First, the defending party must owe a duty of care to the other party. It is evident that our hunter has a family at his home in America to which the hunter must care and is ultimately responsible for. That being said, this establishes that there is a duty of care literally to his family or, to use business context, there is a duty to his client or even his partners. The hunter’s ambition and desire lead him to recklessly pursue an elephant which can be interpreted as a foreign desire to our hunter’s native home and interpret the elephant’s size as the hunter’s desire for large quantities since he completely walked passed a purple cow and trampled black orchids. The story mentions that the hunter is already the owner of many animals which for our purposes we can consider property or assets to his trade (Thurber 27). It is common place in the business world that rationale must be used when making decisions as opposed to emotion and desire in order to avoid being negligent.
Secondly the established duty of care must be breached by the defendants’ actions. During his quest the hunter "would trample black orchids" ...
... middle of paper ...
... left his board" (Thurber 27). Everything he owned was left in ruins. These damages were too extreme for even his family to bear.
Ultimately, we can factually conclude that the hunter is guilty of negligence. He owed a duty of care to himself and to his family. He breached this duty by pursuing wrongful actions. His actions were the direct and only cause for the damages, and lastly the damages sustained were recognizable. Therefore you should always be sure to maintain your duty of care to avoid the ripple effect that leads to negligence.
Miller, Roger LeRoy., and Gaylord A. Jentz. "Chapter 4 Torts and Cyber Torts." Business Law Today: The Essentials. Mason, OH: South-Western, 2013. 115-118. Print.
Thurber, James. "The Hunter and the Elephant." Fables for Our Time and Famous Poems Illustrated. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1997. 27. Print.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... Consequently, the action by Barney was intentional, by causing fear to Wilmer and caused reasonable fear that lead her to faint and banged her head causing bruising. Thereafter, being unconscious Barney locked Wilmer in a room to recover and went to look for her after thirty minutes. The Legal Dictionary.net define false imprisonment as “the unlawful confinement or restraint of a person without legal authority or justification.” In addition, they are elements of false imprisonment to be present to prove a legal claim.... [tags: Contract, Tort, Common law, Tort law]
887 words (2.5 pages)
- Issue To determine based on the case facts, if Alma can sue Norma for negligence based on tort law or not. Rule To establish negligence, it is imperative that three main conditions are to be satisfied. Firstly, it needs to be proved that the defendant had a duty to care directed towards the plaintiff. Secondly, there needs to be a breach of this duty due to the negligent conduct of the defendant. Thirdly, the plaintiff should have suffered harm due to the duty to care being breached by the defendant (Lindgren, 2011).... [tags: Negligence, Tort, Tort law, Duty of care]
1035 words (3 pages)
- Presented are four separate cases that have been argued and settled in a court of law. Each of these cases represent a different kind of tort, a tort is a civil wrong or wrongful act, which can be either intentional or accidental, from which injury occurs to another (Hill & Hill n.d.). The torts are as listed, intentional, criminal, negligence, and liability as presented in the four researched cases. State Rubbish Collectors Ass’n v. Siliznoff When a person violates another person’s legal rights deliberately it is considered an intentional tort (Mayer et al.... [tags: Tort Law Cases]
1554 words (4.4 pages)
- In tort law there is negligence and within this there is the duty of care element, which helps to decide if compensation should be emplaced. The concept of negligence is a difficult one and has been broken into three separate parts: · Duty of care owed by the defendant to the claimant · Breach of that duty of care · Damage caused to the claimant as a result of the defendant's breach in duty of care. All three parts have to be present before negligence can be proved. One requirement for proving the tort of negligence is that a duty of care exists between the claimant and the defendant.... [tags: Tort Law]
957 words (2.7 pages)
- ... Therefore, Subsurface Wizard Inc., another soil expert firm, was called in to investigate the situation. They ultimately concluded that Acme Underground’s employee did not fully test the sub-surface conditions and a revised design which costed the Municipality an extra 350 thousand dollars was drafted . In the case study, Acme Underground Ltd. is the sole tortfeasor as their action satisfies the elements of a tortious act. In fact, they may be held potentially liable for both vicarious liability and economic loss.... [tags: Tort, Tort law, Negligence, Common law]
1070 words (3.1 pages)
- Tort law is a very prevalent aspect of conducting business and daily life in the twenty first century. According to the textbook, The Legal Environment of Business, tort law provides “remedies for the invasion of various protected interests.” (Cross & Miller, 2012) In this essay about tort law, I will talk about a tort case that has personally impacted me. To do so, I will provide a background of the event, apply facts of the case to applicable law, summarize lessons of the week as they relate to this case and provide a plausible argument for the parties involved.... [tags: Law]
938 words (2.7 pages)
- Introduction: Tort is defined as conditions where the illegal conduct of one party causes harm to another party. For example, party A had to face loss due to unethical or wrongful deeds of party B. Tort can be either negligent that is unintentional or intentional. Some examples of intentional torts include fraud, defamation, offense, insult, assault or interference among others. For example, during a business meeting, an employer suffers from reputation loss or insult due to the wrong deeds of another employer, with whom he had a clash before.... [tags: Tort law, Tort, Negligence, Law]
1254 words (3.6 pages)
- The Absence of the Concept of Transferred Malice in Irish Tort Law Introduction The title of this assignment, which i propose that i shall be revisiting for the purposes of this tort project is that: “the concept of transferred malice is not accepted in Irish tort law” In dealing with this topic I will inevitably be looking at what a battery is, what is transferred malice, cases in other jurisdictions which have accepted the concept of transferred malice in tort law, transferred malice in crime and why it is accepted in criminal law, and finally my arguments as to why I believe it should be adopted into our jurisdiction.... [tags: Tort Law]
1887 words (5.4 pages)
- “The categories of negligence are never closed”. [Lord Macmillan in Donoghue v. Stevenson- (1932)] The tort of negligence is a relatively recent phenomenon, which has come to become the most dynamic and rapidly changing areas of liability in modern law. Lord Macmillan’s assertion that “ the categories of negligence are never closed” suggests how courts possess the power to expand the area of liability by bringing in new duty situations as a result of new set of facts coming is everyday.... [tags: Tort Law]
876 words (2.5 pages)
- A number of aspects of liability rise from this case study and each one will be discussed. With regards to the headaches suffered by Karl, it is necessary to look at private nuisance. Negligence is disregarded as it is assumed from the details in the case study that the headaches suffered are not so serious as to cause personal injury, it is just described as ‘mere discomfort’. Such a claim under the law of nuisance requires three factors to be fulfilled. The first being a continuous interference.... [tags: Tort Law]
1310 words (3.7 pages)