According to Immanuel Kant, people’s morals are categorical imperative. This means that our actions are conscious driven and that our intentions are bounded in rationality to fulfill one’s duty. For Kant, morality should be necessary and universal (Kant, 2005: 49) He provides that actions must be universal and be based on a set of moral rules in order for them to be classified as moral or immoral. Reason is a main component of Kant’s argument of morality. Kant’s view of morality is premised on the notion of “good will,” which ultimately ensures that an act compl...
... middle of paper ...
...Kant’s Categorical Imperative holds the view that morality should be examined on a rationale level and that its moral value can be determined based on the universality of the act. In contrast, Mill’s Utilitarianism believes that the moral value of an act should be established on the basis of whether the action provided utility for the greater number of people. Mill considers the consequences of an action while Kant is also concerned about the motive or intent behind an action or decision. After examining both Kant and Mill’s arguments, it can be said that they both have great views on morality; regardless of having different opinions. Morality is imperative to both Kant and Mill. They both seek to understand morality and the role of ethics in society. The fact that they disagree on some things but agree on others is what makes their views on morality significant.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In Elements of Pure Practical Reason Book, I, Immanuel Kant, a prominent late Enlightenment Era German philosopher discusses his most famous ethical theory, the “Categorical Imperative.” The “Categorical Imperative” is a proposed universal law in stating all humans are forbidden from certain actions regardless of consequences. Although this is the general definition of this ethical theory, the Categorical Imperative” exists in two above formulations, A strict interpretation of Categorical Imperative and a more liberal interpretation.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Philosophy, Ayn Rand, Kantianism]
1257 words (3.6 pages)
- Immanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism are two schools of thought that view morality differently. Both Kant and Mill understand and agree that some form of morality exists. They both recognize that the concept of morality applies to all rational beings and that an action can be deemed as moral or immoral based on reason. Despite being reasonably in agreement about what morality is; there are numerous important differences between Mill and Kant’s perception of morality.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Utilitarianism]
1759 words (5 pages)
- Google defines Categorical Imperative as “(in Kantian ethics) an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person 's inclination or purpose.” (Google) Thus, there is no middle ground on morals nor is there ever a situation to where one should commit a moral wrong doing. Immanuel Kant had strong views regarding Categorical Imperative and believed that universal law applies to all. He also believes there cannot be any exceptions to this rule, or it becomes right for all to live by the exception.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Ethics, Human]
981 words (2.8 pages)
- Melissa Stachowiak Good Life Take-home #2 Professor Gan November 20, 2015 5.) What is the difference between a hypothetical and a categorical imperative. In class when we had the conversation about chapter two of Immanuel Kant’s Grounding of Morals, we had discussed the imperatives. The imperatives are broken down into two sections, hypothetical imperative and categorical imperative each having different meanings. Hypothetical imperative is described as a “command that a particular action is necessary as a means to some purpose, such as the attainment of personal happiness” (Kant).... [tags: Categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant]
1389 words (4 pages)
- Immanuel Kant was known as a German philosopher in the 18th century. During this time, he came up with the concept of categorical imperative; this concept is described as a moral law that applies to individuals and how they make decisions and approach situations. Kant’s concept is separate from personal motives or desires, it is an obligation that an individual will do something for their themselves and not what may come out of it in the future. In the book “Grounding for Metaphysics and Morals” Kant states, “A rational being must always regard himself as a legislator in a kingdom of ends rendered possible by the freedom of the will whether as member or as sovereign.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Categorical imperative]
1221 words (3.5 pages)
- Moral decision-making constitutes an important part of the everyday human life. In this paper, I will examine and contrast Utilitarianism and Kant’s theory of the Categorical Imperative, both, which provide people with a moral structure, and how the issue of etiquettes relates to Kantian Theory. It is important to note that both the theories have their advantages and drawbacks, thus to enable one to make a methodical decision, it is important to understand the basic principles of each. However, in this paper there will be a main focus on Kantian Categorical argument and then discussing the issue of etiquettes.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative, Morality]
1620 words (4.6 pages)
- Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason (Pojman and Vaughn 239). According to Kant, there is one good thing that comes without qualification – a good will. Any other act done as only being good with qualification, and only a good will is worthy of happiness. A good will is done because it is one’s duty, not someone just doing a duty. The expected consequences of an act of good will are morally neutral, and therefore irrelevant to moral discussion.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Categorical imperative]
1168 words (3.3 pages)
- The Categorical Imperative Of Immanuel Kant’s Philosophy What would you do if you saw a little old lady with a cane walking slowly across a busy street without remembering to look both ways. Most people would answer that they would run out into the street to save her. However, why would these people do this. The rescuer may have not had any relation whatsoever to the little old lady, yet they still decide to risk their life for her. Was it because of basic, natural instinct. Did the rescuer just instantly react to what he/she saw and just let his reaction take over his body.... [tags: essays research papers]
1606 words (4.6 pages)
- Maggie Fitzgerald was raised knowing one thing; she was trash. She had no true family that cared for her. No one even really knew she existed. The only person who gave her hope was her father. That was true up until she found the sport boxing and met Frankie. She earned everything through blood, sweat, and tears. Even when people were telling her she couldn’t do it, she still tried. Through all of this Maggie gained freedom, personhood, and experience. Freedom according to Immanuel Kant is the ability to guide ones actions using laws of one’s own making.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative]
773 words (2.2 pages)
- Categorical Imperative is a philosophical theory was developed by Kant in 1785. If someone does not know what is categorical imperative means, the term imperative in my own words means that you should do something. If you put the the two terms together, categorical imperative means that an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person 's purpose.Basically, The Categorical Imperative is something that one should do, but not because it will benefit you in this way.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Ethics, Categorical imperative]
1316 words (3.8 pages)