Analysis Of High Maintenance

1024 Words3 Pages

High Maintenance is a web series which allows glimpses into people’s everyday lives in a diverse and insightful way. It is available on the website ‘Vimeo’, with four of the ‘cycles’ (seasons) available for free and the fifth one for a low price, with the episodes varying in length (usually shorter than 15 minutes). The series follows the character known as ‘The Guy’, a marijuana dealer who delivers to these people’s homes. Each episode features a different person, couple or group and “The Guy” acts as the audience’s ‘window’ to each, although he often features very little in each episode. This essay analyses High Maintenance through the episodes of “Rachel”, “Helen” and “Matilda” and discusses how the episodes uses space while linking it …show more content…

This portrait of the ‘dad’ in an otherwise ‘normal’ family (that is involving a heterosexual couple with a child, mirroring a ‘nuclear family’) can be seen as ‘queer’, as it deconstructs the idea of hetereonormative normality. The episode itself is self-reflexive in the way in acknowledges its ‘queerness’ when the writer’s mentor tells him to re-write the emasculated main character in his script as someone more manly. Needham negotiates ‘space’ through the idea of ‘temporality’ in which queer storylines occupy spaces of strange temporalities (151). High Maintenance occupies a space of strange temporality as it’ characters often don’t have a future. Normative time and space relies on its characters being given a linear progression, one that makes sense within the heteronormative context (Needham 150). With ‘Rachel’ and indeed all episodes, the time given to characters is ephemeral, often robbed of having satisfying conclusions in terms of their future. No episode is better at demonstrating this than ‘Helen’. Although ‘Rachel’ demonstrates a character within the institution of “family, heterosexuality, and reproduction”, ‘Helen’ introduces the viewer to a character who is agoraphobic, buying marijuana with the goal of making humanistic and romantic connections to ‘The Guy’. The character lives with just his sick mother and does not venture outside of his apartment. Already he disrupts the idea of normative television scheduling that privileges the rhythms of family discourses, as the temporality of the family does not factor (Needham 145). The only space which exists is the domestic space, where the progression of time is warped as there is no way to tell the days apart. ‘Helen’ ends with the character standing alone in the kitchen, the off-screen

Open Document