Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities between human and chimpanzee behavior
Cultural similarities between humans and apes
Similarities between human and chimpanzee behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Similarities between human and chimpanzee behavior
Introduction
In this paper I will try to explain some of the differences and similarities that occur in both human and chimpanzee cultures concerning infanticide. I will first explain some of the reasons that chimpanzees practice infanticide and share a few examples of such. Then, I will do the same for human cultures which may not be as prominent as we believe but is still happening. Finally, I will compare the similarities and differences between the two, and show how chimpanzees and humans may not be that different after all in this regard.
Chimpanzee Infanticide
Chimpanzees react to infanticide in ways that may seem surprising to us. In fact, they often oppose it but there are differing hypotheses for this such as they share their disapproval
For example, it has been noted that in times when food or other resources are scarce that parents may in fact commit infanticide to lessen the burden of trying to provide more food for, according to Lund, “the least productive members of society,” (Lund 1985: 2). Infanticide is generally much more hidden in our society and actually happens in the hospitals, specifically the neonatal units(Lund 1985: 3). Infanticide occurs here when parents and doctors elect to stop treatment and or food supplies to young infants to cause their deaths when they deem that they would either not have a fulfilling live due to mental impairment or to a serious disease, such as spina bifida (Lund 1985: 3-5). There was one case of infanticide that caught the media’s attention several years ago. The case was about Baby Doe who suffered from Down Syndrome and an esophageal problem that led to him needing surgery to be able to eat, this is a fairly routine surgery that is common with children affected by Down Syndrome (Lund 1985: 21). The parents opted to not go through with the surgery while also opting to not feed their child through a feeding tube, thus causing his death of starvation (Lund 1985: 21). Lund also argues that, “the most common cases of infanticide concern the phenomenon of premature and low weight babies,” where parents and doctors elect not to treat
Many people would like to believe that we are vastly superior to chimpanzees, but based on these cases we are very similar to each other. When people discuss infanticide in chimpanzees they often think of them as primitive or incredibly violent, but when they hear of human individuals are committing infanticide, they blame it on different cultures and claim that they are better than that culture. No matter what they believe, infanticide is something that happens throughout the world both in human populations and other primate
Dr. Goodall is a well-known British primatologist who has discovered a substantial amount about primates in her many years of research. She has written numerous books, including one that we will be going into depth about called, “Through a Window.” Her book contains personal experiences, research findings, and even pictures to help the readers visualize her scientific breaking moments from her thirty years with the chimpanzees of Gombe. She states that there is are minor differences, and several similarities between humans and the chimpanzees. We will discuss these differences and similarities through their social behavior, intellectual ability, and emotions. To conclude, examine Goodall’s research to adopt what her findings can tell us about our early ancestors, and whether or not her study coincided to the steps of scientific methodology.
As our neighboring living families, chimpanzees as well as bonobos have been extensively used as prototypes of the behavior of early hominids. However, In modern years, as statistics on the social behaviors or conduct and ecosystem of bonobos has evidently come to light, a lot of interspecific assessments have been done. Chimpanzees have been described in terms of their intercommunity struggle, meat eating, infanticide, anthropogy, male position-striving, and supremacy over females. Bonobos, for the meantime, have been depicted as the ‘‘creator of love, but not a war’’ ape, categorized by female power-sharing, a deficiency of hostility between either characters or groups, expounded sexual behavior that happens without the restraint of a thin window of fruitfulness, and the usage of sex for communicative determinations. This paper evaluates the indication for this contrast and reflects the reasons that distinct portrayals of the two great apes have advanced.
Although the practice of collecting animals have been present since 2500 B.C (Dunlap and Kellert), efforts to keep animals in a safe and natural habitat have been poorly consummated. Psychological manipulation has consequentially drawn chimpanzees to mental illness, as in the article “How Abnormal Is the Behavior of Captive, Zoo-Living Chimpanzees?” Lucy P. Birkett and Nicholas E. Newton-Fisher wrote, “Many chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) kept in laboratory housing settings show a variety of serious behavioral abnormalities, such as, repetitive rocking, drinking of urine, or self-mutilation.” Social and maternal separation for the benifit of reasearch are linked to psychological traumatic as well (Dunlap and Kellert). Although through history the service of zoos have been for entertainment, it is a trivial reason for holding chimpanzees in confidment. Subsequently, it is inhumane to take primates from the wild and place them in a zoo, commercial, or laboratory setting, which strips them of their ability to act naturally.
Rollin, Bernard E.. “The Ascent of Apes — Broadening the Moral Community”. In The Great Ape Project. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin, 1993. pp.206-219.
Do non-human primates have culture? Discuss several studies of non-human primate behaviour and the evidence for the development of culture, or "proto-culture" among non-human primates. You may want to consider such aspects of their behaviour as reproductive strategies, aggression and conflict, or language capabilities and development, among others. How does the behavioural ecology of nonhuman primates inform us of the behaviour of our earliest ancestors?
Chimpanzees portray their emotions through a number of facial expressions and mannerisms. Just like humans, they undergo mood swings, jealous rages, and laughter. For instance, Goodall observed during her research that a male gorilla “would threaten [me] with an upward and backward movement jerk of his head…” Some of their emotions are easy to read, while at other times we have to look at multiple places on their faces to understand their feelings. A chimpanzee also uses its facial expressions and sounds to communicate with each other, such as hoots and yells.
In the article, “Of Primates and Personhood: Will According Rights and “Dignity” to Nonhuman Organisms Halt Research?”, author Ed Yong demonstrates the process of attempting rights for nonhuman creatures. He begins to create his claim by mentioning the Great Ape Project, and how much they have struggled so much with establishing rights for certain creatures that they just began to focus only on apes. Yong continues with the notions of others having a great dislike towards ape rights but makes a point by mentioning they are the most similar animals to us than any other. It seems that the US is the one to blame for stopping the rights but many continue to argue that they know how to protect each one and another, just as humans. His purpose is
Our earliest ancestors are primates. They are our closest relatives which is why we can see our behavior’s and practices in them. If we observe them we can get a better understanding of them and us, human beings. But unfortunately we all don’t get the chance to see a Primate right in our backdoor. So the best thing I could do for my observation was to visit them at the zoo.
Inside the chimp habitat, I noticed a sign which read: Look here for a “zoo” born! When I saw it, I recalled that earlier during the day, a senior docent named Rhonda who worked with the gorillas had told me that there was recently a newborn chimp. She said to look very closely to find the baby because the mother was extremely protective of it. She had also mentioned that the newborn’s furless skin would be very pink. At first, I looked very keenly for the small new chimp who had just been born this year, but I couldn’t find it. I finally spotted the baby after I moved to a different position to view the chimps from the open air viewing area. The infant was just as Rhonda had described it: nestled in its mother’s arms as she shielde...
This article, titled Common Ground, written by Barbara Smuts, points out the main differences between humans and apes, such as our upright stance, large brains, and capacity for spoken language and abstract reasoning. However, the main point of this article is to emphasize the many similarities that apes share with us. Smuts goes into great detail about how human social and emotional tendencies are very reflective in the family of apes.
Chimpanzees are a lot like humans in their behaviours. They are extremely smart since they are able to make and use tools and weapons. The female mothers are very affectionate and protective over the young and the rest of their family. The young chimps are also very dependant on their mother for necessities such as food, shelter and warmth.
Caplan, A., & Arp, R. (2014). The deliberately induced abortion of a human pregnancy is not justifiable. Contemporary debates in bioethics (pp. 122). Oxford, West Sussex: Wiley.
Celli, Maura L., Satoshi Hirata, and Masaki Tomonaga. "Socioecological Influences On Tool Use In Captive Chimpanzees." International Journal Of Primatology25.6 (2004): 1267-1281. Academic Search Premier. Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
This view, that humans are of special moral status, is constantly attempted to be rationalized in various ways. One such defense is that we are not morally wrong to prioritize our needs before the needs of nonhuman animals for “the members of any species may legitimately give their fellows more weight than they give members of other species (or at least more weight than a neutral view would grant them). Lions, too, if they were moral agents, could not then be criticized for putting other lions first” (Nozick, 79). This argument, that we naturally prefer our own kind, is based on the same fallacy used by racists while defending their intolerant beliefs and therefore should be shown to have no logical merit.
Even pro-choice advocates disagree on the circumstances that validate abortion. There is little or no argument against the current abortion of fetuses with genes for Down Syndrome. I speculate that controversy would ensue if the abortion of fetuses with fatal but less debilitating diseases, such as diabetes, became commonplace. I propose the following question: what makes a genetic disease or disability severe enough to validate selective abortion of an affected fetus? Pernick discusses the meaning of health, indicating that an individual who is unable to complete a physical or mental task that others can do has a disability. If people with below-average IQ have low probability of obtaining jobs with above-average salaries in spite of their efforts, are they unhealthy (Lemonick 57-8)? In our society, are homosexuals considered diseased (Henry 3,6)? Is an ugly person who cannot find a mate, in a sense, disabled? The abortion of individuals who do not exhibit desirable aesthetic traits may seem extreme. However, with no laws regulating such abortions, I speculate that some would take place. Because I believe that unwanted children should not be born regardless of their health status, I do not propose laws that disallow abortions of fetuses deemed healthy by medical standards. Instead, I propose laws regulating pre-natal screening. We should only screen embryos and fetuses for 'abortion-worthy' diseases. These "abortion-worthy" diseases should be designated by a national bioethics committee not unlike the one currently headed by Kass (Gibbs). While every condition should be analyzed independently, all should have common, identifying characteristics.