Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Physical attractiveness discuss text
Literature review on physical attractiveness and romantic relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Physical attractiveness discuss text
The current research explores how women are physically attracted to muscular males. The overarching thesis is that women who are only physically attracted to their partner are not looking for a long-lasting relationship or commitment. In the first section of the paper, I will discuss background research on physical attractiveness and sexual desire and distinguish the difference between long-term and short-term relationships. Then, I will discuss the innovation of the current hypothesis. Then, I will briefly discuss the proposed conceptual methods to ideally test this hypothesis. Finally, I will discuss implications and conclusions.
Physical attractiveness is generally defined as the degree to which a person's physical traits are considered aesthetically pleasing or beautiful. The term often implies sexual attractiveness and desirability, but can also be distinct from the two. There are many factors which influence one person's attraction to another, with physical aspects being one of them.
Commonly, physical attractiveness is an important factor promoting sexual attraction and initial interpersonal attraction (Swami& Furnham, 2008a). Both men and women highly value a likely partner’s physical attractiveness (Buss, 1989; Feingold, 1990; Swami, 2007). Many studies also have demonstrated physical attractiveness to be an important characteristic once a relationship has begun.
Physical attraction itself includes universal perceptions common to all human cultures, as well as aspects that are culturally and socially dependent, along with individual subjective preferences. Previous research has shown that overall attractiveness is associated with one's physical appearance. There are not many researchers that would...
... middle of paper ...
...Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (September 01, 2000). Female coital orgasm and male attractiveness. Human Nature, 11, 3, 299-306.
Geary, D. C., Vigil, J., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2004). Evolution of human mate choice. The
Journal of Sex Research, 41, 27–42.
Feng, Charles (2002-12-06). "Looking Good: The Psychology and Biology of Beauty". Stanford University.
Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI (January 2000). "Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence". Evol Hum Behav 21 (1): 39–48.
Guy Dammann (20 August 2008). "Rules of attraction". The Guardian. "Scientists from Brunel University have revealed that physical attraction is all down to bodily symmetry.
Murray, S., & Milhausen, R. (January 01, 2012). Factors impacting women's sexual desire: Examining long-term relationships in emerging adulthood. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 21, 2, 101-115.
know beauty in any form”(86). We are so conditioned to see female beauty as what men
There is a famous saying that states, “ we should not judge a book by its cover”, but oftentimes the first thing noticed on a person is their looks. One’s “physical beauty” strongly influences people’s first impressions of them. As a whole, we tend to assume that pretty people are more likeable and better people than those who are unattractive. Around the world, we believe that what is beautiful is good. There is a general consensus within a culture about what is considered physically appealing and beautiful. “Physical beauty” is associated with being more sociable, intelligent, and even socially skilled. Society shares this common notion of who has and who does not have “physical beauty”. Thus, “physical beauty”, as seen
In the article the researchers were trying to challenge the sexual strategies theory. It seems as though sexual strategies theory is different genders having different preferences when choosing a mate, in the case of long and short term relationships. The hypothesis at first was that both boys and girls felt that attractiveness was important. Girls would be more inclined to date someone because of social status and that boys would be the complete opposite. They also expected that social status would only become important when the person is attractive and social status would be important no matter if the person is attractive on no for girls. The last thing that was tested was according to Ha (2009) “the potential moderator effects of self-perceived mate value on adolescents desire to date with an attractive person.” Also according to Ha (2009) “They hypothesized that boys and girls preference for attractiveness and high social status would be independent of their own perceived mate value.” The information used to come to result of the theory has been known to be collect using surveys ...
What is beauty? How do human beings decide who is attractive and who is not? Society is full of messages telling us what is beautiful, but what are those definitions based on? Do we consciously decide whom we are attracted to, or is biology somehow involved? The issue of beauty and how we define it has been studied for centuries. Scholars from all fields of study have searched for the "formula" for beauty. Darwin in his book The Descent of Man wrote, "It is certainly not true that there is in the mind of man any universal standard of beauty with respect to the human body. It is however, possible that certain tastes in the course of time become inherited, though I have no evidence in favor of this belief." (1) Science has tried to look at beauty beyond the conscious level. It has tried to determine what roles biology plays in human attraction. Scientists have discovered that symmetry and scent play a role in defining human attraction. (3) But while this can begin to explain beauty on the most basic of levels, what accounts for variations in the standard of beauty? The idea of beauty varies within different societies and communities. Do these cultural preferences have a biological basis? What is the relationship between biology and society in relation to the idea of beauty? How do they relate to each other, and how do they differ? In particular what role does science play in the preference that many societies, (in particular South Asian, East Asian, and North American Cultures), have for fairer skin?
A psychological mechanism is defined as an adaptation of human behavior that evolved due to evolutionary pressures. This paper focuses on the psychological mechanism of human mating strategies and the evolution of mate preferences. There are several theories to explain how differences in male and female mating strategies developed. This paper explores the parental investment theory, male mating effort as well as the role of different adaptive problems faced by males and females. The traits that humans find attractive in a partner are the ones that confer a reproductive advantage to the individual (Buss, 1994). Early in the literature there is evidence to support the theory that males and females differ in their mate preferences in such a way that males are unselective while females are choosy (Darwin 1871). However, there are also similarities in what each sex finds attractive. It is important to look at how these mating strategies evolved and why adaptive mate preferences continue to exist.
How a person perceives their body is influenced by what it looks like to them and what it looks like to others. Our society teaches us through media and social pressure that body image is important. Feeling attractive is an important part of self worth and for many, feeling attractive means matching a certain ideal appearance. Most of us will never be able to look like this ideal, but the message we get is that we risk social failure if we do not try hard enough. When we believe this message we may feel incompetent and depressed and have low self-esteem because we cant meet impossible standards of appearance.
Through competition men demonstrate dominance through various ornamental displays. Women, however, compete through signals showing reproductive prowess for genetically fit and reliable (investment for child rearing) mates. Inter-sexual selection further influences sexual influences regarding choosing a mate. Humans desire those who show masculinity, an hourglass figure, and symmetrical facial characteristics. These traits influence who we pick for a mates, possibly more so than other attributes such as: humor and
The beauty halo effect has become a strong phenomenon in social psychology nowadays. The beauty halo effect can also be called “the physical attractiveness” stereotype and the “what is beautiful is good” principle (Lewis-Beck, Bryman and Liao, 2004). The halo effect makes reference to the tendency of people to better rate attractive people for their personality traits than the individuals that are qualified less attractive (Lewis-Beck, Bryman and Liao, 2004). The psychologist Edward Thorndike first wrote about the halo effect phenomenon in his paper The Constant Error in Psychological Ratings in 1920. He noticed in his work that “ratings were apparently affected by the tendency to think of a person in general as rather good or rather inferior and to color the judgments of the qualities by this general feelings” (Lachman and Bass, 2001). The halo effects explain the fact that early aspects influence the interpretation of later aspects (Forgas, 2011). Since the first definition of the halo effects made by Thorndike in 1920, this concept has been the subject...
This was the study Elaine Hatfield did at the University of Minnesota. For this study, she used 752 incoming freshman and had them meet at a welcome dance. Beforehand, her and her co-workers gave them aptitude and personality tests but assigned them together at random. After the couples talked for two and a half hours, the only factor that contributed to them liking each other was the physical attractiveness of their partner. The result was that "Self-esteem, intelligence, and personality did not affect liking for the dates or subsequent attempts to date them."(Hatfield) This research shows the power that physical attractiveness has on who we are attracted to and who our potential partners
Previous research has reported several gender differences between men and women regarding the desire for sex. According to Randy J. Larson and David M. Buss's book Personality Psychology: Domains of Knowledge About Human Nature, men view pornography more often than women (d=.63). Men also desire more sexual partners, have more frequent sexual partners, and are more willing to accept offers of sex from a stranger (Hald & Hogh-Olesen, 2010). Evolutionarily, sex differences have relied on parental investment and sexual selection theory. The sex that invests less in offspring is less discriminatory in their selection of a mate. Because women have more of an obligatory role in parental investment, they place greater importance on mate selection whereas men place a greater value on a woman’s physical appearance. Although men score higher in ratings pertaining to the desire for sex, women score higher in emotional investment. Women tend to score higher on items such as passionate, cuddlesome, affectionate, and romantic (Larson & Buss 2014).
Peters, Sandy, and Thomas Peters. "How Important are Good Looks?" TOPICS Online Magazine. Mar. 2001. 13 Nov. 2001. http://www.rice.edu/projects/topics/Electronic/Magazilie.html.
It is only in recent years that physical attractiveness was looked upon from a scientific point of view and not simply a poetic or philosophical pondering. We now know that we have a predisposition to see physical attraction as the primary factor of romantic attraction. When people first begin to date, they are more attracted to the partners they deem to be more physically attractive 1. Another example of physical attraction as an influential factor of our attraction to others is seen in the matching hypothesis. The matching hypothesis proposes that the forming of a successful relationship is far more prone to occurring with people whom they consider to have an equal level of physical attractiveness to themselves.
Gangestad, S. (2006). Human sexual selection, good genes, and special design. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, (907)1, 50-61.
Our physical appearance counts all the time. It reflects who we are, how we carry ourselves, and how we represent the company we work for. All employers look for someone with a favorable appearance that sets a person to be competent, professional, and confident that will make an impact to their company. Either way we are judged by how we physically appear. Good appearance makes a person stand out among others especially when applying for a job. Besides having all the skills needed for the job, professional appearance helps a person to be noticed and recognized by employers. Physical appearance is also a factor of how a person feels about himself. Good appearance boosts self-confidence. It attracts positive energy which helps a person express oneself and makes others pay more attention to you.
When one sees someone that is, in one’s mind, extremely attractive, they want to continue to look at the attractive person, face, body, etc. According to a popular press article, human beings “apparently seek out the more attractive people because our brains give us a pat on the proverbial back when we lock eyes with” someone with a more aesthetically pleasing face (Lucas, 2014). One likes to continue looking at that person, face, body, etc. because one’s brain makes one feel better about viewing that person’s attractive face, body, etc.