Karen Armstrong's Homo Religiosus: Analysis

1170 Words3 Pages

As children, we are often told stories, some of which may have practical value in the sense of providing young minds with lessons and morals for the future, whereas some stories create a notion of creativity and imagination in the child. In Karen Armstrong’s piece, “Homo Religiosus”, a discussion of something similar to the topic of storytelling could translate to the realm of religion. Armstrong defines religion as a, “matter of doing rather than thinking” (17) which she describes using an example in which adolescent boys in ancient religions, who were not given the time to “find themselves” but rather forced into hunting animals which ultimately prepares these boys to be able to die for their people, were made into men by the process of doing. …show more content…

This notion in regards to the question of why we tell stories in society similarly situates the same premises of telling a story for a moral reward or understanding where it up to the reader to interpret the text or in this case the belief. By understanding the context on an individual basis, one can also understand that throughout Armstrong’s argument, religion is not just a belief but rather, “an all-encompassing, wholly transcendent reality that lay[s] beyond neat doctrinal formulations,” (18) that presents the conclusion that without discipline, there is no method of attaining a practical sense of …show more content…

The same concept applies to religion where without a practical sense of the belief, there is no way to exercise the concept and ultimately follow that religion. Thinking and doing go hand in hand when applying the practical use of a “story”. However, the concept of “doing” is the main component of the two, by taking advantage of the practical use of a story, one is able to find the reasoning and morality behind the initial concept whereas by just thinking, anything is possible but that doesn’t mean it is also probable. This, for example, can be directly correlated to the main monotheistic religions where they all say to be a good person. However the practicality of the religion is not formed until the religious contexts are exercised and being a “good” person is truly understood on an individual basis. The notion of thinking can be useful however it serves more of an individual palate where the idea is taken in and only perceived by the specific individual which can be seen in the extremist’s perception of their specific followed beliefs but ultimately the notion of doing is more directly correlated with the topic of religion because it allows the individual to take in their surroundings in the process of doing and then perceive is on a more open-minded

Open Document