Group Therapy's Structure And Efficacy?

2279 Words5 Pages

Essential Information: What is Group Therapy’s Structure and Efficacy? Group therapy is used as a common technique to help overcome denial, isolation, and the difficulties of dysfunctional interpersonal relationships. As with all treatment techniques, there is the issue of efficacy. Group therapy can be used in many ways to help people with a variety of concerns. There are advantages and some disadvantages of group therapy. There are different types of group therapy structures. The referral process of group therapy is important because in some cases, a referral is required to join a structured group therapy session. There are different stages in group therapy. The stages provide knowledge of how transition occurs in each of the stages. Depending …show more content…

The goal of group therapy is designed to help the participants to obtain coping skills, discover options, and to reach their goals. Coping skills help the participant deal with problems in a healthy manner, without the need for a structured group therapy session. Options of new productive behaviors are taught by not only the facilitator, but other participants as well. Feedback from both the facilitator and the members help shed light on resolutions the participant may not have thought of previously. Goals provide motivation to the participants to keep moving forward and working on their issues. Group therapy is designed to be objective and …show more content…

In an authoritarian leadership style, the facilitator is viewed as an expert and communication is directed through her/him. There is no direct interaction from member to member. If authoritarian is the leadership style chosen, the facilitator has taken a psychoanalytical approach and uses an educational model. The responsibility for the group’s success is upon the facilitator. In a democratic leadership style, communication from both members and the facilitator are welcomed. Democratic style is used for a humanistic approach and the leader shares the responsibility with the group for its success. Lastly is the style of Laissez-faire. When using the Laissez-faire style, the facilitator acts as a member, not as a leader. Thus, communication is among all members. Usually, facilitators who choose the style of Laissez-faire, is unproductive because of the lack of guidance from the facilitator. If Laissez-faire is the style chosen, commonly the facilitator is found to be uncomfortable in a leadership position or is imitating a Tavistock model in which group members come to terms with authority issues and other childhood issues by fending for themselves (Scheel,

More about Group Therapy's Structure And Efficacy?

Open Document