12 Years A Slave, And Django Unchained: Film Analysis

1252 Words3 Pages

The history of the slave era has been consistent throughout the past years whether it is told through textbooks or documentaries. Slavery through history is remembered as an era in which thousands of individuals were robbed from their freedom and treated with mass cruelty. History generally goes into depth on what slavery was and why it lasted for over two centuries, and the reason being is that African Americans were viewed as extremely profitable property, not as actual living human beings, “the sense of the humanity of these people were simply suppressed for the sake of gold” (“Africans in America” 1998). Another point to mention is the fact that history focuses on the overall picture of slavery and what it was, not necessarily what impact it had on African Americans and the individual hardships they endured.
In regards to how America remembers slavery through entertainment, the accuracy is surprisingly similar to how American history remembers it, with even more focus on individuals rather than the overall picture. However, only a handful of certain films in entertainment actually reflect slavery, two being “12 Years a Slave” and “Django Unchained.” In such films, slavery is mostly seen through the life of one individual slave, the film focuses on how that certain individual ended up as a slave, which correlates to …show more content…

After Django finished his job with Dr. Schultz as a bounty hunter he committed himself to "find my wife, and buy her freedom,” (Tarantino “Django Unchained”). Although the occurrence of an African American having a job with a white bounty hunter and then being freed to later go on to buy his wife’s freedom is not heard of in history, the message behind the film was probably to demonstrate how many African Americans felt when being separated from their families/loved

Open Document