The Historical Construction of the Supper

2349 Words5 Pages

Opening
In the New Testament we should be struck by the utter ease that defined life in the first churches. We are given a wide image of church existence, but many particulars - which are annoying for us - are left unaffected by the New Testament. As time elapsed, the observable church lost its first simplicity and became enmeshed in a quagmire of ecclesiastical machines and theological speculation.
The Lord's Supper is a precedent. There's a simplicity about that ordinance in the sketchy New Testament data. Yet in post-apostolic times the remembrance meal became embedded in hierarchical church structures to ensure that it became a mysterious ritual to be "administered" by the "ordained," and ended up being the supply of endless speculation about "what happens" in the "sacrament."
Evidence suggests that this memorial meal, and the instruction which supported it, was a center point in Christian units (cf. Acts 20:7). Eating together in the "breaking of bread" and recalling God the Father in the Meal were nearly synonymous in Christian worship. Naturally, many things have changed in our practice considering from the start. In this essay, compare them with your ideas and techniques - and I would want to explore some fundamental factors concerning the Lord's Supper - based on 1 Corinthians 11:17-34.
The Historical Construction of the Supper
To start with, it will likely be beneficial to isolate the three fold historical construction which exists in the association of the Supper itself. Only by holding these three outlooks in proper equilibrium can we even hope to approach the Supper correctly.
1. Remember Yesteryear
In God's Supper we recall the past. The covenant that provides us the pardon of sins was ratified, or "cut," by the shed...

... middle of paper ...

...a fellowship meal. Rather, when we get a vision of the kind of fellowship and treatment which should characterize Christian assemblages, we are going to find the worth, benediction and sophistication of remembering the Lord together in a meal circumstance. Altering a sort cannot create life. Instead, energetic life provides with it a strong want to use those sorts that will maximize sophistication.
They could freely work out creative approaches to execute a remembrance meal that fulfills the requirements and specifics of the circumstances, as churches get ahold of New Testament principles. I really believe that lots of saints understand (painfully) in their hearts that there is something missing in the churches' practice of the Supper. May considered of the historical arrangement and environment of the Supper assist us in recovering the facts because it is in Jesus.

Open Document