Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Review of literature on gender stereotypes at work
Review of literature on gender stereotypes at work
Review of literature on gender stereotypes at work
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Review of literature on gender stereotypes at work
Introduction
An important part of our learning and growing experience must stem from our ability to analyze and reflect upon the groups that we have been members in. This reflection can define our understanding of the weaknesses both in ourselves and in the others within our group; and it can help to shape the way that we act in future groups. Adjusting ourselves to compensate for our weaknesses, based upon an honest and thorough examination of our actions within a group setting, is one of most important thing for any person to do. It is only through this evaluation that we can improve ourselves and our interactions with others. This paper will examine a group that was required to make an important decision about adding a new member to the management team, and this group struggled with the decision. I will explain the different ways that conflict emerged between the group members, and why the team members came to disagree so adamantly. I will also attempt to explain some methods that the members of the group, myself included, could have enacted in order to ensure a more positive and friendly meeting. If members of this meeting could have spent more time extolling the virtues of the different candidates, and not debasing the other as a less worthy candidate, I believe that the group members would have had a positive and productive group experience.
Description of the Situation
The group of managers that I will be talking about was called together to perform a series of interviews to fill an empty position within their ranks. The field had been narrowed down by the supervising managers to two remaining candidates. Our meeting started by bringing the two candidates individually before the entire group of managers for a...
... middle of paper ...
...below: a comment on challenges to
group-conflict resolution and reconciliation. Law & Contemporary Problems, 72(2), 51-55. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
Jehn, K. and Mannix, E. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of
intragroup conflict and group performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238-251. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
O'Hara, E. (2009). Group-conflict resolution: Sources of resistance to reconciliation. Law &
Contemporary Problems, 72(2), 1-19. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
Strickland, B. (2001). Conflict resolution. Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology, 2nd ed, 148-149.
Retrieved from Gale Virtual Reference Library.
Wilson, J. (2010). Understanding Your Style In Conflict Situations. PT in Motion, 2(1), 10.
Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
Building effective teams is of increasing importance in modern organisations. According to study, organisational performance and the satisfaction derived by individuals are influenced by the interactions among members of the group. Therefore, teachers try to build a small HRM Module group to make us understand directly how important the group work is; how will the group works and What is the affection about behaviour of individual. This essay will examine that I reflect on how my personal behaviour affected the other members of the group and influenced the group’s overall success or failure. ‘Reflection is an important human activity in which people recapture their experience, think about it and evaluate it. It is this working with experience that is important in learning’ (Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. 1985). And then, approaches to conflict management will be the central academic theme. The experience I will focus on is the process of group decision making.
Pruitt, Dean G, and Sung Hee Kim. Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. 3rd ed. 2004. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2004.
Huan, L. & Yazdanifard, R. (2012). The Differences of Conflict Management Styles and Conflict Resolution in Workplaces. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal. 1(1), 141-155.
Turman, P. (October 13, 2000b). Group Decision Making & Problem Solving: Group Communication [Lecture] Cedar Falls, IA. University of Northern Iowa, Communication Studies Department.
Abigail, R. A., & Cahn, D. D. (2011). Managing conflict through communication. 4th Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Conflict theory describes a social structure prone to constant erosion and change. Here, social change is pervasive through inherent conflicts built into the system itself. Similarly, conflict management approaches view the conflict that arises among member of small groups as inevitable and inherent in the small group itself. Sooner or later, two people will disagree, perhaps to
As the processes and systems used in business have become more complex, teams, not individuals, have become popular in many organizations. Teams are made up of individuals from an organization brought together to solve a problem, improve a process or implement a new process. “A major advantage that a team has over an individual is its diversity of resources and ideas” (Burns, 1995, p. 52). However, this diversity can cause conflict within the team. The success of the team is strongly influenced by the team’s ability to recognize the causes of, manage and resolve conflict.
People work in groups or teams everyday whether in their career, education, political organization, church, or any other social setting. Conflict while working in teams or groups is inevitable. When taking people of different backgrounds, personalities, moral, and ethical beliefs and putting them together in a group, conflict will arise. The key to achieving your team goals is to construct and conquer your goals with keeping the greater good of the team in mind. Conflict as it arises should be combated and abated through swift and thorough resolution techniques. When dealt with properly conflict resolution can give rise to a cohesive and productive team.
Many people enjoy working or participating in a group or team, but when a group of people work together chances are that conflicts will occur. Hazleton describes conflict as the discrepancy between what is the perceived reality and what is seen as ideal (2007). “We enter into conflicts reluctantly, cautiously, angrily, nervously, confidently- and emerge from them battered, exhausted, sad, satisfied, triumphant. And still many of us underestimate or overlook the merits of conflict- the opportunity conflict offers every time it occurs” (Schilling, nd.). Conflict does not have to lead to a hostile environment or to broken relationships. Conflict if resolved effectively can lead to a positive experience for everyone involved. First, there must be an understanding of the reasons why conflicts occur. The conflict must be approached with an open mind. Using specific strategies can lead to a successful resolution for all parties involved. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument states “there are five general approaches to dealing with conflict. The five approaches are avoidance, accommodation, competition, compromise, and collaboration. Conflict resolution is situational and no one approach provides the best or right approach for all circumstances” (Thomas, 2000).
Some of the characteristics seen in collaborative leadership are shared problem-solving and decision making. In order to come to a mutual decision between group members, the...
Individuals have their own personalities that can influence their enthusiasm and productivity within an organization. In addition, individuals also form groups and are part of teams that work together to reach a common goal within organization. According to Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, and Konopaske (2009) dedicated and cohesive teams can have a tremendous impact on organizations effectiveness and the global market. However, all of this happens within the frame-work of office politics and can hinder or enhance the organization’s effectiveness. Therefore, it is important to not only understand individuals, but also groups, teams and office politics within the organization. This will help leaders to plan, organize and motive individuals and groups for the best possible outcome for the organization.
According to McShane and Von Glinow, conflict is “a process in which one party perceives that his or her interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party” (328). The Conflict Process Model begins with the different sources of conflict; these sources lead one or more parties to perceive that a conflict exists. These perceptions interact with emotions and manifest themselves in the behavior towards other parties. The arrows in the figure illustrate the series of conflict episodes that cycle into conflict escalation (McShane and Von Glinow 331-332).
Sreenivas, I. (1997) The positive aspects of conflict. Source: Business Journal Serving San Jose & Silicon Valley, 07/07/97, Vol. 15 Issue 10, p21, 2p, 1bw. Available: www.wls.lib.ny.us/databases/ebsco.com 06/11/99
Working in groups is challenging at times. Other times it is very rewarding. We are so focused on life that we do not take time to reflect on things as much as we should. Being in a Groups class has opened my eyes to a whole new world. I have begun to question, explore, and even understand how things work. I even get how they work sometimes. Not only is there a process involved in making individual decisions, process is involved in group decisions as well. This paper attempts give insight into my reflection of my group decision process.
Due to each member’s confidence within the group to communicate their strengths and weaknesses, our KSAs were efficiently established to ensure tasks were allocated effectively to maximise personal and work outcomes (Stevens and Campion, 1994). Therefore, our approach to the topic was easy, quick and natural as little disagreement occurred. However, this meant that the validity of our assumptions were not questioned and our creativity in terms of audience engagement was stifled (Kirchmeyer and Cohen, 1992). Thus, our group was not exposed to constructive conflict which can be functional and contribute positively to team performance as it reveals important information through different point of views leading to more alternate solutions to problems being reviewed (Amason, 1996). Hence, our overall performance was negatively impacted by our homogeneous group as it resulted in a lack of debate due to little