The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

946 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gun control does not reduce crime study

Gun control yes or no “If guns kill people; then pencils misspell words, cars make people drive drunk and spoons made Rosie O’Donnell fat.” (Anonymous) The author is saying that if guns kill people then that is giving a lifeless object a mind of its own, giving it the ability to harm without it having to have a brain to make the decision. Gun control is a major issue right now, some believe that the United States needs to have more laws created and passed restricting who can have guns and when they can be used. On the other hand, this topic infuriates many. More gun laws will not make us any safer if anything getting rid of guns will only make people unhappy and bring more trouble.
No more gun laws should be made! People always say that guns
While in the US only 9,146 gun related accidents happened. In the United States, there are 63,709 legal gun stores around the country. While in Mexico there is only one legal gun store in the country, located on a military base. It makes it almost impossible for one to get a gun. To buy a gun, at the one legal store, one has to go through a series of test. One has to show that they obtain a constant income, provide personal references, pass a criminal background check, and prove that any military duties that they were involved in where completed with honor. Yet, Mexico has more gun homicides that the United States. If the gun laws in Mexico didn’t help lower the homicides, and they have one store, how will more laws in the US help anything considering we have 63,709 gun stores? More laws won’t help with anything, if they do do something they will bring more troubles and problems. Gun laws in Mexico didn’t work, gun laws in the United States won work either. People want to fully get rid of guns because they are weapons, but what about knives. People get killed by knives so are they going to ban them as well. Think back to 9/11 when the planes were crashed into buildings, the planes were used as weapons. Let’s get rid of planes. Even credit cards could become a weapon. If guns are banned everything that has a possibility of becoming a weapon should be banned as well. What about

Show More
Related

  • Why Gun Control Is Not Enough Analysis

    670 Words  | 2 Pages

    McMahan backs up his premises by showing that in other “Western Countries, per capita homicide rates, as well as rates of violent crime involving guns, are a fraction of what they are in the United States.” (McMahan, 4) After reading this statement, we are to assume that those countries have more gun regulations, and ultimately our limited gun regulations and access to firearms are what is driving so much violence within our country. Gun advocates deny this claim,

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, enabling stricter gun control laws will help to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill, criminals, and children and teens. With these laws put into place there will be more assurance of the safety of American citizens. It is not necessary to strip citizens of their right to own a gun, but we should be able to make it harder to get guns. If you are someone with a clear record and using a gun for recreation use, you will have no trouble obtaining a gun. In the long run increase the laws on gun control hurts nobody. Despite historic events where governments seized firearms and killed millions of citizens, today we have a different problem, which is making sure guns are in the right hands.

    Read More

  • Should the Government Implement Gun Control?

    1316 Words  | 3 Pages

    When it comes to violence, the stricter gun laws will only help the criminals hurt more innocent people. I believe this is because during the Prohibition years in the United States people were still able to find alcohol and the government could not do anything about it. Drugs have become a huge problem and the government still has yet to find a way to stop all drugs from reaching consumers. This exact same thing will happen with guns. There is no stopping supply and demand and if a criminal wants a gun, they are going to find it.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Will NOT Stop Senseless Gun Violence

    1542 Words  | 4 Pages

    Gun violence in the United States is higher than ever, and criminals with guns will “…kill as many as 1000 people each day” (Alpers&Wilson). Taking this into perspective, it is only right to fight fire with fire or, in this case, use a gun to protect yourself and those around you. Gun control does not only decrease the ability for protection, it also decreases our rights as U.S citizens. The constitution clearly states that we are given the right to bear arms, meaning we may carry fire arms. Even if we have stricter laws for guns, it will not stop killers from shooting innocent people. These men and women causing damage to the lives of numerous individuals do not care if there is a law banning guns, because all they truly want to do is hurt others. The pain citizens endure every day from losing a family member, friend, or even just a colleague is repulsive. These permanent deaths continue to make people fearful and it causes damage in their lives; unless something is done. Most people agree that action needs to be taken to stop this inhumane cruelty, but the question is; what can be done? Americans need protection, rights, and power to break this inexcusable gun violence circling America. Gun restrictions for trustworthy and reliable gun owners have not been proven to weaken gun violence in the United States; therefore, gun control should be limited because it is only hurting America, not helping it.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

    898 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Gerney, Parsons, and Posner (2013), in the wake of mass shootings and other types of gun-related disasters, an increase in interest among the public, community leaders, and elected officials occurs, with regards to identifying effective means through which to minimize the possibility for recurrence of such incidences. Some of the reactions at such times include the enactment of more strict gun control laws to limit the accessibly of firearms to individuals with the criminal intent of committing a gun-related crime.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

    1594 Words  | 4 Pages

    For many years, America has witnessed mass shootings within it’s borders. In 2015 alone, there were 372 mass shootings (Oldham). The question most Americans are faced with is: do we need more gun control or is gun control the problem? With more gun control, it can be made mandatory that protective devices are used on firearms to prevent accidental harm. Gun control creates mandatory laws such as the requirement for an individual to pass a background check before he/she is permitted to purchase a firearm. Gun control has also been proven to prevent suicides due to the increased difficulty of obtaining a firearm. Those who believe that gun control is the problem claim that by removing one 's firearms, you are endangering them to threats that

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control In America

    1337 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the last 20 years mass shootings have become more common. More and more people are becoming concerned with guns, and the fact they are being used for killing innocent people. Over the past year we’ve had shootings in Orlando, Dallas, and multiple other cities. Many people have come to the conclusion that guns need to go. Others believe there should be background checks for every person who would like to purchase a firearm. Federal laws already prohibit some people from being able to purchase a weapon. The list includes convicted felons, immigrants without legal status, and people diagnosed with certain types of mental illness (“The Fight over Guns,” 2016). Guns should be a ton harder to buy than they are at the

    Read More

  • Gun Control: The Right To Self Control

    1850 Words  | 4 Pages

    Justin King once stated that “The UK enacted its handgun ban in 1996. From 1990 until the ban was enacted, the homicide rate fluctuated between 10.9 and 13 homicides per million. After the ban was enacted, homicides trended up until they reached a peak of 18.0 in 2003. Since 2003, which incidentally was about the time the British government flooded the country with 20,000 more cops, the homicide rate has fallen to 11.1 in 2010. In other words, the 15-year experiment in a handgun ban has achieved absolutely nothing”. The United Kingdom tried a 15 year ban of guns and all it did was increase the rate of crimes. From 1990 until the ban was put into work the homicide rate went from 10.9 to 13 per million. After the ban was there for a while the homicides reached to 18.0 in 2003. In the same year the UK flooded the country with over 20,00 cops so the homicide rates would decrease. John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, gun rights activist, once said that "The problem with such [gun control] laws is that they take away guns from law-abiding citizens, while would-be criminals ignore them”. While the country takes its time to check and take away every gun that is legal and ignore the fact that just like there are legal guns there are illegal guns as well. Taking away the legal gun would be like unarming everyone to be useless when the time to defend themselves comes.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Violence

    2058 Words  | 5 Pages

    Violence in the United States is a major problem, but our politicians only want to focus on gun violence, and some of them believe the solution to ending gun violence is by preventing law abiding citizens from exercising their second amendment rights. Guns are easier to commit a crime with than other weapons, or without a weapon at all, but with an estimated 270 million guns the hands of citizens (11 facts), if they were the problem we would know it by now. It is undeniable that guns are responsible for a high amount of crime, but we already have tens of thousands of gun laws in the United States (How many gun laws are there?), that haven’t been able to curb gun violence. If the current laws were working, then maybe there would be a reasonable

    Read More

  • Gun Control And Gun Violence

    1569 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...he gun debate in America, has many people talking about how dangerous guns could be. Trying to avoid people to buy guns or eliminate guns would not help because guns could be brought illegally. Background checks would only work if the government makes the law stricter but since is not yet strict, then things will still remain the same. Instead, of making more laws, the government should let people carry guns with them because the gun could be used for protection. There could have been a possibility that in the San Bernardino shooting, the 14 individuals who died in the attack, could have survived if those individuals had a gun. Who knows where and when a shooting could happen? No one knows but the one who will commit the crime. That is why having more guns could reduce individuals to get injured or die in a shooting. Which means that more guns will equal more safety.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

    1481 Words  | 3 Pages

    Groups for stricter gun control,such as Handgun Control Inc. (HCI), argue that guns do kill people. They think that it is the gun that makes people feel they are in the right and have the power to take someone 's life and control a situation (Kriegel 818). In reality, one cannot place the blame on the gun. Guns aren 't animate objects that can pick their victims. Guns require people to pull the trigger. For this reason it is my belief that the emphasis of gun control should be placed on teaching gun safety and keeping the criminals from getting their hands on firearms.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

    448 Words  | 1 Pages

    Why do guns have a control law when there are other weapons just as dangerous in the kitchens of many homes, like a knife. In order for a knife to be able to kill someone, they need to be in the hands of a person who is willing to kill someone, just like a gun. How can someone defend themselves against a person with a gun. It’s simple, they can’t. They’ll end up seriously injured or might even die. There is just simply not enough guns in the country. It’s scary how people, including me, who can’t get a gun have to run, hide, or try to defend ourselves with hand-held weapons. The Europeans annihilated the American Indians with their guns because the Americans Indians’ weapons were no match to guns. This proven fact shows the power of a gun. People should have an equal

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

    257 Words  | 1 Pages

    I am an avid gun owner and supporter of the second amendment, as most of my community is. I take a firm stance against gun control. Of course I always kept my guns secured when my children were young, but as they grew older, I taught them how to use and have a healthy respect for firearms. Once they became teenagers and could handle a gun safely, I began keeping a gun and ammunition accessible so they could retrieve it in my absence, in case they needed to use it for self-defense. At least I did until I began my research. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), in 2015 suicide was the second leading cause of death for ages 15 to 24 (“Injury Prevention” 1). The CDC also reports firearms are utilized as the method for suicide in 45%

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

    1208 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gun control in general has been and still is a controversial issue in our world today. People see violence from gun usage on the news, in their neighborhoods and unfortunately sometimes they are the victims of it. Although these things are true and that violent crime does in fact involve the use or firearms, it is the people that use them to harm other people. Guns don’t kill people; People kill people.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: All Handguns MUST Be Banned

    348 Words  | 1 Pages

    The lawmakers of today make laws and they don’t think about the decisions they make from both perspectives. They may say it’s all right to own a handgun but they may have different intentions than the user has on how and why they need one. The owner may need one for their protection but the lawmaker may think it’s for hunting or something other than it causing violence. To ensure these guns are not being used for violence the law needs to make a set of rules and regulations on the conditions of guns. How to use them/abuse them need to be the number one law. It should state guns are not intended to be used for violence of no kind. The law need to enforce the laws they make to ensure proper safety it would eliminate half of the gun violence.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Open Document