Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
employee evaluation and compesation
employee evaluation and compesation
the impact of performance appraisal on employee performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: employee evaluation and compesation
Based on our findings, performance appraisal is able to provide employees with feedback about their performance. XX Therefore, the supervisors should evaluate their employees because through performance appraisal evaluation, the supervisor is able to measure their employees’ level of performance and able to provide them feedback for further improvement on their weaknesses because supervisor is more experience on the daily process compare to the employees. For example, through performance appraisal, the supervisor is able to know and point out the weaknesses of the employees as well as giving them a chance to improve their weakness. Moreover, the position of supervisor is higher than the employees therefore he or she has the authority that empower by the top management to evaluate the employees’ performance. Supervisor is also known as first-line manager who led, monitors, and regulate the employees’ performance, attitudes, strength and weaknesses in their departments. Thus, if the employees are not able to perform well in that department, the supervisor can evaluate them and determine their strength so that the supervisor can knows which job is suitable for the employees and transfer them to that department. In addition, the supervisor also has the responsibility to provide aims and specific targets that should be achieved by the employees within the time frame because supervisor is a leader among all the employees in the department. So if the employee cannot complete their job responsibility that set by the supervisor on time, the supervisor can record down and evaluate their works capabilities. For example, supervisor has the responsible to provide clearly path and direction for the employees and this can helps them to have b... ... middle of paper ... ...ctives (MBO) in the company. Therefore, two ways communication and feedback is important because it helps the employees to have further improvement on their skill and weaknesses. Individual evaluation method such as checklist and weighted check list is one of the methods that used to evaluate the employees individually by the supervisor. It is a simplest form, a set of objectives or descriptive statement that frequently used to evaluate the employees’ behaviour. Weighted checklist is variation of the checklist which used to evaluate the effective and ineffective employees’ behaviour on jobs. The rating score of the checklist will helps the supervisor to evaluate the performance of the employee and rated the employees from the excellent to the poor follow the ranking. However, this method is similar to critical incident technique which is costly and time consuming.
Supervisors, running a company, need to have 100% accountability of their employees. This is so that if someone else asks about a certain employee, the supervisor can give an accurate record of when the employee came in, where they can be found, and when their shift ends.
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
Employees spend a great portion of their time at work, and therefore must be comfortable in their knowledge and familiar with their surroundings. It is the supervisor's responsibility to familiarize the employee with the workplace. The supervisor is also responsible for continuous training. The new employee will regularly have questions, and the supervisor is their main source of information.
Performance appraisals are used administratively whenever they are the basis for a decision about the employee’s work conditions, including promotions, terminations, and rewards. (Gomez-Mejia, 2012, p.223). Performance appraisals compare work performed against measurable objectives that the employee and supervisor agreed to at the beginning of the appraisal period (smallbusiness.chron.com). If the employee does not meet the objectives as agreed upon, this may have a downstream effect on their salary, chances for advancement, and it could lead to termination. The manager plays a critical role in the administrative process of the performance appraisal. When the manager conducts the performance appraisal, it must be thorough, accurate and performed on a timely basis. In a situation where the employee is terminated due to their appraisal and rating, the business might find itself having to defend its validity.
Performance appraisal in most organizations is perceived as a critical human resource management function. It is believed that a well-designed and implemented performance appraisal system can offer the employee, the supervisor, and the organization several benefits, such as providing supervisors a useful communication instrument for the employee goal setting and performance planning, increasing employee
It is imperative for supervisors to focus on what is required in order for his/her employees to accomplish their job. They must be supportive of their employees and provide continual feedback on their job performance .Supervisor need to include their employees when making changes that effect they way they perform their jobs or finding new way to do things that were problematic. Supervisors should give their employees more responsibly to make them feel more valued and powerful. There is also a major need for promotion, pay increase and compensation system (educational reimbursement, vacation incentives etc.
There is an array of key components and factors involved in making an organization a successful business. One of those elements consists on evaluating employee’s performance; this sole component is critical in determining how effective is the organization’s productivity and which are the necessary steps to ensure proper functioning. “The performance appraisal may be one of the few times during the year where an employee and the reviewer, typically the employee's supervisor, can sit down and have a lengthy face-to-face discussion about all aspects of the job” (Joseph, 2016). Employees’ performance assessment serves as an instrument to gather important information as to which areas of the job description are being performed according to standards
Hierarchical structure of organisation is the tradition form of organising a business. This can be best displayed in a shape of a pyramid, with the owner, CEO or Board of Directors at the top. This top level of management is concerned with planning organising and controlling. They are usually required to develop long and short term strategic plans to achieve the business objectives. They are also responsible for any change to the business such as a change in the Prime Function or introduction of a new product line. The second stage is the Middle Management which coordinates the activities of supervisors. It prepares policies and plans, and has the responsibility for its budgets and for appointing new employees. At the third level of the structure are the supervisors which have the power of concurrent control. They are the link between workers and the top level of management. They are chosen for their technical skills and ability to motivate others.
First off, the roles and responsibilities for each supervisor was not clearly defined. For example, one of the supervisors that Ouellette worked with did not understand what was expected of him as a department head. So he took it upon himself to manifest his own duty description in order to justify his position. Roles and responsibilities define what each person does in a company. Kumar (2013) states, “In order to effectively manage your staff and meet company objectives, it is important to provide everyone with a clear definition and understanding of their role, function, and responsibilities in the workplace. Failing to define workplace roles and responsibilities can create tension, mis-communication and inefficiency within your business” (Kumar, 2013, ¶. 3). Structure within an organization is critical and can play a significant role in how people are managed. The second part of this case study worked to the company’s advantage. Ouellette’s intent was for the supervisors to understan...
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
In classical performance appraisal the performance is measured against the organizational standards. It has many pitfalls like it is based on single evaluator, addresses only formal aspects of the job performance etc.. Supervisor is responsible for the feedback. Even though he takes inputs from others, the final call stays with him.
Assessment centers are mainly used to evaluate executive or supervisory potential. It is focused mostly on the observations of behaviors across a series of select exercises or work samples. The candidate is tested in different social situations using a number of assessor and procedures such as in-basket exercises, work groups, computer simulations, role-playing, and other similar activities which have some attributes that are essential for successful performance of the actual job. There are several characteristics that can be assessed in assessment centers, some include persuasive abilities, assertiveness, self confidence, communicating ability, planning and organizational ability, energy level, resistance to stress, decision making, administrative ability, sensitivity to feelings, and creativity and mental alertness. Having recorded the employee’s behavior the raters meet to discuss their pooled information and observations and, based on it, they give their assessment about the employee. At the end of the process, the employee is given feedback in terms of strengths and weaknesses. The advantages of the assessment center method are a well conducted assessment center can achieve better forecasts of future performance and progress than other appraisal methods, the evaluations are more accurate, there is minimum biasness, reliability, content validity, and predictive ability are high, the tests make sure the wrong people are not hired or promoted, and it clearly defines the criteria for selection and promotion. The disadvantages of the assessment center method are it is costly and time consuming, it discourages the poor performers, it causes suffocation to the solid performers, breeds unhealthy competition among employees, and bears adverse effects on those not
The performance appraisal system, In order to maintain productivity at its peak, employee performance and productivity were the keys to the company 's goal. Middle management (supervisors) maintained a "record-keeping duties". The employee performance evaluation was performed twice a year which focused on the criteria of quality, "dependability ideas and cooperation" and "output". Workers commitment to perform efficiently is highly practiced. Education policy has been a key to improved employees performance, thus, a welding school has been
It is the employee's perception of a situation that becomes the basis for his or her behavior. The employee who perceives his/her supervisor as a hurdle reducer who helps him/her do a better job and the employee who sees the same supervisor as "big brother, closely monitoring for every motion. The difference has nothing to do with the reality of the supervisor's actions; the difference in employee behavior is due to different perceptions.
...organizational annual pay and grading reviews, Performance appraisals generally review each individual's performance against objectives and standards for the trading year, agreed at the previous appraisal meeting. Performance appraisals are also essential for career and succession planning - for individuals, crucial jobs, and for the organization as a whole. Performance appraisals are important for staff motivation, attitude and behavior development, communicating and aligning individual and organizational aims, and fostering positive relationships between management and staff. Performance appraisals provide a formal, recorded, regular review of an individual's performance, and a plan for future development.