In the first essay my writing was unpolished; still with aspects of the conformity I had been accustomed too in high school, the goal of which was to write an essay like that of someone else, someone who has scored a 9 on their AP essay. In this stage, there is very little opinion outright placed into the essay. The first essay brought me from the comfort of high school AP writing classes into the college spectrum, with the essays final predict being a more well refined piece, rather than that of an AP timed essay. In the first essay I used my sources, the Gettysburg Address and a 19-century letter, only for credibility to the point I was trying to make, that of English being a language in which one word can me two or three different things depending on the context it is said in. The essay was in the style of moving from one point to the next, without any real thought being given to connecting them together, other than the sequencing of ideas. The second essay started along the path of being more open to the audience through my writing. In the essay, as was the purpose of the essay, I analyses the essay on how the language we speak effects the way we process information. This can be understood as a further in-depth argument to that of the first essay, as it covers similar topics, yet the analyzed essay allowed me to use i...
... middle of paper ...
...I stated this in the beginning. However, this may be caused by what style of essay each one was, and so happened that as the semester progressed I was asked to give more personal refection into the essay. But, I feel that I am adding more openness to my essays, and in doing so making them flow more elegantly then the first essay. In regards to how I will use this in the future, I am taking English 112 next semester. Moreover, the skills acquired in this course will help me write better essays on my History tests and in other humanities courses I will take at Tech. Going past the next four years of my life, in my career I will need to wrote proposals, final works, and research papers on my findings; all of which will need the skills incorporated in order to be seen and understood.
This has been a great year and I look forward to English 112 with you, next semester.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In many lives people face others with different ideas and beliefs. Sometimes these opinions cause complaints that turn into arguments, however, these are never settled or reach an understanding. Making a complaint is creating a strong position that proves the point and defends the issue using a logical argument. To begin with, many arguments come from a discussion between two people that intensify and become more heated. These arguments explore the difference of opinions to prove which is per-say right or wrong.... [tags: Critical thinking, Logic, Argument, Psychology]
724 words (2.1 pages)
- For many, the idea of existence as a predicate causes issues for the ontological argument. In the argument Anselm states that God is a being, than which nothing greater can be conceived, and using logic he comes to the conclusion that God must exist by definition. This can be seen as strength to the argument as if it is a valid deduction it proves God’s existence to an atheist as well as a believer. However, Kant counters this argument by saying that existence could not be a predicate of anything.... [tags: Ontology, Ontological argument, Existence]
1297 words (3.7 pages)
- Student #: 1001725779 TA: Michel S. Tutorial: 10am St. Anselm discovers the ontological argument and he presents an argument that supports Gods existence. In this essay, I will consider the main argument that Anselm states, and list explanations that results in the uncertainty of God’s existence. This essay will critique Anslems argument by using Gaunilo idea of the perfect island and include a priori and a posteriori to show the problematic areas of Anslems argument. We begin with the explanation of Anslems argument.... [tags: Existence, Ontology, Cosmological argument]
943 words (2.7 pages)
- One of the most important and commonly debated questions throughout history is whether a god exists. The answer to the question is one that is simple. Either a god exists or one does not exist. The existence of a god is a topic that philosophers have written about for ages, and will continue to write about. Two of the most well-known arguments for the existence of a god are; the Ontological Argument by St. Anselm and the Cosmological Argument by Thomas Aquinas. Each of the two arguments maintains a certain level of strength but nonetheless each has their weaknesses.... [tags: Ontology, Existence, Cosmological argument]
783 words (2.2 pages)
- In H. J. McCloskey’s On Being an Atheist article, he argues against two philological design arguments: the cosmological argument, and the teleological argument. He also discusses his views on theists’ faith, the existence of evil, and free will. McCloskey states in his article that theists’ views on atheists are wrong. This statement I found out was true after reading his entire article. My previous view was that atheists did not care about following rules or being moral. I also believed that they are bad people.... [tags: God, Theology, Teleological argument]
1813 words (5.2 pages)
- Paper Topic 3 For this paper I will break down the following argument in terms of validity and soundness: If an argument has a true conclusion, then it is both valid and sound. If an argument is sound, then it is valid. An argument will have a true conclusion if it is sound. An argument has a false conclusion only if it is valid. If an argument has a false conclusion, then it is invalid. An argument is both valid and invalid. Therefore, an argument is sound if and only if it is sound. I have prepared a dictionary to more clearly distinguish the different premises.... [tags: Logic, Argument, Validity, Soundness]
1064 words (3 pages)
- Exploring the Ontological Argument For nearly a thousand years, the ontological argument has captured the attention of philosophers. The ontological argument was revolutionary in its sequence from thought to reality. It was an argument that did not require any corresponding experiment in reality; it functioned without the necessity of empirical data. Despite flaws and problems found in some ontological arguments and the objections raised to those arguments, ontological arguments still provide a phenomenal vehicle for ontological discussion through St.... [tags: phylosophy, Anselm's argument]
1752 words (5 pages)
- The Argument for Celibacy How could someone explain America’s loosening view of sexual intercourse over recent decades. Have our moral standards changed so much that they now accept or even encourage frequent sex. Is it just a method of rebellion as people attempt to fight conservative societal views. Perhaps we just wish to fight those who instill inhibitive ideas on us, and our forms of freedom – in this case, that of our bodies. Has American media’s desire for revenue and profit caused an increased sway towards what was previously deemed inappropriate.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays]
2164 words (6.2 pages)
- 1) A synopsis of the argument crisis What are we going to do. It is a main topic of the chapter. The book shows us a few essays to relate to crisis. That is about the nature of crisis or college education or the relationship between two countries. They introduced to us why we have to use crisis for the argument, because it is one way to learn how to develop argument. When we get in the crisis situation, we can illustrate many different sides, and one of them will be most persuasive argument leads the direction of the argument.... [tags: Persuasion Argument]
988 words (2.8 pages)
- Mackie in his paper Evil and Omnipotence, constructs an argument against the idea of the possibility of a God existing that has the characteristics laid out by the main religions: Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. These characteristics include that God is omnipotent, or He is capable of stopping evil, and omni benevolent, or He wants to eliminate evil and He is entirely good. Mackie systematically goes through his logical thought process as well as his response to any type of criticism or alternative solution that might arise.... [tags: Atheism Religion Argument]
1968 words (5.6 pages)