. Furthermore, we are going to explore my personal ITC map and how working with it, through the lens of CDT, has led me to an adaptive change, to my personal growth and evolution.
Immunity to Change is one of CDT ‘s (Constructivism Developmental Theory) most powerful tools and it can be used by anyone, regardless of their interests, be them personal or professional. It helps in uncovering the hidden commitments and motivations that stop us from achieving our goals. It brings to light our Big Assumptions and enables us to hold them as Object rather than just be ran by them. Using the ITC map reveals to us not only what has been holding us back but also gives us a chance to come up with clear, objective goals and actions that can lead to a developmental, adaptive change rather than a technical one.
CDT studies the way we make and understand meaning or knowledge that either In-Forms us or Trans-Forms us. It looks at HOW we perceive and see the world around us lieu of the WHAT is being perceived. Constructivist part of CDT posits that “persons or human systems are constitutive of experience. We constitute reality, we don’t just copy reality” and that “every single moment of your life you choose what you pay attention to and what you disregard” (Kegan, 2014). The Developmental part supports the idea that we constantly change on all le...
... middle of paper ...
...d more comprehensive. This new vantage point is both more simple and more complex as it enables us to see both the forest and the trees, all in one glance.
I am now ready to pursue another goal, that of writing a book of questions that can help us to pierce through the veil of ignorance and help us climb up on the ladder of evolution, from one Order of Mind to the next.
References
Garvey-Berger, J. (1999). Key Concepts for Understanding the Work of Robert Kegan
(Kegan, Robert. (2014, February 12). Week 4: An Overview of Constructive-Development Theory (CDT): The Evolution of our Epistemologies [T1]. Psychology 1034. Lecture from Harvard Extension School, Cambridge, MA.
Kegan, R., & Laskow Lahey, L. (2009). Immunity to change. How to overcome it and unlock the potential in yourself and your organization. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Te first theory is Constructivism. Constructivism is known that human are meaning makers. We are not neutral with respect to the world. We actively interpret the world and make meaning of something. By interpreting images to mean something we compel and impose its meaningful use. As humans we look at three cause such a physical causes, psychological causes and spirtual cuases. The second thoery is on Development. While we evolve in mental complexity through out lives we have adaptive balances or stages of mental complexity. Starting at infacy to late adulthood. There are six order of conciousness which are zero to five. We will be discussing only he stages two through four. We make meaning different depending of which order of conciousness we are in. The two places of grow are slow or very slow. One will never move backwards. The last thoery is Holding Enviroment which consist of three components. The three components are confirmation,contradiction and continuty. Confirmation is described as holding on, support and encourgement. It appeals to our yearning for belonging. Contradiction is described as letting go, challenege and setting limits. It appeals to our yearning for agency,acheivement and autonomy. Continuty is described as staying out, remaining in place and being there. It appeals to our need for stability and predictability. '' A healthy holding enviroemnt provides an ingenious blen of support and challene and attends to the relationship between a persons mental capacity and the demands placed upon her by the cultural curriculum '' (Kegan;
For many, change is a cause for ignorance. Most of us fear the idea of change. When one is faced to deal with c...
Theories abound around how people develop emotionally, intellectually, socially and spiritually. This essay will examine the theories of five leaders on the subject of development.
This theory states that we are influenced by our parents but not determined by our early childhood developments or instincts. Most people live with limited self-reflection, they avoid core issues related to humanness and meaninglessness, facing our core issues head on leads to anxiety and dread, not facing our core life issues head on leads to a neurotic existence. It is better to face our core issues, aloneness, death, and living meaningfully, even if there is a price to pay with such awareness. Changing ones way of living requires focused self-discipline. When treating an issue the person has, you have to consider the whole person and how that issues might have contributed to all parts of their
Nevid, J.S. & Rathus, S. A. (2013). Psychology and the Challenges of Life: Adjustments and Growth. (12 ed.) Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons Inc.
Watching a young child grow from infancy to toddler hood, we marvel at the amount of learning that has allowed her to understand her expanding environment. Those early years provide the basis for language, physical dexterity, social understanding, and emotional development that she will use for the rest of her life. All of this knowledge is acquired before she even sets foot in school! This child has taught herself by gathering information and experiencing the world around her. This is an example of constructivism. Constructivism emphasizes the importance of the knowledge, beliefs, and skills an individual brings to the experience of learning. It recognizes the construction of new understanding as a combination of prior learning, new information, and readiness to learn. Individuals make choices about what new ideas to accept and how to fit then into their established views of the world (Brooks & Brooks, 1995).
Kegan, R. & L. Laskow Lahey. (2009). Immunity to Change: How to overcome it and unlock potential in yourself and your organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Part three of the textbook “Immunity to Change” has four chapters. The first chapter in part three is chapter eight and it explains unlocking potential as it relates to overcoming immunities. The authors state that there are three ingredients necessary in unlocking a person’s immunity to change. The first ingredient is the gut: the need, desire or visceral feelings that drive a person’s motivation which is why the ingredient is called gut. In other words, this is the ingredient that reveals if a person has the stomach to endure what they imagine will be the motivation or unpleasantness of the change being sought. The second ingredient is head and heart because this ingredient simultaneously engages thinking and feeling. The immunity to
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (June 2010). Managing organizational change: A philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management 10(2), 135–154.
“It is not the strongest of the species survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is most adaptable to change.” – Charles Darwin
The way a child develops through out their lives has been a crucial topic, a topic where many theorist state that children develop internally (born with it or on their own) or externally (with the help of others). The scope of a child developing successfully, for those who believe in internal development, consists of completing or experiencing each of the stages the theorists such as Piaget’s stages of intellectual development, Freud’s stages of psychosexual development or the eight stages of life that Erickson constructed. Theorists such as Vygotsky, Bandura, Skinner, and Brofrenbrenner, who believe in external development, stated that a child development consists of exterior influences such as parent, friends, the society or our environment. Regardless
Throughout my live, my behavior towards change has evolved into a more mature acceptance of the inevitable. As an adolescent, I failed to contemplate the reasoning behind changes that occurred within my life. I neglected to seek the deeper meaning of why modifications were being implemented. However, as an adult, I consider the rationale and possible outcome of the change taking place. I have grown to realize that the success of each individual situation depends on the attitude it is approached it with (Blais & Hayes, 2011).
There are many theories that help explain the journey of human development. Theorists, such as Sigmund Freud, Erik Erikson, Jean Piaget, and Lawrence Kohlberg, are among the most renowned theorists in identifying the different stages of human development from a cognitive, social, and emotional perspective. This paper is aimed at the works of Erik Erikson’s view on human development. Erikson’s psychosocial theory emphasized the impact of society and culture in an individual’s development. His psychosocial theory encompasses eight distinct stages of development (Matthews, In Class Discussion, September 2, 2015). He believed that individuals must find their own sense of regulation as a result of the interplay urges of the individual, and the nature of social influences. At each stage, individuals learn to handle new instincts and ways of understanding the self as well as others, to create a balanced sense of self-regulation (Batra, 2013).
Toribio, C. T., & Hernandez, R. G. (2011). Coping with resistance to change in organizations (Unpublished masters thesis). Linnaeus University, Sweden. Retrieved from http://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:425506
Inner change for outer development is the main concern of this dissertation. First, the assessment of our own values must be taken into consideration. Let us reflect on what we want we did. Either on the school, offices, or even on the streets, let us contemplate what we have done. Did we do the right thing? If this query answers our trivial minds as no, then it’s time to change our ways. Change can either be on the lighter side: it can bring a rather exuding feeling of calmness and peace inside ourselves. Or, on the other hand, on the dark side of it: changing to become more egocentric and excluding yourself into the world. If we change, we must then aim for the better and not choose the latter. What is then the value of change if the results don’t give a positive outcome; a waste.