Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social responsibility of business and corporate governance
Nature and concept of corporate social responsibility
Nature and concept of corporate social responsibility
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Research suggests that corporations of the 21st century can be benefit prodigiously when they are perceived as socially responsible by their stakeholders, however much of that research fails to examine the difference between sectors. Studies about the growth of ethical consumption have primarily focused on commodities such as food products, clothing, or other goods consumers buy on regular basis (Auger et al., 2013). Buying patterns of everyday commodities are subject to increased perception of peer pressure, which can lead to consumers choosing socially responsible products than not. What we hope to discover through hypotheses two is whether CSR differs from luxury purchases and commodities. In prior work attributing to the awareness of …show more content…
A study done by Dolores Gallardo-Vasquez and Isabel Sanchez-Hernandez in 2014 proved this to be true, they hypothesised that there is a positive correlation between corporate social responsibility and success (Gallardo-Vazguez and Sanchez-Hernandez 2014). In the Ratner case, he jokes the company profits falling and within six weeks of his “total crap” speech, his company began to lose sales (Ratner, 2007). Because of his poor corporate social responsibility, it led to the company losing a significant amount of sales. However, in some cases, adequate corporate social responsibility does not always yield more profits. Amy Hillman and Gerald Keim studied how a company’s corporate social responsibility is indirectly correlated to its profits and success (Hillman and Keim, 2001). Therefore, if a company has negative corporate social responsibility, then the company’s sales will remain the same or increase. For example, companies like Apple who utilise inexpensive labour and poor working conditions for their employees still have high profits (Oppenheimer, 2011). Foxconn is the company that manufactures Apple’s products. The organizational culture for Foxconn is ‘‘Profit maximisation is the ultimate corporate principle, under which workers’ dignity and well-being are of no concern’’. Within Foxconn, many people have committed suicide because of their poor working conditions that their workers had to face (Lucas, Kang, and Li, 2012). Regardless of what inhumane events that happen within Foxconn, consumers will still buy Apple
Whilst many firms’ Corporate Responsibility efforts prove to be counterproductive, pitting business against society and pressuring companies to think of generic CSR responses, addressing social issues by creating shared value for both society and the firm can ultimately increase profitability and operational sustainability (Kramer, 2006). In the case of Cameco, the corporation’s 5 pillar strategy demonstrates a strategic ethics policy (Moroz et al, 2015), its focus on creating shared-value enhancing the overall effectiveness of business operations in terms of increased worker productivity through improved working and living environments, and increased revenue due to more efficient operations. As measures of stakeholder power, strategic posture, and economic performance are significantly linked to levels of corporate social disclosure (Roberts, 1992), it is evident that adopting wholesome ethical processes in business practices can aid U92 in the achievement of business
Maignan, I. (2001). "Consumers' perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: a cross-cultural comparison." Journal of Business Ethics 30(1): 57-72.
In most cases, profits and social welfare are at odds. In such a case, business executives being answerable to shareholders are likely to focus on the profit-making aspect of the business rather than going against the interest of their shareholders by promoting social welfare at the expense of profits. In addition, research shows that companies actively involved in Corporate Social Responsibility efforts are more likely to be targeted by activists (Kress, 2011). In fact, it has been established that many companies initiate corporate social welfare projects when they stand to gain from those projects. For example, automakers resulted to creating fuel-efficient vehicles when they became profitable; similarly, energy conservation became an important CSR activity when the cost of energy became very costly. As such, the companies are benefiting their society as they follow their own
Windsor, D. (2001). The future of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9 (3): 225-256.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) invaded the corporate world over the last few decades. This concept has become an essential need for competitive advantage unlike its original role as a nicety. The companies have seen the business benefit of the initiative and stakeholders have appreciated the initiative. This has led to the wide application in the firm’s operational agenda.
In today’s society is it becoming increasingly more difficult for companies to stay competitive in their industry. Even established brands eventually die out due to growing competition from other companies. Corporations are having a difficult time figuring out a strategy that keeps them at the top of their game. Recently, there has been an increased interest in the strategic value of CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility). Corporate advertising is changing dramatically, appealing to consumer’s ethos using the causes that matter most in their lives. It is important for consumers to understand the manipulation that comes along with the CSR strategy. Skepticism about companies’ goals is crucial when making the right consumer decisions. Understanding CSR will help the consumer evaluate the affects of their consumption choices.
The common consensus within the business field is that businesses have a social responsibility to protect and improve the societies they affect. Social responsibility is the belief that businesses and their employees have a duty to act in a manner that benefits their environments and society. The concept of social responsibility stems from ethics, which are simply the moral principles that guide a person’s behavior. However, despite this, it is clear to scholars, researchers, experts, and businessmen alike that sometimes ethics and responsibility are thrown out the window in favor of cutting costs and increasing corporate profits. This tendency for otherwise good businesses to act in badly is known as the Lucifer effect, and is a very real
..., D.J., & Harris, K.E. 2001. Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-72, Cited by Trendafilova, S., Babiak, K. and Heinze, K. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability: Why professional sport is greening the playing field. Sport Management Review.
In recent years, companies are becoming socially responsible and now stakeholders almost expect a company to have CSR policies. Therefore, in twentieth century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) became an important development in public life (Barnett, ND).Corporate social responsibility is defined as “the ways in which an organisation exceeds the minimum obligations to stakeholders specified through regulation and corporate governance” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). Stakeholders can be defined as “those individuals or groups who depend on the organisation to fulfil their own goals and on whom, in turn, the organisation depends” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). There are many purposes for this essay, the first purpose is to descried the key principles of corporate social responsibility and explain their importance for stakeholders. Secondly, is to show how far this company follows those principles in order to be accountable to at least three of its stakeholders. In this essay, three stakeholders, environment, customers and employees will be evaluated respectively and the key principles of the stakeholders will be examined.
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
It seems obvious that large corporations have a tendency to ignore the negative effects of their actions in favor of profit. This example, although sensationalized, still says to me that with power comes responsibility. It affirmed my belief that a corporation’s goal cannot be just to provide profit to shareholders, but there must also be an element of social responsibility.
While the concept of an individual having responsibility is commonly recognized, modern views have lead to the emerging issue of corporate responsibility. Business Directory.com defines corporate social responsibility as, “A company’s sense of responsibility towards the community and environment (both ecological and social) in which it operates. Companies express this citizenship (1) through their waste and pollution reduction processes, (2) by contributing educational and social programs, and (3) by earning adequate returns on the employed resources.” But such a concept has been much disputed since at least the 1970’s.
In the current time of growth and progression, individuals should know that how a business not only flourish but sustain itself. Making profit is one of the main targets of every corporates but it must not be the only one. When an individual builds a company in order to do business, they should be well aware of their contribution towards the society as well as their business and employees in it. It is total strategy of all. We should be able to realize every increment contributes of it. One of the major factors that affect a business is how well it participates in Corporate Social Responsibility. According to (Werther & Chandler, 2006) corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a business practice that involves participating in initiatives that benefits the society. In authenticity, there is a whole lot to argue about it. There are no major guidelines that decides either a business is participating in Corporate Social Responsibility; what might be considered a Business practicing CSR to some, can still not be accepted for it by others. CSR may be restrained a term which his highly flexible. This paper will discuss about Corporate Social Responsibility and its
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...