Howard Hendricks Weaknesses

745 Words2 Pages

Howard G. Hendricks was born and raised in Philadelphia and was a self-described troublemaker during his childhood and credited one of his primary school teachers with believing in him and starting him on his path as an educator. He graduated from Wheaton College and earned a BA in Christian education and a year later in June 14, 1947 he married Jeanne Wolfe, a classmate who also attended Wheaton. After Wheaton, he graduated from Dallas Theological Seminary in May of 1950 with a Th.M. In August 1951, he taught part time at the request of former school president John Walvoord and since then taught over 10,000 students in total. He served as a chaplain for the Dallas Cowboys Football Team for 8 years and made such a lasting impact that he received …show more content…

The 3rd is activity. Teachers must find activity in which students can engage in expressing their own thoughts, without feeling oppressed into thinking in a way the teachers wish, and apply the activity to real life or in other words “bridge the gap”. The 4th category is communication and this coincides to thoughts, actions, and feelings. Teachers should care more deeply about what their students think, get feedback, and make learning clear, concise, and compelling. The fifth is the law of the heart which also relates to the idea of emotions but gathers the concept of ethos(character-which draws the reader to learn), pathos( having a compassionate atmosphere to ensure motivation for the student), and logos( logic and putting forth that evidence). The 6th category is the law of encouragement which uses intrinsic motivation, comes from one’s own motivation, and extrinsic comes from outside sources. The teacher then decides what motivation will be best. The 7th and final category is the law of readiness, which is the teaching-learning process between the student and …show more content…

I appreciated how this notion can correlate to the law of the heart, which goes to demonstrate how your ethos and pathos can make class inviting and as a result, students will be motivated to do their best to learn. However, I did interpret his passage in regards to thinking differently. I believed he was claiming there was only one correct way of thinking. I understood how thinking could change behavior and still believed thinking was important in order to develop a worldview. “People accept what they feel disposed to accept, and they reject what they feel disposed to reject”. I agreed with this notion and also agreed with the fact that at times individuals can resist change in their ways of thinking. However, I did not agree with this following statement: “if I have negative feelings about you, I will reject what you’re saying because I reject you.” If I were to know a person I absolutely was not fond of but that person gave evidence for his claims then, there’s a chance I may agree with him because he conveyed his thoughts well. I may not like him as a person, but I may agree with some of his thinking. What was disheartening for me to be reminded of whilst reading this book is America’s public school/university’s education. Public school teachers and professors simply teach subjects and don’t “bridge the gap” or get personal with their students. Hendricks’ methods are unlikely to be applicable to these areas, except for thinking. More public

Open Document