Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concept history of education
Concept history of education
Roles and responsibilities of school governors
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Concept history of education
Education over the past hundreds of years has made many changes and advances in the way it is run, what is included, and who is allowed to attend. The idea of a school board and what it is suppose to represent (serves) to a community has changed and has stuck to its founding principles. The power of the educational system is controlled through a network hierarchy.There are three major levels in which power is transferred through the federal, state and local levels. The local school board is a representative group of members made up of elected citizens from that district. The local school board has the power in “[hiring] personnel to operate the schools, in determining organizational and administrative policy and evaluating the results of the program and the performance of personnel.”(Ryan and Cooper [Page 354]). At the local district level a school board can range in size from nine to twelve members. There are two different ways a member can be added to the local school board by being “elected by citizens living in the school district or [being] appointed by the local government in which the school district is set” (Tozer, Senese, and Violas [Page 313]). An exception to this process is made in “some city school districts where school members are appointed by the city’s mayor.”(“Internal Structure of a School”) People who run for the position of a school board member, are usually people who have a deeply rooted personal connection to that district. They are in most cases a parent of a child who is currently attending, or has attend in the past while their child was still in school. Members chose the position because they want to be a part of the change and policy making. In an official occupation “they are state ... ... middle of paper ... ...e of a School Board.” Nyssba.org. New York State School Boards Association, n.d. Web. 19 May 2014. . SCHOOL DISTRICT OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW FACT AND FICTION “Items of Business and Discussion.” School Board Notes. 12th ed. Vol. 33. Williamsville: Williamsville Central School, 2014. 1-2. Williamsville Central Schools. Web. 20 May 2014. . “Parliamentarian.” Opertec. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 May 2014. . Ryan, Kevin, and James M. Cooper. Those Who Can Teach. 13th ed. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning, 2013. Print. Tozer, Steve, Guy Senese, and Paul C. Violas. School and Society Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Seventh ed. N.p.: McGraw Hill, 2013. Print. School and Society.
No greater obligation is placed on school officials than to protect the children in their charge from foreseeable dangers, whether those dangers arise from the careless acts or intentional transgressions of others. Although the overarching mission of a board of education is to educate, its first imperative must be to do no harm to the children in its care. A board of education must take reasonable measures to assure that the teachers and administrators who stand as surrogate parents during the day are educating, not endangering, and protecting, not exploiting, vulnerable children (Frugis v. Bracigliano, 2003).
To begin, Mary Sherry discusses the corrupt school system that lingers. In her article, we obtain insight on how schools
13th Ed. -. Jo Ray McCuen-Metherell and Anthony C. Winkler. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning, 2011. 428.
Board of Regents (1967). The teacher’s interest as a citizen in making public comment must be balanced against the State’s interest in promoting the efficiency of its employees’ public services. The court found the statements of the appellant were substantially correct, regarded matters of public concern, and presented no questions of faculty discipline or harmony. The statements offered no proper basis for the school board’s action in dismissing the appellant (Oyez, n.d.).
Vol. 5. K-M. Detroit: Cengage Learning, 2009. Print. The. 8 vols.
The constant debate over the school systems in America, have yielded a discussion over whether these school systems promote individuality through ones’ schoolwork or if the whole system is set up to conform every student. Some important issues to discuss when looking at schools causing individuality or conformity are school dress codes, rigid school schedules and classes, and little creativity promoted in schools.
By having school board meetings, it helps to see what the school’s needs. This is very important for the reason that this may be the only time that a concern parent or person voice might be heard. From this meeting, it was learned that the school board members are willing to help people that have concerns. An example, of this, was when the concern Pre-K parent was worried that she heard that Pre-K has been just a daycare. However, someone from the board mentioned to her that she would personally go with the parent the next day and show her how Pre-K is running during the day. This made the parent so happy because her concerns were being met. I have learned that school board members look out for the students and that they are the number one source that community members should go to if they have a concern or a suggestion to better their children’s
Marzano, R. J., & Brown, J. L. (2009). A handbook for the art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
The laws of the schools are to protect the students, faculty, and staff. Administrators must know the law so that everyone is treated equally and fair. With the state statutes, the school boards have the right to adopt and enforce rules and regulations necessary to operate and manage schools. Parents have to right to place their children in any institutions they feel their children will excel, whether that is a private or public school.(Essex, 2002, p. 6)
The school categories are conventional, congenial, or collegial. These three categories are distinguish by discussing the style that the principal administers the school (Glickman et al., 2010). Each individual category gives out a different outcome. A conventional administration or leadership it is recognized by the lack of communication among the staff and the administrator, also, the independence of the teachers is evident, it is no common goal it is a more individual goals setting, usually the responsible for everything are the students and teachers...
The education system has been a controversial issue among educators. Requirements of school do not let student choose what they want to study for their future. It’s a big issue to force student study specific curriculums, which don’t help them improve, and what they like to create something. Educators choose a general system for education to all students which based on general knowledge. Intelligent or genius students have to be in that system of education, which doesn’t let them improve their creativity. Educators attempt to change that system to make it better, but their changing was not that great to be an example for the world. Also, did that change qualify education system to compete other systems or not? In some examples and reasons have been made me agree with some of points from Gatto’s and Edmunson’s and disagree them.
“If it’s a school day, during school hours, one-fifth of the total American population consists of public school students K through 12. One in five Americans. And if you count teachers and administrators you are probably going to get pretty close to one-quarter of the population of the county at nay given time on a weekday sitting in a public school building.” – (School, the story of American public education)
Marzano, R.J. (2007). The art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
The meeting began when the school board members entered the large group instruction room and took their seats at a panel table angled to the side of the audience. The school board consists of nine elected members from the community. The members are as follows: Paul Ridley (President), Pat Vigliotta (Vice President), Helen Cumminskey (Secretary), Carla Manion ( Asst. Secretary), Timothy Bean (Treasurer), David Feely (Board Member), Keith Hatch (Board Member), Shane Oschman (Board Member), and Joseph Troutman (Board Member). Three members of the board were missing; however because of where the seats were located I could not see who was missing. Also, the member did not introduce themselves and left before people could address them.
Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J. & Kleiner, A. (2012). Schools that Learn (pp. 32-69). Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.