Habermas's Notion of the Colonization of the Life-world

1043 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Sociology mid term

Habermas presented his theories of colonization of the life-world based on classic theorists, including such sociologists as Weber, Durkheim, Parsons, and Mead and Marx. At the heart of his theories was communication. Habermas believed the main problem with society was not how to control it but how to maintain communicative action, believing that societies have become increasingly impaired or “colonized”. Habermas called this the “colonization of life-world by systems”. The first part of Habermas’s theory is concerned with how the crisis of communicative action has become colonized and its illegitimacy (Frank, 2000). The second part of his theory describes the way to restore legitimacy, holding that a fully functioning democracy, honoring the rights of citizens and reasoned communication, remained society’s best chance (Sociological Theory | Chapter 15 Chapter Summary, 2004). The crisis of society, which Habermas called the colonization of life-world explained a stable society where communication takes place within four spheres represented by A, L, G and I. He defined them as such, Adaptation depended on the availability of money; L was value-commitments; Goal attainment (majority vote); and I was influence. A & L represented the “private sphere” and G & I the “public sphere”. Society required mutual exchange as well as boundaries between them. G & A also represented the material reproduction of society. Alternately, I & L represented the life-world (Frank, 2000). These spheres can also be described as quantitative and qualitative media. In his observation about quantitative and qualitative media, he states the differences between the two. A & G are both quantitative: money and power in numbers can be counted, and whoever ha... ... middle of paper ... ...live influence and value-commitments which are the priorities of individuals in society (Frank, 2000). Works Cited Gelderblom, D. (2011). Sociological Theory Study Guide 2, Chapter 3: Anthony Giddens. Retrieved January 14, 2012, from http://myedison.tesc.edu/tescdocs/Web_Courses/SOC-417 OL/Study_Guide_8e/Study_Guide_2_417_8e.pdf Miller, S. (2007, January 4). Social Institutions (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved January 14, 2012, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-institutions/#AgeStr Ritzer, G. (2011). 10. Sociological theory (8th ed., p. 351-390). New York: McGraw- Hill. Sociological Theory | Chapter 15 Chapter Summary. (2004). Agency-Structure Integration. Retrieved January 14, 2012, from http://highered.mcgraw- hill.com/sites/0072817186/student_view0/chapter15/chapter_summary.html

Show More
Related

  • Comparing Hobbes and Rousseau: Views on State Nature and Social Contract

    1165 Words  | 3 Pages

    ​It was instructed to compare and contrast two of the authors from BF190 discussed throughout this course to a media object provided by the professor. The authors I chose to focus on are Thomas Hobbes and Jean Jacques Rousseau. From the readings “Leviathan” by Thomas Hobbes (CITE) and “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” by Jean Jacques Rousseau (CITE), both authors have similar but yet very different viewpoints on ideas they have made. The ideas I will be comparing and contrasting between these two philosophers are their different beliefs and understandings on the State of nature and the Social contract. The media objective I have chosen to focus the ideas on is Outsourcing a Refugee Crisis: U.S. Paid Mexico Millions to Target Central Americans Fleeing Violence. Throughout this essay, I will Exhibit my

    Read More

  • Individualism And Collectivism And In Love's Labor By Eva Kittay

    1698 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kittay’s work detailing the dependency relationship explains that human rely on each other; Aristotle’s work conveys that human forms household for economical interest; and Marx’s work implied that humans are eventually one classless society with best economical benefits for all. Whether or not being members in community is the best way to live for every human is still debatable, but it is the only choice that humans all made by

    Read More

  • Sociologicalization Of The Public Sphere

    903 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lenox and Lenox, the public sphere can be seen as “a domain of our social life in which such a

    Read More

  • Asimov's Foundation

    656 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this, we find the first commentary, which in fact mirrors history. Here we see that a society, as occurred with the Roman Empire, can grow only up to a certain point, after which it begins declining and decaying, due in part to the gross levels of comfort that its populace become used to. This reliance upon comfort leads to an eventual loss of civic virtue among the people of the society. Once virtue is lost, the moral framework which holds a society together begins to fail, and after a time, crumbles, leading to a collapse of the society itself.

    Read More

  • wk 7

    665 Words  | 2 Pages

    Akin, J. (2005, March 1). Mass Media | Beyond Intractability. Mass Media | Beyond Intractability. Retrieved April 25, 2014, from http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/mass-communication

    Read More

  • Force, Morality and Rights in Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's Social Contract Theories

    1630 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his famous writing, “The Leviathan”, Thomas Hobbes explains that the natural condition of mankind is when a society lives together without the rule of a common authority or power; this creates a “dog-eat-dog” world in which the citizens live in a perpetual state of utter chaos and fear. The fears experienced by the citizens are not only of the unequal distribution of the power of others, but also fear of the loss of their own power. In Hobbes’ state of nature there is complete liberty for society in the idea that each member may do whatever he or she pleases without having to worry about infringing upon the rights of the rest of society; in other words, one is allowed to do whatever necessary to pursue their own happiness. Ho...

    Read More

  • The Expulsion of Freedom

    1396 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Jean Jacques Rousseau, human beings are bestowed with the blessings of freedom during their individual genesis on this fruitful planet, but this natural freedom is immensely circumscribed as it’s exchanged for the civil liberties of the State. He indicated that the supplanting of natural freedom is necessary for the obtainment of greater power for the greater collective community, but the prospect of obtaining superlative capabilities comes with the price of constraints. Yet this notion of natural freedom conflicts with Thomas Hobbes rendition on the state of nature because he illustrates that nature, interface through savagery. According to Hobbes, mankind has endorsed and embraced natures temperament, because this system of truculency and servility that nature orbits adversely affects the nature of mankind, resulting in mankinds affinity for greed, and brutal ambition. Inspite of their conflicting perspectives on the state of nature, both support and explicate on the idea that the preservation and proliferation of mankind as a whole is best achieved through their belief, and withholding the policies of a social contract. The intention of Leviathan is to create this perfect government, which people eagerly aspires to become apart of, at the behest of individual relinquishing their born rights. This commonwealth, the aggregation of people for the purposes of preventing unrest and war, is predicated upon laws that prohibit injustice through the implementation of punishment. Essentially in the mind of both Rousseau and Hobbes, constraints are necessary for human beings to be truly free under the covenants and contracts applied to the civil state at which mankind interface through.

    Read More

  • Making And Remaking On City Road

    750 Words  | 2 Pages

    ‘Society makes and remakes people, but society is also made and remade by the multiple connections and disconnections between people, and between people, places and things’ (Havard, 2014, p.67).

    Read More

  • Michel Foucault: Power and Identity

    1988 Words  | 4 Pages

    Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman’s work was centralised around there two different concepts of how your identity is formed through the process of power and expert knowledge. This Essay will discuss the ideas of Michel Foucault who was a French Social Theorist. His theories addressed the relationship between power and knowledge and how both of these are used as a form of social control through society. The essay will look at Foucault’s work in The Body and Sexuality, Madness and Civilisation and Discipline and Punish which displays how he conceptualised Power and identity on a Marxist and macro basis of study. The Essay will also address the Ideas of Erving Goffman who was A Canadian Born Sociologist who’s key study was what he termed as interactional order, that is how the functions of ritual and order of every individual member of society, in everyday life, interact to form social order. He suggested the metaphor of the stage, where people play roles in specific everyday situations using trust and tact, the control of bodily gestures, face and gaze and the use of language to set the parameters of their social interactions. People individually participate in these rules of conduct to produce social order Looking at Goffmans work of the Presentation of One Self in Everyday life, Stigma and Asylums t Goffman argues that it is these interactions, or the interactional order that constructs society. This Essay looks to give an Insight of how Foucault and Goffman Compare and contrast in their theories to give an understanding of how the exertion of power and expert knowledge constructs individuals Identities.

    Read More

  • Comparing Foucault's 'Truth And Juridical Forms'

    2238 Words  | 5 Pages

    First, institutions control nearly all of the individual’s time. Second, institutions control the individual’s body. (Foucault, “Truth and Juridical Forms” 79-81) As such, “the operation of these institutions implied a general discipline of existence that went far beyond their seemingly precise ends” (Foucault, “Truth and Juridical Forms” 81). Institutions control the entire livelihood of the individual such that his time and body may be transformed into productive labor time and labor power. For example, in school, the individual does not only learn arithmetic and other like subjects, but also the correct, most efficient way to accomplish such.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan and John Locke's Second Treatise of Government

    3013 Words  | 7 Pages

    Hobbes’ Leviathan and Locke’s Second Treatise of Government comprise critical works in the lexicon of political science theory. Both works expound on the origins and purpose of civil society and government. Hobbes’ and Locke’s writings center on the definition of the “state of nature” and the best means by which a society develops a systemic format from this beginning. The authors hold opposing views as to how man fits into the state of nature and the means by which a government should be formed and what type of government constitutes the best. This difference arises from different conceptions about human nature and “the state of nature”, a condition in which the human race finds itself prior to uniting into civil society. Hobbes’ Leviathan goes on to propose a system of power that rests with an absolute or omnipotent sovereign, while Locke, in his Treatise, provides for a government responsible to its citizenry with limitations on the ruler’s powers.

    Read More

  • Social Change Marshall McLuhan versus David Riesman

    1168 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marshall McLuhan is best known for coining the phrase “The Medium is the message”. He believed that society today is centred around electronic media. On the other hand David Riesman who’s most famous book is entitled “Lonely Crowd” centred his research around characteristics of American society. What these two men have in common is that they both believed that society could be separated into three distinct phases. Riesman believed that there were three distinct character types, tradition-directed, inner-directed and other-directed. While McLuhan believed that there were three types of society which he called oral societies, written societies and electronic societies. Riesman believed the inquiries into the relationship between social structure and social character. The question central to Riesman was what type of person was being formed in the emerging capitalist societies in the developed nations. McLuhan was theorist of literature whose ideas about media and global culture stimulated discussion among social the...

    Read More

  • Sociological Imagination vs. Common Sense

    1814 Words  | 4 Pages

    Mills(1959), also wrote about public issues of social structure, referring to matters that go beyond the individual and look at society as a whole. How society is organised and how society works. This goes far beyond ‘the troubles of milieu, as it doesn’t look at the person and there individual experiences in society but looks at the wider social structure e.g social institutions… education, religion, family, law and how they have developed and interact with each other examples of the differenc...

    Read More

  • Communitarianism

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ghts are often overly individualistic, and conduce to a picture of the individual as a kind of atom-autonomous, self-sufficient and essentially separate from everyone else. Secondly, although the acquisition of individual rights and freedoms historically is wholly admirable-it has ruled out barbaric practices like torture, the withholding of property rights from women, etc. Thirdly, a wholly undesirable and unintended upshot of a society which emphasizes too much rights and too little duty. Communitarians believe that ‘rights culture’ has now gone too far, to the extent that the emphasis on rights has squeezed out any emphasis on duty and judging by the most outcomes of present day, one has to agree with this. However, communitarians differ as to their interpretation of the value of community, and their criteria for the relation of community. (Browning et al., 2000)

    Read More

  • The Components of a Society

    951 Words  | 2 Pages

    Friedman begins his book by creating a boundary line between two organizations who are opposed to each other. By the concept of ‘Society’, he basically talks about the government and the people who live according to the rules made by that government. He continues b...

    Read More

More about Habermas's Notion of the Colonization of the Life-world

Open Document