Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of prose
In 2007, AT&T ran a commercial that would soon become viral due to its tongue-in-cheek representation of teenagers speaking “shorthand”. The commercial starts with a mother upset at her daughter for her excessive texting. The commercial gained popularity for its tagline, which appears after the mother asks, “Who have you been texting fifty times a day?” to which the daughter replies, “IDK my BFF Jill.” AT&T’s caricature of the 2007 preteen was closer to the truth than they would have thought. In today’s society, acronyms such as “LOL”, “OMG”, “IDK”, and “WTF” have breached the English language and are used commonly in every day conversation. How have the acronyms used in texting made an established presence in the English language? I plan to look at the origins of these acronyms and discover the transition from coded language to common use.
The History of the Acronym
The history of acronyms begins with the turn of the millennium. The earliest recorded acronyms were crafted by Hebrews and Romans, choosing to write abbreviations to save both time and space in their writings. In an article published by the American
…show more content…
It would still take years before SMS could be introduced to the public market due to the fact that phones didn’t have keyboards at the time. The first system of typing on the phone, called the Multi-tap system, was used with the number pad but was still too inefficient to be accepted by the average cell phone user. In fact, in 1995, the average user was sending 0.4 SMS messages a month (Crystal 3). Texting took a while to catch on. Even after five years of use, the average user was still only sending 35 messages a month. With the development of full QWERTY keyboards and structured plans by providers, texting began to gain traction. The growth of the use of texting is astounding. David Crystal, in his paper Txtng: The Gr8 Db8, records the
The time before cell phones were popular and everyone needed to have one people had other ways to communicate, like emails, sending letters back and forth and extra. Not saying that people still do not communicate
In the article, “Does Im Make U dum”, the author states how instant messaging has made us become “dum”. The issue of using popular texting abbreviations like, “lol”, “brb”, or “gtg” can either be an effective or unproductive way of expression. Using abbreviations through texting are so commonly used by children, teenagers, and adults. Statistics show that children are younger than ever for when they are first exposed to mobile phones and text messaging. A 2005 ChildWise study that one-in-four children under the age of eight had a mobile phone.
Texting is a newer, shorter and very convenient method of sending messages back and forth between users on a cell phone. It is similar to email, but often using shorter messages to carry on a conversation between two or more people. Texting is fast and easy,
I heard some funny retro expression like “JK,” which means one is “just kidding,” and “on the square,” which means one is not. I heard a familiar “JBF” and “TIMATOV!” but also “TPR!” and the “CFG!” “TMS!” (temporary motion sickness?), “KOT!,” and the more universal “Cute!” This is just how people talk, I thought to myself. Feel the wonder of the
“Our generation doesn't ring the doorbell. They text or call to say they're outside,” this line is from one of the well-known social networks, Tweeter, which shows how the way of communication has change in this modern life. According to 2013 statistics by Business Insider, in United States alone, smartphone owners aged 18 to 24 send 2,022 texts per month on average — 67 texts on a daily basis — and receive another 1,831 texts (Cocotas). Nowadays, technology such as text messaging has practically replaced traditional face to face communication among the society primarily in young generations because texting allows messages to be sent fast and effortless. In order to quickly type what they are trying to say in text messaging, people are frequently using textspeak; the language created by using abbreviation rather than complete words. Based on this phenomenon, David Crystal, an honorary professor of linguistics at the University of Wales has published an article entitled ‘2b or not 2b?’ in the Guardian on July 5, 2008 comes out with the research and studies that state texting can actually improve the literacy of children and create creativity of writing. However, by observing more critically, texting do decrease a person’s ability to switch between textspeak and the normal rules of grammar and adversely affect formal writing and conversational skills.
In support of this blind conformity in people, Blakinger identifies many instances in which people in today’s society blindly accept and follow trends which are imposed upon them through modern technology. Through cell phones, many people access social media platforms, which impose selected messages by advertisers unto easily impressionable users. The presence of Newspeak is simultaneously present in the world of modern technology. Blakinger describes the idea of Newspeak as “where words are strung together and abbreviated to create new words,” which on the elemental level is identical to the use of texting slang. In 1984, it is used to remove words from its language and create a universal common vocabulary.
It's taking over our lives. We can do it almost anywhere. What is it? It's texting! Texting is a reliable, easy and convenient form of communication that is most commonly used by, but not limited to millenials and those in the workforce. Many people use it as a way to express themselves as well. In Michaela Cullington’s article, “Does Texting Affect Writing?” she targets two different attitudes in relation to texting. Cullington explains that there is often an assumption that students who use abbreviations when they text, will bring those same abbreviations over to their formal writing pieces. Cullington then adds that the other attitude in relation to writing skills and texting insists that texting is harming student’s writing capabilities. Because of her research as well as experiments done by other colleagues of hers, it shows that
My advice to those who remain skeptical is to view the matter differently and think about the positive that can come from this “new” form of communication, versus the negative. Everything will always have a little of both, so it comes down to perception and how you chose to look at it. If used efficiently, text messaging can spark ingenuity into the minds of messengers and can convey content-heavy messages without all the messy nonverbals lurking around. What if we as a society had banned the printing press when it first arrived because we believed it to be, as Crystal adds, “the invention of the devil because it would put false opinions into people’s minds”? There will come a time when we will laugh at the ridiculous opposition that met text messaging, as we presently do about telephones and the printing press long ago.
Since the Industrial Revolution, technology has permeated and become an integral part of our everyday lives. In fact, a life without technology seems almost impossible to imagine. Almost everyone, around the globe, has access to technology in one form or another. Consequently this type of technology has become ingrained into our culture. Its roots are so deep that it is now peculiar to see someone without a smartphone than with one. Consequently, smartphones and the Internet have radically changed the manner in which we communicate and how we communicate with one another. Our speech has metamorphosed so much from that of our grandparents that it almost seems like a foreign language due to the incorporation of slang and “text talk.” With the sudden surge of email, blogs, and instant messaging that occurred within the last couple of decades, the impact that technology has on our linguistics has become more pronounced. Technology has helped to bridge the gap between people by allowing us to communicate as easily as we breathe. On this note, one would think that the dawn of the Era of Technology would give birth to a renaissance of the English language but, instead, the converse is taking place. With such widespread prevalence of technology such as smartphones and computers, the degradation of the English language is a problem now more than ever.
With all forms of communication, many often obsess over how every human being should abide by a set of guidelines. What language should we use? How should traditional methods be implemented into new methods of communication such as texting? Do we penalize those who refuse to use these conservative forms of language? It is no doubt that these questions are explored in Dan Bilefsky's article titled "Period. Full Stop. Point. Whatever It's Called, It's Going Out of Style." Bilefsky argues that traditional functions of language, such as the period, are dying with new tools that promote the use of informal speech. More specifically, he exclaims that the period, when rarely used, expresses emotions now unlike its traditional purpose of simply putting
I heard some funny retro expression like “JK,” which means one is “just kidding,” and “on the square,” which means one is not. I heard a familiar “JBF” and “TIMATOV!” but also “TPR!” and the “CFG!” “TMS!” (temporary motion sickness?), “KOT!,” and the more universal “Cute!” This is just how people talk, I thought to myself. Feel the wonder of the
An acronym is formed from the first or multiple letters to form a word or phrase. (Psych Central Staff, n.d.) Since acronyms can vary in complexity, grade school educators teach students frequently teach important words or phases base on education level. For example, in elementary children learn “ROY G. BIV” to memorise the colours of the rainbow, and university students use “Paul Clark Our Friendly Grief Spreader” to remember taxonomy groupings Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus and Species. As a student, I must remind myself through the famous abbreviation mnemonic coined from Kelly Johnson: K.I.S.S (Keep It Simple Stupid).
Step onto any college campus and take a look around. You will find clumps of students standing around in circles, phones in hand, typing away. What is it they are doing? Texting. Ever since the first text message was sent in 1993, the use of text messaging as a means of communication has spread like wild fire, especially amongst the adolescent generation. And with this new form of communication a new language has appeared; text-speak, the shortening of common words into abbreviations and acronyms (Drouin 49). While texting and the text-speak language seem to have been welcomed by many, what affect is this new technology having on the way we communicate? Is it possible that texting is negatively affecting our ability to use formal written communication, or is this idea just a myth perpetuated by negative media attention? And what changes has texting brought to the way we communicate person-to person? Are these changes positive, negative, or perhaps a mixture of both?
With the constant use of various forms of technology, communication via texting has become a very popular leisure activity for people all over the world. While texting, an individual automatically utilize different symbols and shorthand words to save time and space. For example, when texting, one is given a certain amount of characters that they can use within the message. To save space, the individual would use words such as “u” to replace the word you, “btw” for by the way, and “c u l8r” to refrain from writing out see you later. The problem with using shorthand words to text evokes grammar issues and not being able to transition smoothly from texting a friend and writing a paper for an English
Technology has brought about argument on whether we are in the illiteracy age or literacy age. Why some researchers believe that the younger generation writes far more than any generation before them because of the so much socializing that takes place online, while others who think that this generation has produce more illiterate people, points to social networking as the cause. They believe that social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter and so on has attributed to sloppy writing and careless reading. The use of abbreviation or short slangs like lol, brb has become the other of the day.