Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of leaders in a society
The role of leaders in the society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Often, people come to power through selfish actions such as Claudius from the play Hamlet (Shakespeare). However, this was not the case with Hazel the rabbit. He lived in an environment that probably was intended to be a portrayal of human society. In the novel Watership Down, the peaceful life of a rabbit warren was suddenly disturbed by the horrifying dream that a lowly rabbit Fiver had. Hazel was worried by it and took action by contacting the warren’s chief rabbit, Threarah. He went to the authorities first to solve the problem. That was not the attitude one would expect of an independent thinker such as Hazel. He was not greedy of the leadership position as humans such as Claudius who killed to become a king. Only when he realized Threarah would not help him, did Hazel initiate the mass exodus of rabbits.
There were various reasons for Hazel to take leadership of rabbits. Some of those motives could lead the reader to doubt the rabbit’s actual intention was to save the warren instead of his own life when he led them off. It is clear Hazel would have had a hard time safely traveling after leaving the warren with just Fiver and himself. Those potentially selfish reasons may have been his motivation at first. But as the plot develops, it becomes clear that Hazel is willing to sacrifice himself if he needs to so that they may continue living. He also might have desired to establish a warren that treated all rabbits with respect. Earlier on, two large rabbits from the owsla had stolen a choice morsel of food from him and his younger brother. Maybe he was actually motivated by a vision for a fairer environment in which rabbits could live. Later, it was shown that he respected his followers’ opinions at Watership Down and turne...
... middle of paper ...
...ry while the evil Claudius had very little qualities to start with that could possibly better his citizens. When Hazel had knowledge learned of the potential impending catastrophe, he was intelligent and able to think independently of others, including his chief. Watership Down would have been a tale of a massacre had its author Richard Adams decided not to make Hazel decided to set out on his own against Thereah’s advice. It was Hazel’s balanced yet independent thinking that made him the ideal leader.
Works Cited
Adams, Richard. Watership Down: a Novel. New York: Scribner, 1972.
Gerth, Ben. 1998. www.graphics.stanford.edu. 10 3 2011 .
ProQuest CSA . "A Sense of Community in Richard Adams' Watership Down." SIRS Renaissance (2008).
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.
After the group comes across a river, Hazel and Fiver discuss if crossing the river is necessary, and how they were going to persuade the others into crossing. “‘Well, let’s go and talk to the others… It’s crossing they’re not going to fancy…’” (34). Crossing the river was their first physical challenge, as they had to figure out how to get everyone across safely, as Pipkin was injured and Fiver is one of the smaller rabbits. Furthermore, another problem was the other rabbits’ trust in Fiver’s intuition, and whether or not they were going to listen to him. In their old habitat, they most likely would have never had to cross a river, especially one that is as strong as this one, however they are left with no choice but to cross when Fiver stresses the importance to cross the river, per his intuition. The entry into the forest is a metaphor for the entry into the world of adventure. Although the assemblage had problems all along the way, they really only began after leaving the warren, the territory in which they’ve already explored, and entered the forest, the unfamiliar and
Updike, John. "A & P." The Bedford Introduction to Literature. 2nd Edition. Ed. Michael Meyer. Boston: St. Martin's Press, 1990. 407-411.
One important skill that a leader should have is risk, which Hazel and Lewis both experienced. Hazel and Lewis each took their followers into lands that were unfamiliar to them. Neither of them knew what they were going to encounter, but had they not taken a chance, they never would have found what they were looking for. Hazel had to jeopardize his life for the future of his rabbits when he tried to free the rabbits of Nuthanger Farm, when he lured the dog away from the farm so that it would attack General Woundwort, and many other times. Lewis gambled his life and the lives of his crew for the United States when he explored western North America. The explorers experienced not only bad weather but also attacks from Indians. Although taking these risks was very dangerous, had they not be taken western North America may have never been discovered, and all of the rabbits on Watership Down would have died at Sandleford.
"Oh Hazel! This is where it comes from! I know now—something very bad! Some terrible thing—coming closer and closer" (Adams, 1975, p. 21). This quote at the beginning of Watership Down is the first of Fiver's amazing forewarnings, that helps him to demonstrate both of the themes of "trust" and "survival" in the rabbit world. Trust and survival are two key components to the rabbits lives, and they cannot live without either. Because of his ability to sense danger around him, Fiver exemplifies the related themes of trust and survival in Watership Down.
Connections can be made between the deteriorating state of the kingdom, or people, of Denmark, and Claudius’ leadership. There are multiple references made about the decaying strength and reputation of Denmark throughout the play, as the audience can see how the actions of one individual causes a snowballing effect of bad endings throughout the kingdom (and more specifically, for the characters in the play). The new king, Claudius’, poor leadership and rotten nature (which then functions like a poison or disease) brings misfortune to Denmark as a
From the first day that Hazel and Augustus encountered, the two are practically inseparable. The basis of their relationship ended up being Hazel's beloved book, An Imperial Affliction. She required Augustus to read it and in return, he required her to read the book that was the basis of his favorite game. Hazel related to the character in the book, Anna, because she had a rare blood cancer malignancy. Augustus and Hazel bonded within the book because both of them had a burning desire to determine how the story ended, because the author stopped the book before providing the conclusion on what happened to every one of the characters.
Updike, John. “A & P.” The Norton Introduction to Literature. Eds. Alison Booth and Kelly
Hazel who is Fiver's slightly larger brother leads the pack of rabbits into a field where he believes they can live. When they get there they find out that there is already a group of rabbits living there but they let the travelers stay with them. Fiver being the smart one again warns them not to join the new warren, but once again no one listens to them again. Discovering they need more female rabbits to mate with. Two of the survivors at the warren tell of the horrible poisoning occurring out there. The overall conception of the matter is still kind of not understood totally by the rest of the crew.
In Hamlet, Shakespeare developed a character, an antagonist, which produces twists and turns throughout the play. Even though in the beginning of the play, Claudius seemed to be an intelligent man, who has excellent speaking skills that helped him take the leadership of his deceased brother’s kingdom, and marry his wife. But, combining both his intelligence and excellent speaking skills, shows Claudius’s true nature: an astute, lustful conspirator. Through the different settings and situations, Claudius’s character contributes to the overall understanding of the play through psychological, biblical and philosophical methods.
2nd ed. of the book. New York: St. James Press, 1995. Literature Resource Center -. Web.
Home is what the rabbits were looking for throughout the whole book making it an important plot point in many ways. Leadership connects to hoe in this story because even when the leaders could not find home they tried to make one for the other rabbits. When Woundwort was attacking the new warren Bigwig took change and made everyone else safe before he thought of him self, this decision could have been terrible for Bigwig but because of his leadership skills he steps forward. Nature connects to home because nature is home for these rabbits. One of the most important things to them is to have a natural and safe life witch they can only have with a handmade warren or home. Nature also can be scary for rabbits and make them need and want a home. Although they are three separate themes all three give the story the proper storyline to be a properly plotted out story. Without these themes the story would have no body or any interesting
Ambition can consume leaders, nonetheless some leaders can handle the pressure that comes with having to lead individuals like Abraham Lincoln. However some leaders like Adolf Hitler and Macbeth allowed their ambition to get the best of them and cause harm. Hitler allowed his ambition to drive him to make catastrophic decisions such as trying to conquer other (stronger) countries, make dangerous weapons, torturer, and kill millions of innocent people. Whereas Macbeth allowed his ambition to kill the people that loved and supported him the most in order to gain control of the kingdom. Both Macbeth and Hitler illustrate leadership, but turned mad in order to consume more power.
...ns his messengers they had “no further personal power to business with the King” than his articles allowed (1.2). This limitation reveals Claudius’ rigid authoritativeness. Thus, Claudius’ flamboyant use of language and his diplomatic foreign policy reveal his strong leadership qualities.
Delving into the character of King Claudius in Shakespeare’s tragedy, Hamlet, we find a character who is not totally evil but rather a blend of morally good and bad elements. Let’s explore the various dimensions of this many-sided character.
King Claudius, as illustrated in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, displays both charm and eloquence. Claudius is an intelligent person and is able to deceive people into believing he is innocent and morally guided. He is adept at manipulating people in order to advance and maintain his own power and fails to show any remorse for his actions. Claudius utilizes his linguistic skills to portray himself as an innocent and prudent leader; however, upon further inspection his diction is a mere smoke screen that hides his manipulative and cunning nature.