Study Design
For my research methodology I’m going to focus on the grounded theory research method and build upon the current data that we already have on the topic of nanotechnology and whether or not society will benefit from the advancements in the field of nanotechnology. For my study design I’m going to focus on professionals in the world of science in the field of nanotechnology, and the world of medicine itself as in the end user world, the people that are actually practicing medicine on a daily basis. This will be done through surveys and by doing interviews of the professionals that have direct influence in this field of study. My research question and hypotheses are stated below:
• Will advancements in nanotechnology actually help or hinder mankind?
Hypothesis
H0: Society will not benefit from advancements in nanotechnology.
Ha: Society will benefit from advancements in nanotechnology.
Population and Sample
I will focus on scientific professionals that are in the research and development of nanotechnology and are actually testing and putting the advancements to practice in the lab setting. I will then focus on medical professionals that are actually putting these advancements to work as well. I will not rule out personal opinions in this study so that I can get a clear picture of where someone stands from both viewpoints. I do believe that someone’s cultural background and opinoin will also play a factor in these results, and also that personal opinion can slow the progress or advance the progress as well. I will use at least one hundred of each category so that I can get as much information as possible to come to the best possible result from my research. I will also ensure that those participat...
... middle of paper ...
...m using Grounded Theory as my research method I will be apply an inductive approach to my research methodology. According to (Research Methodology, 2016), Inductive approach starts with the observations and theories are formulated towards the end of the research and as a result of observations (Goddard and Melville, 2001). I won’t be able to come to a conclusion on my hypotheses until I complete my research with the questionnaire and the interviews. From that data I would be able to come to a definitive conclusion and determine that Society would benefit from Nanotechnology research as long as strict guidelines are applied and adhered too by those participating in the Nanotechnology research. According to (Research Methodology, 2016), in inductive approach there is no theory at the beginning point of the research, and theories evolve as a result of the research.
In the article “Pinpointing Cancer Fight,” Liz Szabo states the uses of nanotechnology and how researchers are attempting to use this advancement to fight cancer. She defines that nanotechnology is a type of technology that creates devices on an atomic level; this equipment can allow people such as researchers to use its ability to detect cancerous cells as well as treat them. Szabo remains a neutral tone as she states that while some are against the idea of using nanotechnology since there are many risks, others are optimistic that it may lead to transformational results. She presents a list of some products developed through nanotechnology and explains its usage in addition to mentioning the failure of those nanotech products. Szabo provides
It is clear that nanotechnology has the potential to revolutionize health care and even transport
Nanotechnology is defined as the science of design, synthesis and characterization of matter at the nanoscale, which mesures one billionth of the meter [1,2] On that scale, structures exhibit novel chemical, physical and biological properties and processes, which enables the creation of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), with various characteristics and potential applications. [3] It’s not just that though. Nanotechnology shows the ability to eliminate the gaps among medicine, material engineering and science, computer technology and public policy, creating new clinical and medical approaches to better diagnose, treat and prevent any kind of illness. In fact, it is already moving from simple passive structures
...nessing “the power of nanotechnology” to radically change the way we diagnose, treat, and prevent cancer.” The most likely method implemented will by the use of nanovectors for targeted delivery of anticancer drugs, and then heating nanoparticles that are attached to cancer cells so that the cancer cells explode. (5, 9) There are still many obstacles that must be overcome before this is a reality: from the ethical concern by some that nanobots will take control of the body to the more practical problem that this method of treatment will be very expensive and funding will be an issue. (6) But with millions of people suffering from some form of cancer, scientists are searching for cures and treatments and nanotechnology offers the greatest promise. One day, cancer may be completely curable thanks to nanotechnology which is something everyone would benefit from.
“Some of these inventions consist of Nanotechnology [manipulation of matter measured with an atomic, molecular, and supramolecular scale], sold with the possibility to include medicine and energy production.” He stops in front of an oversized entrance right next to the study just next to the stairs. The man makes sure he has your attention, expressing with an unassuming quality. Knowing what he is about to tell you may darken your opinion of the doctor, nevertheless, he must tell the story.
However, Grounded Theory is identified as ?a qualitative research design in which inquirer generates a general explanation (a theory) of a process, an action, or an interaction shaped by the views of a large number of
The authors adopted the interpretive qualitative methods – ‘entering the research participants’ worlds’ (Charmaz, 2014) (p. 33) to learn about their perspectives. However, the researchers didn’t attempt to critically examine their own role/relationship, thus leaving potential bias and influence unchecked. In the qualitative research method, the researchers’ personal beliefs and values may distort the result (Holloway and Wheeler, 2013), therefore, it is best to clarify this in the report (Lockwood, Munn & Porritt, 2015).
A good formal theory ought to be at least the equivalent ought of a ton of ethnographies and perhaps half a gross of substantive theories (Strauss 1987, p.248). A substantive grounded theory is a tailor-made theory while a formal grounded theory is a ready-made theory (Kearney 1998). Substantive theory may limit its application to other contexts if a constant comparative method of modifying a theory is neglected. Nevertheless, it may have important general implications and relevance to other areas. It is for this imperative that, the emergent substantive grounded theory generated from data, is moved to a formal theory. Formal theory allows more generalization, and transferability of research results, which may be adapted to other different scenarios.
.... Nano; the emerging science of nanotechnology: remaking the world – molecule by molecule. Little, Brown and Company. New York, New York. 1995.
Nanotechnology is defined as “ a technology executed on the scale of less than 100 nanometers, the goal of which is to control individual atoms and molecules, especially to create computer chips and other microscopic devices” (Webster’s Dictionary, 1999). In the early 1970’s an MIT student by the name of K. Eric Drexler came up with the idea of manufacturing things, both biological and non-biological, from the molecular level up. Drexler noticed the amazing talents of natural biology and wondered if humans could mimic biology on a mechanical level,
However, Grounded Theory can be identified as ‘a qualitative research design in which inquirer generates a general explanation (a theory) of a process, an action, or an interaction shaped by the views of a large
1. Chen, Andrew. “The Ethics of Nanotechnology.” online posting. March 2002. Actionbioscience. 10 Feb. 2005. .
Identify some core values of this organization as best as you can. What do they believe in (beyond organizational success or profitability)? How might their revealing these values to customers and employees create opportunities to exceed expectations? How can they translate core values into actions to produce A-plus value, thus strengthening relationships?
Nanotechnology includes nanorobots which are so small that they can be injected into the human bloodstream after which the nanorobots can do investigations or repair at cellular level. Nanorobots could optimize the delivery of pharmaceutical products, these means that medicines which are targeted on a specific type of cells can be delivered to only those cells by the nanorobots. The robots can attach to the cells after which they can inject the drug into the target cells. This could be a great breakthrough for cancer treatments such as chemotherapy because there is a minimal chance of injecting healthy cells with the drug and therefor negative side effects can be avoided.
The procedures that will be the future of modern medicine currently fall into the realms of taboo and fictional. These procedures encompass every aspect of medical science, from exploration of the human body, curing diseases, to improving a person’s quality of life. Many of these procedures are not very well known, while a few have been in the spotlight. These procedures include cloning, nano-robotics, retro-viruses, and genetic manipulation via gene-specific medications. For any serious breakthroughs in modern medical science, we must embrace these new forms of treatment instead of shying away from them. Second, I’ll attempt to explain how these methods and procedures could benefit mankind.