The United States is undergoing an issue of gun control and violent crimes due to all the firearms available in America. Some people have the opinion that gun control should be even stricter and the government should take away all firearms from American citizens, while others think that citizens should be allowed to own or purchase a gun if that person meets the requirements. Laws are different for each state, and most of the states protect our right to bear arms. I know a lot of people in America own one or more gun, there are “88.8 guns per 100 people” (ProCon). A lot of people in Kentucky own guns, which might be a stereo type that people hear, but in my experience it is true. I live in a county where guns are pretty much everywhere, not …show more content…
This major point is wrong because gun laws do not mean discrimination. There are certain people that do not meet the requirements to buy a gun, which does not mean that they are in a different category from the rest of the American citizens. Not being allowed to purchase a gun because of certain criteria probably has a reasonable explanation. Guns are used for more than just random violent acts, some people like to hunt for sport. A Pew survey found that “57% of people believe that owning a gun protects them from being victimized” (Growing Public Support for Gun Rights). That shows people use guns as a sense of protection. Taking away all the guns will not fix the problem. In one part of the article she makes a good point about how we will never know if a person will commit a violent act or not, but with that point she uses no evidence to back up her claim. By not using any evidence she makes it seem unimportant when it should be one of her main points to argue. It would help her if she did put some kind of support instead of her sarcastic tone. In my opinion banning guns will only make matters worse. It might make gun deaths decline, but if guns are illegal there will be even more people breaking the law to have guns. There is no way that some people will give up their firearms, it would start a huge riot trying to tell American citizens that they have to get rid of a gun already bought. In the twentieth century gun ownership doubled and the murder rate decreased (Sowell). Bovy could have backed up her claim by saying the states with the most gun laws have less gun deaths and then give some evidence and statistics, but she didn’t. So I am able to refute and put my evidence. Strict gun laws do not affect murder rates as significantly as some would think. A 2013 study found that, “between 1980 and 2009 states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had
Gun control is one of the most controversial and one of the most talked about topics in the U.S. Some believe that if guns are taken away that there will be less violence and that the death rate may even go down. While others believe that they have a right to bare arms like it states in the constitution. One of the most talked about reasons on why gun control should be stricter is the obvious: guns are not safe. But what people don’t understand is that everytime a gun is purchased a criminal background check is done right away. What people are unaware if is that the majority of people who purchase guns have already bought one in the past. Another talked about issue is the Right to Bear Arms. The Right to Bear arms has been in the constitution for decades. The constitution is not just something you can edit and re-write everytime you see a problem with it or think its “outdated”
The debate over firearms has been polarized for too long. Gun law is a never-ending issue because there hardly is any true debate. Americans (and even gun owners) do support the governments efforts to make sure guns are less dangerous in violent hands, but that is the main problem-the guns getting in the wrong human hands. Millions of law-abiding Americans do own and do enjoy their guns. But criminals and sometimes-disconcerted kids often use firearms to kill. The use of firearms has increased tremendously. An average day in Los Angeles is four people dying in a gun related crime and the United States faces approximately 87 deaths a day. There are more than 200 million guns in circulation in the United States and if you don’t own a firearm, chances are that your neighbor or friend does (Fineman 27). Sure, the Founding Fathers incorporated the Second Amendment as “the right to keep and bear arms,” but it did not give the distinction of using guns to kill more children and people than anywhere in the world.
Imagine you are a little boy, a boy no older than six year olds, getting ready to for school. Your blue backpack rests on your shoulders as you approach the red labyrinth, both embracing you while simultaneously encroaching you. Suddenly, a harsh metallic booming sound erupts, and after a mere sliver in time, you lay dead on the floor in a pool of blood. Unfortunately, the course of action just envisioned is not merely hypothetical. Scores of innocent individuals are part of massacres done by the mentally ill with legally bought guns, guns made for war, guns made to maximize death and horror. In terms of reducing violence, the increase in gun regulation is essential in ending the gun violence epidemic
Those who argue for gun control usually state guns are a part of most violent crimes. However, this is not always true. While it is true that limiting gun ownership with laws could prevent individuals from possessing guns, it does not prevent people from illegally having or using guns. Those who carry guns legally are not the problem. According to Mark Gius, the author of “Gun Ownership and the Gun Control Index”, “…only about 25% of total violent crime is committed by a person using a gun, no inferences...
In America guns have been a part of the country since its birth. Throughout history, people of the US have used guns to protect our nation, their families, to hunt for food. The issue of guns and gun control takes on a fraction of problems in the world. Weighing the rights and liberties of individuals against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a risky balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these issues that has both sides firmly stated in their positions.
One who is for gun control would argue that due to the new types of weapons and technology that are being drowned in the twenty first century more laws are needed to better control it. Gun opponents would state that if certain laws that are already on the books are ineffective what effect would new enact law bring. . (Streissugth, Tom). Crime will always be apart of America that is why the individual need to be able self defend themselves. One major group that was against any type of gun control was the National Rifle Association; this group did not any laws that tried to prohibit gun rights to individuals. The NRA was founded in 1871 in New York and later moved to Washington D.C. the group served as an association for instructing and rewarding
...ust be said; when gun control activists say that if there were no guns there would be no gun crime, they are wrong. This is the entire though behind their crusade and is why so many political problems have arose. It would be impossible to accomplish such an act and so they are left with nothing more than a theory. Finally, our United States with their varying governments and constitutions already provide the populace with the mechanism with which to study gun control. This mechanism is the fact that some states chose to restrict and regulate gun sales and possession to a much higher degree than others. The result of the analysis of these two types of state was the states with the strictest gun laws have more murders than the states with the most relaxed laws. These two points come together to illustrate how gun control is, in reality, completely impractical.
Left, right, Liberal, Conservative, Democratic, Republican. There are a lot of synonyms for the sides of our nation divided. Divided on many things: religion, political views, morals, etc.. For a nation that prides ourselves on extraordinary security and unity, it is quite ironic that so many issues can cause such distress and uproar within communities. One such issue is gun control. As a white male in a middle-lower class family that has never owned a gun, I may be somewhat biased. Objectively as I can, I am going to report the facts and more importantly, try to find the core issues at play.
Through out the history of the United States, most, if not all households owned a gun. Used for protection, hunting, hobbies etc. In the second amendment it guaranteed the right to bear arms. The amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. The liberals are trying to amend the constitution in whatever way. Either stop the sales of firearms or restrict the sales so much that minimal amount of people can buy them. Most studies show that controlling firearms have not stop people from committing crimes.
Gun violence in America is a public health crisis, which needs to be recognized and changed by legislatures, and the voting American. As conscious Americans, we need to vote for changes to gun laws that would improve background checks nation-wide, make firearm registration mandatory, restrict the sale of assault weapons and weapon modifications that give the shooter military-grade fire power, and invest in gun-safe technology and safe firearms storage designs. This type of technology will help prevent criminally oriented people from accessing guns, and will help prevent the accidental deaths of many children by guns. This essay will explain the reforms needed to help ensure Americans can still exercise their 2nd amendment right of owning firearms, and preventing the unnecessary deaths of many Americans at the same time.
The debate over gun control in America has constantly brought up over the years due to gunmen killing large amounts of civilizations in shootings. From Columbine to Sandy Hook or the shootings of the two reporters in West Virginia, these public shootings are occurring everywhere. Lawmakers and civilians alike are pushing for increased gun control in hopes of preventing the same tragedies. Anybody that has been affected by the shootings have been pushing Congress and state governments to force new sanctions on government. With the past three years, Congress has shot down all the laws despite the large amounts of public support. Adding more gun control isn’t going to stop the mass shootings from happening.
Gun control is an awfully big issue in the United States today. Many people in America don’t agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns and freedom away from law-abiding citizens. Many citizens have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns aren’t very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection when used correctly. The second amendment states “the right to bear arms”; does this grant everyone the right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for the good guy average Joe to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea, and are taking part in the loss of our freedom that was given to us.
Life in America continues to peak on the account of freedom and advancements. However, there are still some fights for freedom that are in jeopardy. The right to bear arms is a prime example, and the fight to preserve it is threatened daily. Before government took action against the unjust setup of the sexes, women were left in the shadows and rarely received equal opportunities. The fight for equality was long and difficult, but finally their voices were heard.
Listverse,. '10 Arguments For Gun Control - Listverse '. N.p., 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.
Between 1999 and 2013 there were a total of 464,000 gun deaths. Of said deaths, 270,237 of them were suicides, 174,773 homicides, and 9,983 unintentional deaths. The United States, by far, leads the world in deaths via firearms. The connection between how easy it is to gain access to firearms and the number of firearm related deaths is undeniable. Countries such as Japan, Canada, UK, Norway and others are stricter on gun control and it shows in the statistics. For every 100,000 people there 3.54 homicides in the US versus most of the countries listed previously are less than one. In order to prevent mass shootings and violence the United States must put in place laws making it more difficult to obtain firearms.