Group Participation and Interaction Explored in 12 Angry Men

1101 Words3 Pages

Stop for a moment and think how many times have you said “I'll kill you” to a person and actually killed that person? Two times? Three times? We all know that the answer is never unless of course you're actually a killer. This is what might or might not have happened with the boy who was accused of killing his father in the movie 12 Angry Men. Firstly, let's consider on the title of the movie itself which says “12 Angry Men.” Twelve is indicating the number of group members, angry is indicating the state of their temper, and men indicating their gender. So the title of the movie strongly connects to the name of the class “Group Communication Studies” because both involve a group, a goal and communication among the group members in order to achieve a common goal. The 96 minute film is all about a group of jurors sitting in a room on a very hot day to decide the fate of an 18 year old boy. Each judge had to come up with a decision— either the boy is guilty or not guilty of killing his father with a switch blade knife. The entire movie theme revolves around the group and how it completes its task. The group is so much involved in the discussion and there are so many conflicts that the members even forget to introduce themselves, hence the audience has to remember them by numbers of the order of their seating arrangement. This movie is a perfect detailed and visual example of how a group forms and develops over time, and most importantly the personality and approach of Jury number 8 gives an idea about how important it is to participate, speak up, and take a stance even in the early stages of the group formation. Each member's involvement and contribution to the group goal is important as it can reshape and change the dimensions of o... ... middle of paper ... ...irrespective of what majority says. Your participation has the ability to change what others think completely. Due to Jury number 8's participation, the ratio of 1:11 votes(not guilty:guilty) changed to an over all vote of not guilty. Communication doesn't happen non-verbally right at the beginning stages of the group development. If the movie was “11 Angry Men” with Jury number 8 excluded, the other jurors would've done just given vote once, and decided the fate of the boy. Why did the group make its decision not guilty? The answer is plain and simple: “Due to group participation and interaction.” If you were in the place of juror number 8 or any other juror, would you've spoken for the boy or not? Works Cited Engleberg, Isa N. and Dianna R. Wynn. Working in Groups. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2012. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Intolerance And Prejudice In The Play Twelve Angry Men

    1285 Words  | 3 Pages

    Twelve angry men is a play about twelve jurors who have to decide if the defendant is guilty of murdering his father, the play consist of many themes including prejudice, intolerance, justice , and courage. The play begins with a judge explaining to the jurors their job and how in order for the boy to be sent to death the vote must be unanimous. The jurors are then locked into a small room on a hot summer day. At first, it seems as though the verdict is obvious until juror eight decides to vote not guilty. From that moment on, the characters begin to show their true colors. Some of the characters appear to be biased and prejudice while others just want justice and the truth. Twelve Angry Men Despite many of the negative qualities we see

    Read More

  • The Problem of Groupthink in 12 Angry Men

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    The term groupthink in this report is defined as, the social psychological phenomenon that results in groups during pressure situations. This social psychology theory is broken down into eight signs. Illusion of invulnerability, Collective rationalization, Belief in inherent morality, Stereotyped views of out-groups, Direct pressure on dissenters, Self-censorship, Illusion of unanimity, Self-appointed “mindguards”. According to research conducted by Irving Janis, there are three conditions to groupthink. The first, "high group cohesiveness" which is the direction for a group to be in unity while working towards a goal, or to satisfy the emotional needs of its members. Secondly, the structural faults such as insulation of the group, lack of norms and central leadership, in addition social background of group members. The third, situational context includes the circumstances of the groups meeting, social roles and expected behavior. This notion is exemplified during the movie, "12 Angry Men". The purpose of this essay is to examine the movie content to display the groupthink symptoms in place. Groupthink consists of eight major factors that occur during the film's scenes, as the twelve men debate a premeditated murder court case. All of the factors continue to rise as the jury discusses the young man's fate. During the film, a unanimous vote must be reached, despite this one man refuses to vote guilty. In 1957 the Orson Welles directed film opens as the judge explains the case and its severity. Soon after the group forms as the 12 men enter the jury discussion room. During these scene frames, the case evidence is explained. As the men talk they give details of an old man living beneath the boy testified, that he heard a fight, stat...

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men Archetypes

    410 Words  | 1 Pages

    Reginald Rose’s purpose in writing Twelve Angry Men was to shift society’s perception by demonstrating the fractures of the Judicial System and by gathering twelve men from different backgrounds to use their individual knowledge to solve a manslaughter case. Rose plays with archetypes and symbolism throughout the whole play, therefore he uses jurors to represent society during the 1950’s.

    Read More

  • Juror 8 12 Angry Men

    453 Words  | 1 Pages

    “Twelve Angry Men” is a dramatic play written by Reginald Rose. A young Puerto Rican man is put on trial for stabbing his father with a knife, and a stubborn jury is forced to decide his fate. Twelve jurors debate for hours until one by one, each juror is convinced of the defendant’s innocence. Juror eight, the protagonist, tries to prove the boy innocent, while the antagonist, juror three, and the rest of the jury try to change his mind.

    Read More

  • Juror 8 12 Angry Men

    668 Words  | 2 Pages

    The movie, 12 Angry Men, portrays the decision-making process of a case involving twelve men as the jury. Some have clear bias while others have the sincere goal of justice being served. In the beginning, 11 jurors were ready to give a guilty verdict before the details of the case were explored. However, the two men with the most complex relationship are Juror 3 and Juror 8. Juror 3 and Juror 8 are the two characters in 12 Angry Men that drive the plot along, although their persistent conflicting views stemming from differences in backgrounds, behaviors and attitudes cause them to constantly clash.

    Read More

  • Innocent Judged By Ignorants

    1446 Words  | 3 Pages

    "The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy. " Said John Jay, first president of the United States Supreme Court. Society in the last couple of decades has improved when it comes to take decisions that punish criminal acts. There are certain ways to decide whether an individual is guilty or not, these decisions are taken by judges in court but is has not always been that way. Courts all over the world decided that the best way to be impartial when taking a decision was to choose unrelated individuals from any ethnicity or group as a jury. This is better known as Jury of peers. It suggests that individuals chosen from a wide group of social and ethnical roots could take a more ethical and impartial decision about a court case. This jury of peers was later in history proven to be not as accurate since factors like emotions, groupthink and personal interests came into play when taking a decision. Twelve Angry Men, movie from the 1957´s, written by Reginald Rose and Directed by Sidney Lumet explains in depth what jury of peers is all about. It shows that this type of justice is not effective by giving an in depth tour of possible factors and scenarios that surround the twelve angry men jury. An in depth critical examination of the movie will be made to support the abolishment of jury of peers. This kind of justice method is an unexamined tradition. It should be abolished because it is not effective, instead it becomes ineffective since its based in empirical evidence, not real in depth research. It is thought as normal since it has always been used in history but it is not often seen from a critical thinker point of view. To begin, there must be a clear definition of what is expected from a jury w...

    Read More

  • Analytical Essay On 12 Angry Men

    639 Words  | 2 Pages

    The book “12 Angry Men” by Reginald Rose is a book about twelve jurors who are trying to come to a unanimous decision about their case. One man stands alone while the others vote guilty without giving it a second thought. Throughout the book this man, the eighth juror, tries to provide a fair trial to the defendant by reviewing all the evidence. After reassessing all the evidence presented, it becomes clear that most of the men were swayed by each of their own personal experiences and prejudices. Not only was it a factor in their final decisions but it was the most influential variable when the arbitration for the defendant was finally decided.

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    The film "12 Angry Men" exemplifies many theories of social psychology. Using ideology from psychologists, Muzafer Sherriff, Salomon Asch, and others...The film features a group of jurors that pledge guilty and non-guilty on a declared murder. The unraveling of this twelve men arguing demonstrates some of the nature and causes of individual behavior in social situations.

    Read More

  • Groupthink In The Film Groupthink

    407 Words  | 1 Pages

    1. In this film, where 11 out of total 12 jury members voted accused as guilty and eager to leave the room at the earliest. Some of the jury members were so rigid to even re-think over their decision without even realising that this can take up the accused life. In such a situation group members become so confident and failed to think realistically than the phenomenon of ‘GroupThink’ occurs.

    Read More

  • A Summary of 12 Angry Men

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    12 Angry men is about a group of men who are appointed as jury’s. They are put in a room until they could come up with a conclusion, on whether the boy who was convicted of murder is guilty or not.

    Read More

  • Social Worker Intervention Plan

    1785 Words  | 4 Pages

    Toseland, R & Rivas, R 2012, An Introduction to group work practice, 7th edn, Allyn & Bacon, Massachusetts.

    Read More

  • Film Analysis: Movie Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    1497 Words  | 3 Pages

    “12 Angry Men” is a classic example of a movie, whose plot carries various group learning and social psychology theories. Released in 1957, the movie is about a team of 12 jurors who are totally strangers to each other, and are called upon by the judge to reach a consensus on whether to pronounce guilty or not, an 18 year old person accused of murdering his own father. A guilty verdict would lead to a death sentence and hence the onus was on the team of jurors to take a responsible call after examining all the evidences.

    Read More

  • Sociological Processs In The Film Twelve Angry Men

    819 Words  | 2 Pages

    The film “Twelve Angry Men” exhibits many sociological processes. The film features twelve jurors who have to come to a unanimous decision on whether a young boy from the slums is innocent or guilty in the case of murder. At the beginning of the film eleven of the twelve jurors vote guilty. Slowly, through deliberation, reenactment of the case details, and arguments, the twelve jurors vote non-guilty in the case of murder. Upon examination, the film highlights sociological processes in areas of conformity, stereotypes, prejudice, and confirmation bias.

    Read More

  • Reflection On 12 Angry Men

    1301 Words  | 3 Pages

    In class we have watched the movie 12 Angry Men. The movie is about a jury of twelve men deciding whether a boy will go to the death penalty or go out the doors a free man. The case seems clear to many that the boy is guilty of killing his father. Two witnesses testified against the boy, which made eleven of the men convinced that the boy was obviously guilty. When the twelve men headed inside the conference room to discuss the verdict, all of the men except one juror raised their hand for guilty. The one juror wanted to discuss the outcome before he sent a boy to die. The eleven other jurors were extremely upset because they felt as if they were wasting time discussing something that was so obvious.

    Read More

  • Role Of Organizational Behavior In 12 Angry Men

    1535 Words  | 4 Pages

    They must come to a unanimous decision. Jurors discuss their points of view and Juror #8 questions the two witnesses that supposedly heard and seen the young man killing his father. After heated deliberation, the vote was unanimous and the young Latino man was declared not guilty. Organizational Behavior Exhibited in the Movie 12 Angry Men Juror #8 did not subscribe to the idea of groupthink.

    Read More

More about Group Participation and Interaction Explored in 12 Angry Men

Open Document