Henry’s James’s The Beast in the Jungle and Samuel Beckett 's Waiting for Godot both have a shared theme. The shared theme is that of waiting. Waiting can be described as the act of anticipating something to happen. This paper intends to explain how both books have exploited this theme and explore how the act of waiting can contribute to the current status of human beings.
In Henry’s James short story The Beast in the Jungle, we are introduced to the theme of waiting from the conversation which is held between John Marcher and May Bartram during a luncheon party. It can be learnt that Marcher revealed to May ten years ago that he has been anticipating for something strange and terrible to happen to him ever since he was a child. Ten years after
…show more content…
They meet early in the morning on the spot they met the previous day and start waiting again. The two are suffering from memory loss and they are not sure if they did the same thing the previous day. Estragon thinks Vladimir must have dreamt it all and Vladimir himself is not sure whether they spent the previous day waiting or not. Estragon is not comfortable about staying and insists on leaving but Vladimir convinces him to stay and keeping on waiting. Finally he manages to leave but he returns immediately claiming Godot is coming but Godot does not show up and so the wait …show more content…
The two think they are tied to having to wait for this mysterious man and in the process fail to see that the actually have a choice of waiting or not waiting. The result of this is lack of progress in their lives because they are stuck doing the same thing which does not bear any positive fruits in their lives. Many human beings are stuck in this circumstance. We find ourselves stuck in bad habits that only lead to stagnation in our lives because we believe we are tied to something or someone. This believes make it impossible to make positive choices that will change our lives instead we hold on to the same believe hoping and convincing ourselves that it will yield better results the next day or in the near
Both characters had grown up in “ghetto” areas not far from one another and had pretty similar backgrounds. Which created the possibility that the author (Wes Moore) could have had the same fate as his incarcerated friend. What assisted in the prevention of the switch of fates would be the fact that we all have the ability to make wise decisions and it is only up to the individual to determine what will be the next step will be.
John Marcher, the protagonist of “The Beast in the Jungle”, is about a narcissistic upper-class man who believes his life is to be defined by some unforetold event. He focuses only on himself and as a result, he neglects everything and everyone in his life. Marcher meets May Bartram, a woman who knows his secret, and instead of pursuing a romantic relationship with her, or even a genuine friendship, he uses her for his own benefit. Henry James utilizes a variety of literary devices to convey this theme in his story, such as the title, symbolism,
In ‘Waiting for Godot’, we know little concerning the protagonists, indeed from their comments they appear to know little about themselves and seem bewildered and confused as to the extent of their existence. Their situation is obscure and Vladimir and Estragon spend the day (representative of their lives) waiting for the mysterious Godot, interacting with each other with quick and short speech.
From the moment that the curtain rises, Waiting for Godot assumes an unmistakably absurdist identity. On the surface, little about the plot of the play seems to suggest that the actions seen on stage could or would ever happen. At the very least, the process of waiting hardly seems like an ideal focus of an engaging and entertaining production. Yet it is precisely for this reason that Beckett’s tale of two men, whose only discernable goal in life is to wait for a man known simply as Godot, is able to connect with the audience’s emotions so effectivel...
Sherzer, Diane. "De-construction in Waiting for Godot." The Reversible World: Symbolic Inversion in Art and Society. Ed. Barbara A. Babcock. London: Cornell University, 1978. 129-146.
Throughout the tragicomedy, the pair anxiously awaits the arrival of Godot. Vladimir and Estragon’s loyalty to Godot is evident within the first act of play. During a conversation between the two, Estragon asks Vladimir, “And if he doesn’t come?” to which Vladimir answers “We’ll come back tomorrow” and the go on to continue this dialogue: “Estragon: ‘And then the day after to-morrow.’/ Vladimir: ‘Possibly.’/ Estragon: ‘And so on.’/ Vladimir: ‘The point is—‘/ Estragon: ‘Until he comes’” (Beckett 10). In the New Testament of the Holy Bible, John 3:16 states that “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (King James Version, John, 3.16). This biblical verse is used frequently in the Christian church to represent the idea of salvation. However, the Bible never gives an exact time frame on salvation, leading Christians to wait for God’s impend...
Didi believes in a higher power and is not sure why, but his actions lead the reader to believe that he knows there is more than just a tree and a path, but there is something holding him back. Didi is waiting for God to pick him up and call him to something rather than his existentialist counterpart Estragon who wants to write his own destiny. Vladimir’s philological beliefs become evident when he asks himself if he “was sleeping while the others suffered? [and is he] sleeping now?” In the context of the play this question seems irrelevant, yet in the context of life these thoughts can be profound in meaning. Vladimir questions if he helped or hinders the morality of others was he a perpetrator of pain or a protector of peace. Among the apparent nonsense of the play there is a repetition of lines that are initiated by estragon and answered by Vladimir countless times in the play. Estragon says “Let 's go.” Vladimir replies “We can 't.” Estragon questions “Why not?” Vladimir answers “We 're waiting for Godot.” Estragon remarks an “Ah!” Vladimir appears to have the answers just as man attempts to make sense out of life, but is that the best course of actions. Should mankind be the ones in charge or should man surrender to an Invisible God or should man created their own destiny or should man attempt to adhere by the
Beckett, Samuel. Waiting For Godot. 3rd ed. N.p.: CPI Group, 2006. Print. Vol. 1 of Samuel Beckett: The Complete Dramatic Works. 4 vols
Dependency can be easily seen within Waiting for Godot as the two protagonists Vladimir and Estragon are within each other’s company throughout the play. When Estragon attempts to sleep as the duo waits for Godot, he has a nightmare and Vladimir runs to help him. In effort to comfort Estragon, who was going into hysterics, Vladimir says, “There…there…Didi is there…don’t be afraid…There…there…it’s all over…” (Beckett 79). This interaction between them expounds on Estragon’s reliance on Vladimir. Estragon has a more fragile mental physique then Vladimir and needs Vladimir’s reassurance in order to know his dream was not reality. On the other hand, Vladimir would have a sunny disposition without Estragon, as Estragon is the friend he relies on for his own mental health as Estragon is the anchor that holds Vladimir to society and life. The two often quarrel in verbal exchanges howeve...
The theme of futility is further reflected in the cyclical nature of the dialogue in the sense that nothing appears to change and everything is simply repeated, their conversation never reached a definitive conclusion they are ultimately still ‘waiting for Godot’ and longing for answers. The concept of time is used very successfully by Beckett in order to highlight and develop the theme of futility in ‘Waiting for Godot.’ Time can be seen as a very fluid concept in the sense that the audience is never made aware of how l...
Once again Vladimir asks Estragon and Estragon forgets. Vladimir also notices that the tree has blossomed overnight. Vladimir is the only one to notice anything different from the day before. Vladimir is the only one with some memory, probably why they wait for Godot every day. Everyday Godot never shows up, so the constant cycle continues. It is the most useless cycle, but they still have a little hope. That one day Godot shows up and saves them. So Vladimir waits for Godot for as long as he can, but has no idea how long he has waited because he does not understand
Literary masterpieces are a reflection of society that helps educate by using spiritual, intellectual, and political themes. According to Woolf (2014), “…masterpieces are not single and solitary births; they are the outcome of many years of thinking in common, of thinking by the body of the people, so that the experience of the mass is behind the single voice” (para. 12). This paper will explore the powerful literary masterpieces from different cultures where their lessons are still relevant today. The characters and their interactions make the story entertaining, while the lesson to be learned from the characters makes it a masterpiece. Societies come and go, but the lessons from these stories never change. The purpose of this paper is to define what a masterpiece is, how it reflects on society, the qualities it contains, and how they are still relevant today.
The theme of the play Waiting for Godot is better interpreted after considering the background of the time it was written. Beckett reflected the prevailing mindset and conditions of the people living after World War II into this story of Vladimir and Estragon, both waiting hopelessly for a mysterious 'Godot', who seems to hold their future and their life in his hands. Beckett himself was...
“Nothing to be done” is a repetitive theme of the play, Waiting for Godot. In fact, nothingness and futility of character’s lives is shown in the form of the play. The fou...
Although Samuel Beckett's tragicomedy, Waiting for Godot, has no definite meaning or interpretation, the play acts as a statement of hopelessness regarding human existence. Debate surrounds the play because, due to its simplicity, almost any interpretation is valid. The main characters, Vladimir and Estragon, are aging men who must wait for a person, being, or object named Godot, but this entity never appears to grace the men with this presence. Both characters essentially demonstrate how one must go through life when hope is nonexistent as they pointlessly attempt to entertain themselves with glum conversation in front of a solitary tree. The Theater of the Absurd, a prevalent movement associated with Waiting for Godot, serves as the basis for the message of hopelessness in his main characters. Samuel Beckett's iconic Waiting for Godot and his perception of the characteristics and influence of the Theater of the Absurd illustrate the pointlessness and hopelessness regarding existence. In the play, boredom is mistaken for hopelessness because the men have nothing to do, as they attempt to occupy themselves as, for some reason, they need to wait for Godot. No hope is present throughout the two-act play with little for Estragon and Vladimir to occupy their time while they, as the title indicates, wait for Godot.