In his book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant theorizes an absolute and universal guide based on the principle of reason to determine what humans morally ought to do— the categorical imperative. The categorical imperatives consists of different formulations, which simply act as different ways of defining it. Within his formulations, Kant stresses the importance of universalism, equality, and
Categorical Imperatives versus Hypothetical Imperatives
Before delving into the different formulations of the categorical imperative, Kant must distinguish between categorical imperatives and hypothetical imperatives. Kant first defines an imperative as a command of reason. He also adds that imperatives are expressed through ‘ought,’ which suggests a relationship between reason and will. Kant finally connects the ideas of reason and will though the differentiation of hypothetical and categorical,
Now all imperatives command either hypothetically or categorically. The former represent the practical necessity of a possible action as a means to attain something else which one wills (or which it is possible that one might will). The categorical imperative would be that one which represented an action as objectively necessary for itself, without any reference to another end (31/266).
On one hand, hypothetical imperatives command a certain as necessary for some particular purpose or goal you will. Hypothetical imperatives are conditional to desires: “If you do not want to go to prison, then do rob a bank.” Since hypothetical imperatives are associated with a desired end result, they are only applicable to people who to achieve that particular end result. ...
... middle of paper ...
...sts that a person can be treated as a means if they are involved voluntarily. Next, Kant supports his argument by demonstrating how the four previous examples are still consistent with this formulation. First, when a person commits suicide, their own life becomes a means to escape their situation. Secondly, if a borrower fails to repay the lender, then the lender becomes a mere means for the borrower’s financial gain. Third, if we see humanity as an end in itself, then we must cultivate our talents to pursue humanity’s full potential. The last example is similar to the third in that if humanity is an ends, then we must cooperate and assist others to achieve collective happiness. These four examples highlight that when we fail to perceive others as means instead of ends, we violate the first formulation by advancing standards that we would not want as a universal law.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Melissa Stachowiak Good Life Take-home #2 Professor Gan November 20, 2015 5.) What is the difference between a hypothetical and a categorical imperative. In class when we had the conversation about chapter two of Immanuel Kant’s Grounding of Morals, we had discussed the imperatives. The imperatives are broken down into two sections, hypothetical imperative and categorical imperative each having different meanings. Hypothetical imperative is described as a “command that a particular action is necessary as a means to some purpose, such as the attainment of personal happiness” (Kant).... [tags: Categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant]
1389 words (4 pages)
- ... Another Philosopher Micael Lacewing objects to this interpretation stating “any action could be justified if stated correctly,” (Kantian ethics: objections). For example, he says he could steal gifts from large shops when there are only seven letters in my name”. Due to a rare case such as this, he argues this law could apply to everyone.” Due to strict nature of this formulation, Lacewing’s argument is entirely credible depict how absurd the argument is. Kant may have expected criticism due to the severe nature as he formulated a more liberal interpretation of the Categorical imperative in which addresses many problems individuals may have adhered to Kant’s personal belief of the theory... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Philosophy, Ayn Rand, Kantianism]
1257 words (3.6 pages)
- The two ethical theories I have chosen to assess the situation at hand are Deontological Ethics 's Categorical Imperative and Act Utalitarianism. The situation up for discussion is whether or not the parents (Sydney and Jack) were right in convincing Olive to donate her kidney, to her younger sister Nancy who is in need because she suffers from end-stage renal failure. Deontological ethics would have us look at the situation based on the best efforts for the future. Based on the procedure of three formulations (tests) that help us make moral decisions.... [tags: Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative]
839 words (2.4 pages)
- Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason (Pojman and Vaughn 239). According to Kant, there is one good thing that comes without qualification – a good will. Any other act done as only being good with qualification, and only a good will is worthy of happiness. A good will is done because it is one’s duty, not someone just doing a duty. The expected consequences of an act of good will are morally neutral, and therefore irrelevant to moral discussion.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Categorical imperative]
1168 words (3.3 pages)
- ... Kant believed that people should only follow rules that are and can be followed universally. Conformity is essential in Kant’s theory, if society accept something as a norm, then it should be followed by everyone. Furthermore, Kant didn’t believe people should simply do something because it was the right thing to do, or do something because they wanted to. Kant believed that if it was a matter of want or even obligation, that people would then opt out of doing the right thing because they didn’t want to or they didn’t feel morally obligated to.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Ethics, Human]
981 words (2.8 pages)
- Kant's Categorical Imperative Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willing, i.e., it is good of itself”.... [tags: Philosophy Categorical Imperative Kant Essays]
1532 words (4.4 pages)
- Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals explores themes of morality and its application to rational beings. Rationality, to Kant, includes a necessary commitment to morality, wherein failing to be moral is simultaneously a failure to be rational. Within this work, Kant proposes a concept that he entitles the “Categorical Imperative”. The Categorical Imperative is essential in the exploration of morality in the rational being, and, as with morality, is dependent solely on reason alone.... [tags: Categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant, Morality]
1796 words (5.1 pages)
- Immanuel Kant, like his predecessors John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, believed morality was based on standards of rationality. His influential work, The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, argues for the existence of a “foundational principle of a metaphysics of morals”. 1 Such a principle, he asserts, must account for three propositions of morality: only actions done from duty have genuine moral worth, moral value arises from the maxim its action involves, not from the purpose that is to be achieved through it, and that a duty is an obligation to act in a specific manner out of respect for the law.2 Kant names this foundational principle the categorical imperative.... [tags: Morality, Categorical Imperative]
1083 words (3.1 pages)
- “Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the oftener and more steadily we reflect on them: the starry heavens above and the moral law within.” said Immanuel Kant. Morality is referred to as a societal code of conduct put forward by rational persons given the specified conditions. Throughout time, the concept of what morality is has played a crucial role in the study of ethics. Considered as the most influential thinker of the enlightenment era and one of the greatest western philosophers, German philosopher Immanuel Kant profoundly impacted the study of ethics.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Deontological ethics]
1001 words (2.9 pages)
- Can suicide be justified as morally correct. This is one of the many questions Immanuel Kant answers in, “The Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals”. Kant discusses many questions with arguable answers, which explains why he is one of the most controversial philosophers still today. Throughout Kant’s work, multiple ideas are considered, but the Categorical Imperative is one of the most prevalent. Though this concept is extremely dense, the Categorical Imperative is the law of freedom that grounds pure ethics of the metaphysics of ethics.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical Imperative, morality]
1055 words (3 pages)
- The Trials And Tribulations That The Slave Women During The South Were Faced With
- Toxic Chemicals Behind Personal Care And Beauty Products
- Should Animals Be Used For Research?
- The Harlem Renaissance : An Artistic, Intellectual, Musical, And Literary Movement
- The Great Depression
- Should Gun Control Laws Be Enacted?