Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Marriage views through different cultures
Essays on the reformation
Marriage views through different cultures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Marriage views through different cultures
Henry Hobson runs a successful boot makers shop in nineteenth-century Salford. A widower with a weakness for the Moonraker’s club, he tries forcefully to run the lives of his three unruly daughters. When he decrees “no marriages” to avoid the expensive matter of settlements, eldest daughter Maggie rebels and sets her sights on Will Mossop, Hobson's star, but lower class boot maker. Maggie and Will leave to start up in competition, and she then turns her mind to helping her sisters marry their chosen partners. I personally feel that the title is base on the traditional saying, “Hobson’s choice” which means a person has no real choice at all; their only options being to either accept or refuse the offer that is given to you.
In the play Hobson's choice, there is no doubt that the character of Maggie represents a woman who is born before her time. She has a modern way of thinking and spends the entire play braking away from convention, this modern sprit reveals its self in a way that shows that she knows her own mind and takes charge of any situations. In addition to running the house she is responsible for running the business whilst she farther avoids the hard work of either by spending his time at The Moonraker’s club. Her sisters depend on her for providing a stable domestic atmosphere and her father is happy for her to assume the role of mother. During that period the role of women was significantly reduced when compared to the expectations of men. Whilst Maggie's role in running the home was not unusual at the time her role in running the shop would be seen as a seriously emancipating. Her practical presence and her proud independent nature make her a formidable figure. The Hobson family are oblivious to the hold that she has o...
... middle of paper ...
...an be seen throughout, however I think we are also supposed to feel sympathy for Maggie because she has such a modern mindset, but trapped in a world unaccustomed to her views and admire her as she manages to overcome her flaws to become the perfect wife with the perfect life. I feel that we are also supposed to also condemn the archaic views and stereotypes expressed throughout this amusing play.
I personally enjoyed the text as it challenged to outdated thinking of the period with revolutionary views and positions. I do feel that the play was let down however by Maggie reverting to the stereotypical house wife in the end. This gave the impression that all women want is to be a house wife, and this is simply not true. Other than this however I feel that the play was very informative of the roles of class at the time and how reputation and status meant everything.
...od out because he used charm and just the book to advance in the company. I think young adults and adults who are into economics, how companies work or even realistic plays would like the production that was put. It was simple and gave across a clear point. I think that people who grew up in the sixties and worked during the time period would enjoy the play. I feel that they would have a different understanding of it because they grew up in the time period and lived through what was going. Over all the play head a straight forward point that in my opinion put J. Pierrepont Finch as the protagonist because everything revolved around him, he had a simple objective and every set or choice he made effect something or someone. Whereas the antagonist was reaching high positions in the company because that was the main thing that was in Finch is way at achieving his goal.
In conclusion I think that the stage directions and dramatic irony are significant to the play, and without them there would be no need for a lot of the events that happen in the play.
Parry, Joseph D. "Interpreting Female Agency and Responsibility in The Miller's Tale and The Merchant's Tale." 80.2 (2001): 133-67. Academic Onefile. Web. 16 May 2013.
Nora and Mrs. Wright’s social standing when compared to the men in each play is inferior. Both works expose their respective male characters’ sexist view of women diminishing the women’s social standing. Each work features egotistical men who have a severely inflated view of their self-worth when compared to their female counterparts. The men’s actions and words indicate they believe women are not capable of thinking intelligently. This is demonstrated in “Trifles” when Mr. Hale makes the statement about women only worrying about mere trifles. It is also apparent in “A Dollhouse” when Torvalds thinks his wife is not capable of thinking with any complexity (Mazur 17). Another common attribute is of the women’s social standing is displayed as both women finally get tired of feeling like second class citizens and stand up to the repressive people in the women’s lives (Mulry 294). Although both women share much in common in their social standing there subtle differences. Torvald’s sexist view of Nora is more on a personal level in “A Dollhouse” while the male characters’ sexist views in “Trifles” seem to be more of a social view that women are not very smart and their opinions are of little value. This attitude is apparent in “Trifles” as Mr. Hale and Mr. Henderson’s comments about Mrs. Wright’s housekeeping (Mulry 293). As the women in both works reach their emotional
To begin, in both plays the men dismiss the women as trivial. In Trifles, when Mrs. Wright is being held in jail for the alleged murder of her husband, she worries about the cold weather and whether it will cause her fruit to freeze which will burst the jars. After the women come across a shattered jar of canned fruit, they converse about Mrs. Wright’s concern about the matter. Mrs. Peters states, “She said the fire’d go out and her jars would break” (Glaspell 918). The women here identify with Mrs. Wright’s concern, because they understand the hard work that goes into canning as part of the demanding responsibilities women endure as housewives. The Sheriff’s reply is “Held for murder and worryin’ about her preserves” (Glaspell 918). In other words, the men perceive the event as insignificant; they clearly see women as a subservient group whose concerns hold little importance. Likewise, the reader can relate to this treatment in A Dollhouse, when Torvald complains to Nora about spending Christmas time the previous year making frivolous ornaments instead of devoting it to family. Torvald says, “It was the dullest three weeks that I ever spent!” (Ibsen 1207). He believes her role i...
The Victorian era was remarkable for its rigid gender roles, which defined societal interactions. The prototypical Victorian woman existed in the domestic sphere, where she acted as a moral compass to guide her husband and children toward traditional morality. This vision was mostly limited to the middle and upper classes, but if her family’s circumstances were good, the Victorian woman might have spread her domestic, moralizing influence outside of her home to help the less fortunate. The Victorian man, on the other hand, occupied the public sphere, where he dealt with business and politics, and the more complex moral codes of the two. His home was a retreat, where he could take comfort in the morally upright space his wife made for him. However, as the period wore on, these strict gender roles proved to be too oppressive, and a “New Woman” emerged. The New Woman, as portrayed by Vivie Warren in Mrs. Warren’s Profession, steps out of the domestic sphere, a move that requires agency, moral complexity, and separation from – sometimes even emulation of – men. Because this stance was so different from the typical Victorian woman, it posed challenges not just for the New Women themselves, but for all members of society they interacted with.
In today's society, we generally view upon everyone as equal beings who deserve equal rights. At the turn of the 20th century, this particular view didn?t exist. Men clearly dominated almost every aspect of life and women were often left with little importance. The Wright?s embody this view of roles in Susan Glaspell?s play Trifles. Mrs. Wright was a typical woman who suffered the mental abuse from her husband and was caged from life. In Trifles, a mixture of symbolism of oppression illustrates Mrs. Minnie Wright?s motives to kill her husband and to escape from imprisonment.
To sum it up both of these plays share the same broad message conveyed throughout the entire play. Which includes, women have the capabilities to do more than they show and are allowed to do. As well as the relationship men and women share is not constant, or the same, there are many different views on the relationship they share and many different variations that change as time progresses. Furthermore the rights of women also change with much time, and hard work by many women who have worked hard for their rights and future rights of all women. Some of this can lead to these two plays, giving new, bold ideas that were frightening for many during their times but helped for the push for a better tomorrow.
My least favorite aspect of this play was the ending. The ending confused me and was anticlimactic. It was not funny and not entertaining at all.
At the beginning of the story, Anna is refusing Mr. Gordon’s proposal. Her refusal creates tension and conflict between her mother and herself. Then why can’t you marry Mr. Gordon, and make me happy?” “Because,” and Anna’s voice was firm decided and honest, “Because I do not love him, and to marry him would make me very unhappy.” (King 16) Mrs. Mansfield points out to Anna that Mr. Gordon would make an excellent husband with financial benefits. “Oh, my dear,” said Mrs. Mansfield, “You know how poor we are now. Here I am with you four girls and an income not much larger than your dear father’s time I spent upon my own dress. Is it wonderful that I long to see you settled?” (King17) What she is really saying, I do not have money for the family so get marry to this rich man .Mrs. Mansfield persuasion tactics demonstrate to Anna what she learned from her mother. Make good choices in life, marry, and love will come afterwards. In other words, sell yourself girlie! The author, Susan King, writes this statement, “What of the end of all this? Is this grand automation really dead, or does a heart, young and still untouched, lurk-strong, free and dangerous-in that quiet, unmoved and stately figure.” (King 40) Anna heart is not in love with Mr. Gordon and remains close to any emotions he has for her. Anna stands her ground to her mother.
In the 19th Century, women had different roles and treated differently compared to today’s women in American society. In the past, men expected women to carry out the duties of a homemaker, which consisted of cleaning and cooking. In earlier years, men did not allow women to have opinions or carry on a job outside of the household. As today’s societies, women leave the house to carry on jobs that allow them to speak their minds and carry on roles that men carried out in earlier years. In the 19th Century, men stereotyped women to be insignificant, not think with their minds about issues outside of the kitchen or home. In the play Trifles, written by Susan Glaspell, the writer portrays how women in earlier years have no rights and men treat women like dirt. Trifles is based on real life events of a murder that Susan Glaspell covered during her work as a newspaper reporter in Des Moines and the play is based off of Susan Glaspell’s earlier writing, “A Jury of Her Peers”. The play is about a wife of a farmer that appears to be cold and filled with silence. After many years of the husband treating the wife terrible, the farmer’s wife snaps and murders her husband. In addition, the play portrays how men and women may stick together in same sex roles in certain situations. The men in the play are busy looking for evidence of proof to show Mrs. Wright murdered her husband. As for the women in the play, they stick together by hiding evidence to prove Mrs. Wright murdered her husband. Although men felt they were smarter than women in the earlier days, the play describes how women are expected of too much in their roles, which could cause a woman to emotionally snap, but leads to women banding together to prove that women can be...
Many women in modern society make life altering decisions on a daily basis. Women today have prestigious and powerful careers unlike in earlier eras. It is more common for women to be full time employees than homemakers. In 1879, when Henrik Ibsen wrote A Doll's House, there was great controversy over the out come of the play. Nora’s walking out on her husband and children was appalling to many audiences centuries ago. Divorce was unspoken, and a very uncommon occurrence. As years go by, society’s opinions on family situations change. No longer do women have a “housewife” reputation to live by and there are all types of family situations. After many years of emotional neglect, and overwhelming control, Nora finds herself leaving her family. Today, it could be said that Nora’s decision is very rational and well overdue.
2. Consider the women, particularly with regard to their age. In light of their health and their isolation, how does Tea Party present the circumstances of the aged? How can the play be constructed as a social/political argument, with elderly as a
This fact plays a crucial role in the mood of the play. If the reader understands history, they also understand that women did not really amount to any importance, they were perceived more as property.
Women in the nineteenth century had the expectation to marry men with high social status and wealth, rather than from love or security. Austen’s perspective is that marital contentment is purely a matter of choice. Moreover, in a conversation in the novel about a woman’s place in society with Captain Wentworth, Mrs. Croft responds, “I hate to hear you [talk] … as if women were all fine ladies, instead of rational creatures” (Austen