Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
IBM diverse workforce case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: IBM diverse workforce case study
IBM has been a global leader in taking the initiative to bring about change. Structured by firm public policy, they have been recognized for their achievements in going above and beyond, while dragging those expectations on to their suppliers as well as internal departments. With IBM’s four major points of public policy being environmental, supply chain, employee well-being and political issues, they have carved the way to being one of the largest and most successful companies in the world. The larger a company becomes, the larger their global footprint. IBM recognized that they were susceptible to devastating the environment with both their manufacturing and services. In order to become environmentally sustainable and remain an environmental leader, they developed the Global Environmental Management System in 1971 which identified impact projections. Some of the major sources that attributed to environmental impact were the use of chemicals and water-intensive processes. IBM focused on a means to more efficiently manage these processes, from storage, use and disposal. Furthermore, they went on to create more eco-friendly products that could be recycled. The EMS policy focuses on employee well-being as well as resource conservation and creating products that have less of an impact on the environment. These responsibilities and expectations are seen on a company wide spectrum, where IBM employees have a commitment to environmental leadership. Training is provided to all employees, who are consistently being updated and certifying their compliance with IBM’s expectations. This corporate responsibility isn’t unrecognized. IBM was recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This came at the cost of their ambitious emis... ... middle of paper ... ...Like to Work at IBM. Retrieved November 20, 2013, from http://http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2011/03/20/what-its-like-to-work-at-ibm/ • Fortune/CNN Money (2012, May 21). Fortune 500 Biggest Companies. Retrieved November 19, 2013, from http://http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2012/performers/companies/biggest/ • http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/bus/pdf/qr_gbe3172-usen_blueprintsc.pdf • IBM (2013). IBM - Diversity 3.0™. Retrieved November 19, 2013, from http://www-03.ibm.com/employment/us/diverse/awards.shtml • IBM (2013). Responsibility at IBM. Retrieved November 19, 2013, from http://http://www.ibm.com/ibm/responsibility/ • Lawrence, Weber, & Post (2013). Business and Society (14th ed.). U.S.A.: McGraw-Hill. • LeClaire, Jennifer. "IBM Wins 'Green' Cloud Patent for More Efficient Data Centers." Sci-Tech Today. N.p., 12 Nov. 2013. Web. 2 Dec. 2013.
Supplying eco-friendly products has been on the Walmart agenda since the early 1990s. After a failed first attempt and much criticism, the company decided to try again. In a speech made in October of 2005, CEO of Walmart, H. Lee Scott Jr., declared Walmart would devise a “business sustainable strategy” to reduce the environmental impact the company had. Walmart could not pull this off alone. If they only focused on the confines of themselves, rather than all that they were involved with, it was estimated that they’d only reduce their impact by about 10%. To reach that goal of 100%, Walmart had to involve stakeholders to make networks which achieve sustainability. These networks proved to be vital in not only Walmart’s goal in minimizing its environmental impact, but recovering their reputation, avoiding criticism, saving money, raising awareness, improving customer satisfaction, and creating incentive for other businesses to work towards sustainability.
Fortune 100 Best Companies To Work For. (2014, February 3). Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work For . Retrieved April 18, 2014, from http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/best-companies/2014/snapshots/75.html?iid=BC14_lp_arrow1
With forward movement in society, it is important to consider not just what will propel most toward success, but also what will help to sustain the environment along the way. What may have been considered appropriate decades ago, may no longer be socially acceptable due to the changes observed in both the business world and the environment (Fiske, 2010). Therefore, it is important for organizations thriving in today?s economy to consider how they may capitalize most effectively from their product or service of choice while minimizing or eliminating any damages along the way (Knoke, 2012).
In relation to sustainability, more and more this aspect is becoming very important for a company’s bottom line and for them to differentiate themselves from their competition that fails to establish a sustainability program. In a macro sense, it ethically responsible to establish a sustainability program to identify ways that the firm can make a difference globally and reduce their overall expense and
In the end, IBM is very much like most large software companies. It does not have the employee satisfaction ratings of a young, hip start-up such as Google, but it's ratings are within the average range and have remained very consistent for decades. The pay, compensation and benefits that the company provides for its employees is on the higher side of average, but still within that range. The bureaucracy at IBM is also fairly average, following the same setup as most organizations.
Boeing is embedding environmental thoughts and actions in employees by learning from them and enabling them to drive change. This affects the Managements planning by, enforcing new rules of the busi...
Fortune Magazine. (n.d.). FORTUNE Most 'Accountable' Companies. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from Fortune Magazine Web Site: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2006/full_list/
By this introduction, the last years, the companies are orienting its actions to long-term operations improving their stability, employment, social welfare and standards for protection of the environment. One of the companies to develop this kind of strategy to work across its stakeholders is Apple Inc., the tech leading company who by the beginnings of the millennium was ranked by Greenpeace as one of the most contaminating and less concern about the environment among its pears in the tech industry and in the present years is working and developing a multi stage plan to develop a corporate image who represents the corporate
1, 2010). Incorporating sustainability into business goals and culture has become more than just the ethical thing to do, it can give a company a competitive advantage and increase their bottom line returns (Oppenheim & Stuchtey, 2015). Additionally, businesses that practice environmental ethics such as reducing emissions, efficient allocation of scarce resources, recycling, and reducing energy consumption benefit from increased trust and brand loyalty (Ewing-Chow & Soh, 2009). Some ethical activities, such as reduced energy consumption, have obvious benefits for a company because they reduce the cost of production. For a financial institution, electronic banking channels can decrease labor costs while electronic statements reduce cost of production. Both of these are environmentally beneficial as electronic banking channels allow customers to conduct business without driving to a brick-and-mortar branch and electronic statements reduce paper consumption. An added soft benefit is as customers enjoy the convenience of these services brand loyalty is expanded for the bank. Corporations that do not demonstrate environmental ethics may suffer adverse consequences. For example, a company that is caught illegally dumping toxic waste will not only face fines and potential criminal charges, but public fallout as consumers may boycott the company’s product to show such behavior will not be tolerated. For all these reasons, it is vital that companies address environmental concerns in their ethics
Microsoft perhaps could develop programs targeting uplifting society that is in need of basic human rights such as education, safety and environmental protection. This benefits the society in the long run by developing professionals to create more technological innovations. Microsoft could extend their current showroom concept to customers and communities with a possible incorporation of a division for instance to take up Corporate Social Responsibility issues. Make any law enforcement request open and engage 3rd party NGOs to make sure a rigorous review is followed and privacy is respected. Microsoft has been a leader in generating standards, but it is necessary to collaborate with other big corporations to make a single standard that is viable and adopted by all parties to defeat the social enemy.
In conclusion, going green in the workplace is catchy new trend. Choosing to go verdant can be a grueling task and one that is confronted with some unique pros and cons. Although making green choices come at a slightly higher price, the rewards that are earned more than cover these costs. When a company chooses wisely going green can not only help the environment, and reduce the carbon foot-print the company makes but it can also prove to be a very smart business decision that can be financially gratifying.
57). During recruitment, younger candidates are likely to show higher interest in a company with a successful sustainability program (SHRM, 2011, p. 33). Employers should seek those who seek to include environmental stewardship and social responsibility in their core values (Liebowitz, 2010, p. 52). Employers should also identify those individuals who are willing to work as team, adapt quickly to change, and inclined to take risk while finding creative solutions to problems. Success with new employees depends on early introduction of company sustainability goals; by including sustainability in the onboarding process, employees can relate the sustainability efforts to their job
Stuart Hart, in a business article, discusses the tough task for companies to make a sustainable global ec...
The environment is a shared responsibility among members of society: business entities, people and government. In recent years, it is becoming common to associate entities with apprehensions regarding water, air and soil pollution, hence, business entities play a vital role in the conservation of natural resources. As suggested by Eze et al., multinational companies can massively contribute in the promotion of the environment through innovations and improvements not only on the entity’s products but also in its methods. Stakeholders are influenced greatly by the environmental and social standing of an entity. So, they require that business entities provide products that are cheap and of good quality without leaving any harmful traces to the