Arguments Against Police Policing

857 Words2 Pages

Police pursing fleeing cars is an essential practise to bring an end to unjust offences and protect the general public. The New Zealand pursuit policy takes place when a driver who has been signalled to stop by police fail to and try to escape apprehension, so police take action to detain the offender (Policepolicy 2010 pg 5).
This is a complex argument as police pursuits are viewed as a danger to citizens involved, causing injury or death. But fatalities are a direct result of drivers’ conducts toward the police and pursuit policy; which is continuously being amended for police to perform efficiently.

(C-Arg1)Research shows that New Zealand has seen an increase of deaths related to this issue. The role of policing on the road is at conlfict with the publics’ safety interests, police continuting lethal force chase policy despite repeat requests from the IPCA to be reassessed. (Policepolicy 2010 p 34). Statistics are rising and have confirmed between 2000 and 2008, 38% were seriously injured and 17% were killed due to the pursuit ending in a crash (Plowman, 2010). …show more content…

Those who argue to stop police pursuits, draw attention to the agency of police. This attitude is negated as recorded pursuits in 2009 has seen 28% of those that have been abandoned, which is high from 2008, which was 26% (policepolicy 2010 p 22). The policy and the restrictions put in place, equip officers to deal professionally and safely with a pursuit, indicating these percentages are likely to rise as the policy is

Open Document