Healing and Biomedical Practices within Communities

919 Words2 Pages

Medical anthropologists have sought to understand and critique the similarities and differences between the social and cultural authority held by folk healing and biomedical practices. The understanding and critique come from the desire to learn more about relationships between a sick person and a healer/doctor. This relationship is a crucial piece in analyzing how social authority, which “involves the control of action through giving of commands” (Joralemon 2010:69), and cultural authority, which “entails the construction of reality through definitions of fact and value” (Joralemon 2010:69) are formed, used and sustained within a medical community. In both folk healing and biomedical practices, as Joralemon states, “the ability to cure would support a healer’s claims to superiority over others and could be used to promote professionalization” (2010:70). He says that when a doctor or healer is correct in their diagnosis and the patient gets better, doctors and healers gain more power and prestige within the community, which leads to a greater authority. The job of a medical anthropologist is to observe and analyze how these relationships function within different medical/healing practices around the world in different communities. When medical anthropologists examine folk healing practices, they observe how the healing practices used by the healer demonstrate their social and cultural authority, and they often question the authority because there is no method to quantify the results of the success or failure of the healing practice in the traditional scientific ways that biomedicine has. It is also difficult to quantify because the practices themselves vary within different cultural contexts of the community and each has their ... ... middle of paper ... ...by the budgets for public health measures that establish sanitation systems or distributing chlorine tablets for water. Both the folk healing and biomedical practices strive to help heal patients, improve lives and end suffering. Each practice has developed and utilizes its own traditions and specific methods to serve its community. They are strongly similar as they both rely on the authority of the healer/doctor to heal patients. However, they do differ widely in procedure and in developing social and cultural authority. In studying and analyzing the differences, medical anthropologists are able to develop preventative systems and identify solutions to epidemic outbreaks that best fit within the cultural context of different communities. Programs and resources that are complementary to the traditions and cultures of communities served have proven more effective.

Open Document