The first step of the scientific method is to ask questions about the topic. For example, who will win the presidential election and why? After the questions have been asked, a hypothesis can be formed. Donald Trump will win the election, is a hypothesis because it’s an educated guess with no evidenced supporting it. Sociologists would need to research and collect data from the votes of the people which can then be used as proof to back up their hypothesis. Using credible and citing sources is a good way to ensure the evidence gathered is reliable and valid because credible sources are supported with facts. Reliability ensures that the data can be reproduced consistently and the validity ensures the precision of the evidence.
The type of data collection a sociologist would use for a political election is called a survey, which is the next step in the scientific method. A survey is quantitative research method used gather a large amount of data sampled from a random pool. The Am...
... middle of paper ...
...sed to determine the outcome of a result. The scientific method allows researchers to provide accurate data. This includes political polls, life expectancy, divorces, or graduation rates.
It’s important that sociologists ask questions to provide a basis to their argument and form hypothesis in order to start collecting data. Data that is collected from individuals should always be safe and participants should never be placed in danger. After data has been collected and researched, it will be tested and reproduced to ensure the accuracy of the results. The job of the researcher is to ensure data is consistent and reliable. Once the data is reliable and valid, the researchers can publish their material and state a theory. A theory is an organized set of concepts that explain the body of data. The point of the scientific method is to make sociologists critically think.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- When we analyze historical situations we usually look at the superficial facts that make the story and base our reaction to those facts. Although mostly everyone can say that certain events, such as those that transpired on September 11, 2001, are tragic some people will look and analyze the situation differently. We can apply the same concept to historiography and how different schools of historiography analyze the situation and question the situation in a different manner. I will be analyzing three schools and try to decide what questions each school would ask in trying to understand what happened or why they might have happened.... [tags: Scientific method, Science, History, Al-Qaeda]
1177 words (3.4 pages)
- By the 17th century, certain scholars were losing patience with the unsatisfactory answers of traditional authoritative texts to explain natural enigmas. Furthermore, thanks to the Protestant Revolution, religious fanatics began appearing among the laity, and the practice of witch hunts became rampant throughout Europe--spreading fear and confusion in a desperate attempt to restore confidence in traditional authoritative texts such as the Bible. Consequently, when certain scholars such as Galileo Galilei began to exclude scripture or ancient texts from their research, a huge uproar awoke among high religious officials and fanatics alike.... [tags: Scientific method, Science, Scientific revolution]
1345 words (3.8 pages)
- Thomas S. Kuhn’s, “The Nature of Necessity of Scientific Revolutions” want us to understand that the nature of the universe is evolving because people gain new knowledge in science. He addresses that as the universe is evolving human beings aquire new knowledge in science. In Kuhn’s work he mentions, “Simultaneously we have had to alter the fundamental structural elements of which the universe to which they apply is composed.” From this I understood that the universe is growing and human beings are expanding their knowledge and discovering new things, all thanks to the evolution of the universe.... [tags: Science, Scientific method, Scientific revolution]
776 words (2.2 pages)
- Is Scientific Progress Inevitable. The Development Study of Advances in Technology According to the article “is scientific progress inevitable?” can understand that advances in technology are in the order of nature and advances in technology are regular. This article may be expanded many ideas about the progress and development of technology. Technology must be progress, but the progress of scientific discovery may not be able to promote social development in a short time. Although the power source of social development is the advancement of technology, but technology discovery just a part of system and it is an integral part, but only "essential" conditions, rather than "full" cond... [tags: Technology, Science, Scientific method, Human]
980 words (2.8 pages)
- Steven Shapin’s book entitled Scientific Revolution begins with the provoking statement that “there was no such thing as a Scientific Revolution” (197). However, he incorporates the stories about the frontiers of scientific tradition and discovery such as Galileo, Boyle, Newton, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and Huygens. Nonetheless, Shapin organizes the book into two parts with the first concerning its organization. It is divided into three sections that ask three essential questions: what was known.... [tags: Science, Scientific method, Early modern period]
1164 words (3.3 pages)
- The scientific revolution began with Copernicus in the Western Europe and ended with Isaac Newton 150 years later. During this century and a half of innovation, numerous achievements were made in science and astronomy. The modern scientific method was sculpted and refined in this era, the mechanical philosophy was elaborated and important discoveries were made concerning gravity, the skeletal and muscular systems of the human body and the rotations of the planets (Hatch).Church was still a big part of people’s life during this time period.... [tags: Isaac Newton, Scientific method, Science]
1177 words (3.4 pages)
- The Rationality of Scientific Discovery: The Aspect of the Theory of Creation ABSTRACT: In order to understand the rationality of scientific creation, we must first clarify the following: (1) the historical structure of scientific creation from starting point to breakthrough, and then to establishment; (2) the process from the primary through the productive aspects of the scientific problem, the idea of creation, the primary conjecture, the scientific hypothesis, and finally the emergence of the genetic structure establishing the theory; and (3) the problem threshold of rationality in scientific creation.... [tags: Philosophical Science Scientific Papers]
2759 words (7.9 pages)
- There were three major revolutions at work during the sixteenth through the eighteenth centuries, the scientific revolution, the enlightenment revolution and the political revolution. All of these revolutions have shaped western thought and ideals to this day and continue even in this age to shape western thoughts and ideals. What brought us to our thinking of today. Which, if any of the three, were the most important in shaping our thoughts on science, politics, and our social structures. Or were each an independent revolution without consequences on the others.... [tags: Enlightenment, Political Revolution]
1084 words (3.1 pages)
- The reliability and usefulness of a theory in psychology is extremely important as psychology can deal with very sensitive topics, help implement social policies and treat patients. As psychology is a subject that is involved in a number of areas, the theories that are posited by researchers need to be as accurate as possible. One way to do this is to look back in history and find examples of good scientific practices and understand what made them good. John Snow is known today as a monumental figure in the creation of modern epidemiology (Simmons, 2002) as he was the person to eradicate the cholera outbreaks from the 19th century that have completely ravaged Europe.... [tags: Scientific method, Science, Theory, Research]
1293 words (3.7 pages)
- Karl Popper's Falsifiability Sir Karl Popper's lecture was very thought provoking concerning "where to draw the line." Unlike most people, the validity of the theory was not his concern as much as how that validity is determined. This is an issue that really does not get the attention that it deserves. Popper's claims concerning, "When should a theory be ranked as scientific?" and "Is there a criterion for the scientific character or status of a theory?" seems to be put together in the following summary.... [tags: Scientific Method Science]
978 words (2.8 pages)